Well-Known Email Prankster Ends Up With Sensitive Document From Jared Kushner's Lawyer
from the sold-out-by-autocomplete? dept
Careless handling of sensitive emails isn't just a problem for Trump's top advisor, Jared Kushner. Having rolled into office on the echoing cries of "Lock her up!" Trump's team nonetheless continued to use private email accounts for official correspondence. Kusher did this twice: using both a Republican National Committee account as well as another personal email address.
It's a security issue as well as a transparency issue. Personal email accounts -- while convenient (and conveniently opaque) -- are little more than attack vectors for cybercriminals and state-sponsored hacking. Making this security problem worse are Trump team legal reps, who can't seem to stop communicating with staffer-spoofing accounts.
A prankster known only by his Twitter handle (SINON_REBORN) has a few admin team trophies on his wall already. The prankster has already duped White House Special Counsel Ty Cobb with an impersonation of White House Media Director Dan Scavino. That followed successful pranking of Breitbart editors and White House Homeland Security Advisor Tom Bossett.
The latest victim is Jared Kushner's lawyer, Abbe Lowell. He's been stung twice, as the Verge's Sarah Jeong reports.
This is the second time that Abbe Lowell, a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, who began representing Kushner in June, has fallen for a prankster who calls himself SINON_REBORN (a reference to the original legend of the Trojan Horse). Two days ago he corresponded with kushner.jared@mail.com, as the fake Jared Kushner asked for legal advice on whether to remove correspondence on his private email account that featured "adult content." Fortunately for Lowell, the conversation didn't go far, ending with, "Don't delete. Don't send to anyone. Let's chat in a bit."
This email exchange likely gave Kushner's lawyer a few mental images he wished he'd never had. A more descriptive recounting of the email exchange at Business Insider shows Abbe Lowell tangling with possibly unfamiliar fetishes.
"I need to see I think all emails between you and WH (just for me and us)," Lowell wrote. "We need to send any officials emails to your WH account. Not stuff like you asked about. None of those are going anywhere."
"But we can bury it?" the prankster responded. "I'm so embarrassed. It's fairly specialist stuff, half naked women on a trampoline, standing on legoscenes, the tag for the movie was #standingOnTheLittlePeople :("
That Lowell believed this was from his client raises questions about the frequency of emojis in Kushner's communications. But this exchange wasn't the end of it. The next email the prankster received from Kushner's lawyer was unsolicited, but it contained a sensitive document.
We don't know exactly what happened, but the most likely scenario is that Lowell's mail client autocompleted to the fake Kushner email address, landing a sensitive letter right in the prankster's inbox. SINON_REBORN then reposted the letter on Twitter.
The document is a committee-eyes-only letter from the Senate Intelligence Committee, ordering him to preserve emails from his personal account possibly related to the ongoing Russian election interference investigation. Presumably these emails wouldn't include half-naked trampoline Lego porn, but Lowell's response to take the discussion offline suggests there are still several ongoing discussions the Intelligence Committee won't be able to access.
Is this administration's operational security worse than the last one's? There's not enough data available to tell. But SINON-REBORN's pranks were already well-known before this latest administration gaffe, suggesting a lack of detail orientation by admin members and their legal representation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: abbe lowell, email, jared kushner, prank
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hmmm.
But it looks like the lawyer is doing what he should be doing: preserving emails by forwarding official ones to the White House. Since he doesn't seem to think he's being pranked (and therefore trying to look good to the public), it's good that he didn't respond with, "Delete all of it!"
But partisans will not give anyone on the other side even a tiny benefit of a doubt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hmmm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Remedial email security classes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remedial email security classes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hmmm.
...I'm not going to give somebody a cookie just because he didn't commit a felony, John.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remedial email security classes
Remedial email security classes for everyone in government! Learn how not to be duped.
I've heard that security consultants from Sinon-Tek give some pretty pretty thorough lectures, with tons of in-depth coverage of electronic communication best practices.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Only Half-naked porn?
Seems we need to introduce the white house to Fully Clothed Porn starring Donald Trump!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fool me once
fool me... You can't get fooled again!
take it from gw
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Only Half-naked porn?
Your surprise indicates a serious lack of exposure to porn. To cure this condition, you should spend at least 30 minutes a day on PornHub.
Just be careful of accidental tweeting.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remedial email security classes
Now, granted: I'm very, very good at it because I've had multiple decades of practice and I invest considerable time in studying my targets before I try anything. So not everyone out there could do this.
But there are multiple governments out there that eat this for breakfast, which is why what Kushner has done three times (not twice: another story broke last night) is incredibly reckless and dangerous. Keep in mind: this is the one WE KNOW ABOUT. Surely it's not the only one. Surely intelligence agencies exploited this a long time ago. Surely some of them took advantage of the situation to plant malware or otherwise ensure long-term access to his email.
As I commented in a related thread here yesterday, there is no way that anybody who's a top ten target (or even top hundred, for that matter) should be doing this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Funny...but
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Only Half-naked porn?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Funny...but
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Funny...but
When did he solicit privileged information?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Hmmm.
Proving my statement: But partisans will not give anyone on the other side even a tiny benefit of a doubt.
Good job!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm.
That has nothing to do with partisanship or giving someone the benefit of the doubt. Someone not screwing up and/or breaking the law is not worth note or praise, unless you're setting the bar really low.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Hmmm.
Unlike the US (and probably other) militaries?
Good Conduct Medal:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Funny...but
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm.
He's a high paid lawyer that gives good legal advice. Kind of what you expect from your lawyer, good advice. If I need advice about private e-mail accounts used for sensitive government business I know I can go to him. Now, how does that make any of this better and/or worse?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Remedial email security classes
Can I please get a link to the third one? I'm Googling it, but I can't find it (presumably because it's being buried under all of the other Kushner e-mail stuff).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Remedial email security classes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm.
Not really; that sounds like it sets the bar higher than just "don't commit any felonies." I'm not military so I don't know what constitutes a disciplinary infraction or requires non-judicial punishment, but those standards sure sound like they're south of committing a felony.
[ link to this | view in thread ]