This Week In Techdirt History: October 1st - 7th
from the stuff-that-happened dept
Five Years Ago
This week in 2012, as copyright trolls continued their war on open wi-fi, rightsholders in the EU sought new storage media levies for the cloud and US ISPs were gearing up to enact their "six strikes" plan, we were trying to kill the myth that the constitution guarantees copyright. Some people at least seemed to get it, with a high-profile EU Parliament Committee proposing the ability to create non-copyrighted content, a DOJ lawyer exploring the fact that copyright needs to change in the internet age, and Psy mega-amplifying his Gangnam Style fame by allowing anyone to use the song and video for anything.
Ten Years Ago
This week in 2007, it was expected and then confirmed that the RIAA would win its lawsuit against Jammie Thomas — even as we speculated that investors would soon force the RIAA to abandon its aggressive lawsuit strategy. In that trial, a Sony-BMG exec made some pretty absurd statements, around the same time that Viacom's CEO gave a speech demonstrating that the company is wrong about almost everything related to the internet and modern media, and the president of the ESA was calling for lots more DRM. But at least one group of creators was experimenting: Radiohead announced the pay-what-you-want plans for their album In Rainbows.
Fifteen Years Ago
Even back in 2001 this week, Hollywood already had its hooks in the government (and was working hard on getting them into colleges too). The music industry was heavily on the offensive and sending misguided musicians to complain to the government about downloading. As Napster creator Shawn Fanning was giving interviews about the service's demise (and even selling life story rights to MTV), the next generation of file sharing tools was starting to wonder if the "Betamax doctrine" would ever prove effective as a defense. Meanwhile, Congress was still considering an onerous and extreme DRM bill (which as we'll see in a few weeks was eventually killed, surprisingly, by.... Senator Patrick Leahy, who is more recently known for introducing a terrible copyright bill).
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Twenty years ago
After last week, smoothly heating it up… It was twenty years ago, today…
Up-To-Date September 28 - October 4, 1997
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Twenty years ago
Gordon Moore tells us Moore's Law runs out of steam in 2017.
...So 2017's almost over, what have we got?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
more cores, memory and storage capacities to maintain progress.
Todays PCs and devices will be good enough for awhile. so watch
for prices to start dropping instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moore's law
Now we also have the internet of insecure THINGS! lol
Seriously, we need to turn to the fundamentals of computing: How do you secure a computation when the hardware and software is unreliable? What does security mean in the face of the total inability to keep secrets, where anyone can trivially copy anything?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Moore's law
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3227044/internet-of-things/why-chipmakers-are-taking-iot-s ecurity-into-their-own-hands.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Clock speeds have stopped rising ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The number of transistors on a chip are directly affected by
scaling and that scaling is the main factor in clock speeds.
Shrinking of features is slowing their advances and clock
speed advances are inevitably slowing in lock-step.
Thus, clock speeds can't be separated from Moore's Law and
have been following it all along from the '60s.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Twenty years ago
Synchronized chickens.
Multiple cores and multi-threaded software are now the norm. We've gotten really good at making those chickens work together.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OFF TOPIC IMPORTANT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]