Snopes Debunks Fake YouTube Video; Video's Creator Responds With A Bogus DMCA Notice

from the pressing-the-shut-up-button dept

Wed, Dec 6th 2017 1:40pm — Tim Cushing

Nothing But the Truth Films (NBT) has a credibility problem. Oh, the irony, I would normally say, except for the fact NBT deals mostly with this sort of "truth."

We present the black and white facts about the geopolitical climate which include Islam, Illuminati, Freemasonry, Cults and more. See how your freedoms are slowly eroding and spread the message with the help of our channel.

So… that's the kind of "truth" we're dealing with, often pronounced "conspiracy theory." J.K. Sheindlin is the person behind NBT Films and the author of a book that has supposedly blown minds of Islam adherents everywhere, resulting in them renouncing their faith on camera.

One popular video on NBT's YouTube channel shows a supposed Islamic man angrily and bitterly decrying the religion after having his eyes opened by Sheindlin's book. But the video isn't what it seems: it's actually footage taken from somewhere else, dealing with an entirely different issue, but with NBT's fabricated subtitles giving the impression Sheindlin's book has unconverted another follower of Islam.

It made the internet rounds enough that Snopes picked it up and debunked it.

While the video purports to tell the “black and white facts” about someone renouncing his faith because of Sheindlin’s book, the clip in reality does not capture an Arab’s reaction to a controversial book, nor does it capture that person renouncing his faith on live television. Sheindlin added fabricated captions to the video (while pledging to tell “nothing but the truth”) in order to generate buzz for his book The People vs Muhammad.

This footage is dated 2 July 2013, when Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi rejected the military’s ultimatum to leave office. Opposition activist Ihab al-Khouli, the “Arab guy” in the video displayed above, was reacting to Morsi’s speech…

Having been caught out, Sheindlin did what any self-respecting ~~truth-seeker~~ huckster would do: he decided to get Google involved. The invaluable Dean Sterling first spotted the bogus DMCA notice:

Last month, the conspiracy channel filed a DMCA copyright complaint requesting that Google delist Evon’s article from its search results. That’s according to the Lumen Database, which archives online takedown requests.

And here's what the bogus takedown notice says:

The copyrighted work is a video that our company produced, and has been embedded on the following website without our permission. You can see the video embedded on the page, under the section ‘Origin’. We did not give any authorisation for the website ‘Snopes’ to use our video for their news. Therefore, the company Snopes has infringed our copyright.

First off, no one needs permission to embed a YouTube video. If someone wants to prevent others from embedding their videos, they can always turn that option off. Second, Sheindlin's complaint about someone else using "his" video is especially rich considering he's using footage created by someone else without acknowledgment and, on top of that, adding his own subtitles to misconstrue the content of the footage he "borrowed."

It appears Sheindlin is now warning people about his bogus subtitle work (he has more videos purporting to be people denouncing their Islamic faith after reading his book). This annotation has been added to the beginning of the bogus faith rejection video.

If you can't see it, the text box says: "SUBTITLES CHANGED FOR PROMOTIONAL PURPOSES."

At long last, Nothing But the Truth Films finally engages in a close approximation of honesty. Refreshing. And once again, someone looks at a tool created to stop copyright infringement and sees a way to silence a critic.

Finally, for comparison purposes, here's the legitimate, unaltered video with the correct translation:

And here's NBT's "promotional" garbage bullshit version:

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, debunks, dmca, free speech, takedowns
Companies: nothing but truth films, snopes

41 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2017 @ 1:49pm

hardly nothing new...
when the truth does not work...
lie, lie, lie!

A very effective strategy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Stephen T. Stone (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 10:17pm
  
  Re: hardly nothing new...
  Worked for Donald Trump.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PaulT (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 12:57am
    
    Re: Re: hardly nothing new...
    This is actually the same tactic as the one that Trump was fooled by with the Britain First videos he retweeted. Take a video showing something involving "Muslims" (though at least one of the videos didn't have anything to do with them), put up some misleading claiming they show something they don't and watch the retweets roll in.
    
    At least these ones only result in some idiotic DMCA notices rather than the moron in chief ranting about the state of Islam in the UK and attacking the British prime minister (though none of the videos showed footage from the UK).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Machin Shin, 6 Dec 2017 @ 2:00pm

As angry and animated as that guy was I am betting they really don't want him to find out about their new "subtitles".

I am betting he would have a fair bit to say about it, probably using words you wouldn't spell out in the subtitles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2017 @ 2:14pm

Because we need another infowars clone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Roger Strong (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 2:43pm
  
  Re:
  If some pig-ignorant inbred conspiritard spends his time listening to Alex Jones and posting birther and islamophobic wingnuttery, then at least it keeps him off the streets. It's not like he'll be elected President or appointed National Security Advisor.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - orbitalinsertion (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 3:31pm
    
    Re: Re:
    Ah ha. Ah hahahahaha.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PaulT (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 1:00am
    
    Re: Re:
    Even if he did, it's not like he'll continue to believe the likes of Infowars over his own advisors and let them drive policy and strategy.
    
    Oh... :(
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Baron von Robber, 7 Dec 2017 @ 9:06am
    
    Re: Re:
    Trump Tiki Torches & Alex Jones Desiccated Chicken Bone Broth!! Only $210.99!!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
JoeCool (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 2:30pm

Like I always say
If someone/some company puts words like "honest" or "true" in their ads or ESPECIALLY their name, odds are VERY great that it's a bald-faced lie, and the person/company is the exact opposite of what the word/phrase claims.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Stephen T. Stone (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 10:18pm
  
  Re: Like I always say
  If someone tells you they are honest, they are a liar. An honest person would never need to tell you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JoeCool (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 7:41am
    
    Re: Re: Like I always say
    Pretty much. It comes down to "actions speak louder than words." If they are concentrating on using words, it's often because the actions are lacking or contrary.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Snape (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 5:51am
  
  Re: Like I always say
  There goes my plans for "Honest John's Used Car Sales"!!!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JoeCool (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 7:42am
    
    Re: Re: Like I always say
    :)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFlCD5CYAcU
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2017 @ 9:36am
  
  Re: Like I always say
  It's the same principle with country names that include words like "Democratic" and "People's".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PaulT (profile), 8 Dec 2017 @ 1:40am
    
    Re: Re: Like I always say
    Organisations with "family" and similar are also often somewhat suspect.
    
    Basic rule of thumb - the more someone boasts about how righteous they are, the more likely they are be be scum. Genuinely honest and upright thinking individuals never feel the need to boast about how great they are, it's the ones who are lying to you who do that.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Thad, 8 Dec 2017 @ 2:06pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Like I always say
      And if somebody spends all their time talking about how smart they are, well, that's not a thing that smart people do.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2017 @ 3:25pm

Does this mean TD will be receiving a DMCA on this article soon? You know, for the "truth".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Mr Big Content, 6 Dec 2017 @ 3:28pm

So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
You know Liberals are getting really DESPERATE to ram there so-called "reality" down everybodys throats!

Why is HIllary Clinton getting off scot-free?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- orbitalinsertion (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 3:34pm
  
  Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
  And i was waiting for this also.
  
  But Hillary, she has special agents from the other side of the flat earth that even flat earthers won't tell you about. With mind-control rays and what.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2017 @ 3:49pm
    
    Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
    There is no other side to the flat Earth, don't be silly.
    
    Hillary's agents with mind-control rays are from within the hollow Earth. Get it straight.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2017 @ 4:10pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
      No no no. They are from Earth II that is aways behind the sun.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Jordan Chandler, 6 Dec 2017 @ 4:12pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
        Even though the orbit of the earth is an ellipse and not a circle? ;)
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        JoeCool (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 5:08pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
        It doesn't differ from a circle enough that the other Earth would be visible behind the bulk of the Sun.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - orbitalinsertion (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 7:07pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
      Is that the hollow Earth that's shrinking? I can't keep them all sorted.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Matthew Cline (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 4:36pm
  
  Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
  The reason why Techdirt reported this is because of the abuse of a DMCA notice in an attempt to stifle criticism. If you're aware of a liberal using the DMCA to try to stifle the speech of conservatives, submit it here as a story.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Thad, 6 Dec 2017 @ 4:54pm
    
    Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
    I'm pretty sure he's joking, but it's hard to tell.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - orbitalinsertion (profile), 6 Dec 2017 @ 7:11pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
      It probably happens incidentally, but not so much purpose-driven on a political axis. But it only takes one "liberal" to do it to a "conservative" so those interested in "justifications" can retrofit it to justify history.
      
      The really fun thing his is identifying the lying loon with other conservatives. Good job on that.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2017 @ 2:22am
  
  Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
  I must say that your typing skills are quite remarkable. How DO you manage that while your tongue is firmly lodged in Donald Trump's shit-encrusted asshole?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PaulT (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 2:38am
    
    Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
    My Poe radar is going off with that one, and I'm pretty sure he's a regular satirist
    
    If not, it's very impressive how he whines about political correctness while using the politically correct term for "lies".
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Wendy Cockcroft, 7 Dec 2017 @ 6:02am
      
      Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
      Mr. Big Content is a satirist. He pops up from time to time and I usually find his posts amusing. I wonder if he works for The Onion, The Daily Currant, or anything like that? His posts are in the same vein.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - PaulT (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 6:38am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
        I think the worst creative job right now has to be a writer for The Onion. There's nothing they can write that doesn't bear a strong relationship to actual news, and some of their sillier past stories seem to have parallels to the actions of current politicians.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Wendy Cockcroft, 8 Dec 2017 @ 2:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
        Indeed. A recent post on surveillance was right there in Uncanny Valley.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Baron von Robber, 7 Dec 2017 @ 9:08am
  
  Re: So Alternative Facts Are Not Policitally Correct Now?
  Poe's Law points: 10 of 10!!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2017 @ 7:52pm

I'm more surprised that out_of_the_blue hasn't yet appeared to bitch about how this sort of copyright enforcement should be allowed, because fuck Masnick...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
enterso, 7 Dec 2017 @ 1:50am

Hahaha : D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2017 @ 3:46am

Where's Judge Judith Sheindlin in all this?
I'd love to see her tear strips off this dude.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Dec 2017 @ 3:47am

Nothin' bout the truth?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BentFranklin (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 6:45am

"Last month, the conspiracy channel filed a DMCA copyright complaint requesting that Google delist Evon’s article from its search results."

What is Evon? It's not mentioned elsewhere in the article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Snape (profile), 9 Dec 2017 @ 4:39pm
  
  Re:
  Dan Evon is the writer of the Snopes article.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monday (profile), 7 Dec 2017 @ 12:32pm

I need some help...
... because I don't see the book promo viddy as parody, or a fourth or fifth estate. So, isn't any of the material included at the end of the 'book promo' infringing on copyrights of at least eight different films, or television productions. Because I have watched the material at the end when it was news reporting, or movies.

So, I guess I'm asking, "*Can this hate be DMCA'd itself?

And don't say it's protected speech. Hate propaganda is not a safe haven to promote racism, or religious intolerance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]