This Week In Techdirt History: December 17th - 23rd
from the advent-calendar dept
Five Years Ago
This week in 2012, the MPAA was claiming that millions of DMCA takedowns are proof that Google needs to magically stop piracy, while the RIAA was trying to rewrite the history of copyright, and the BPI was threatening to personally sue the leaders of the UK pirate party. But the intellectual property diplomats at the US State Department were moaning about how they can't export strict copyright laws as easily as they'd like to, since for every country like the UK (where London police were setting up a special force of copyright cops), there was one like Australia (which was refusing to play Hollywood's game). Then, of course, at the end of that same week, the administration's shortlist for new ambassador appointments included a bunch of big Hollywood donors.
Ten Years Ago
This week in 2007, it was sports organizations taking the lead in the copyright fight, realizing they could (ab)use it to try to stifle press coverage, and clamp down on those dastardly live-bloggers. The IFPI went after Alibaba for linking to downloadable music, while the Korean government was paying out $170 million to publishers to mollify them after copyright extensions hurt their businesses. Amidst all this, we were pointing out that "balance" in copyright is a myth and a red herring, and it's time to get off of our unhealthy addiction to intellectual property.
Fifteen Years Ago
Not much different this week in 2002, with the RIAA amping up its extremely dubious claims with extremely dubious math and Hollywood fighting to ban DVD-copying software — while more and more people began to realize that copyright was enabling widespread censorship (not to mention undermining cybersecurity). But, there was a noteworthy light in the darkness! It was this week, about a year after the initial announcement, that Creative Commons was officially launched and began its ongoing project to change the way we think about copyright, content and sharing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
How mightily convenient of you to close for a holiday that most of you don't even celebrate without first writing even ONE paragraph about Eric Shmidt's highly SUSPICIOUS and SUDDEN resignation.... gee whiz.... "what a surprise".....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What do you want them to say right now that cannot be said in a few days? Have some patience, damn.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Par for the course around here. If it has to do with something insidious at Google, they're gonna do one thing or another to Spackle it over, and/or minimize the nature of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: If it has to do with something insidious at Google, they're gonna do one thing or another to Spackle it over ...
Liberal media, or conservative memory?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I can't wait for you to cite the proof that whatever post Techdirt writes on the matter was crafted over the Christmas holiday with the aid of a cadre of lawyers.
No, really, I can't wait. Cite your proof or GTFO.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Par for the course around here. If it has to do with something insidious at Google, they're gonna do one thing or another to Spackle it over, and/or minimize the nature of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: If it has to do with something insidious at Google, they're gonna do one thing or another to Spackle it over ...
GOOGLE HAS BEEN A BAD DOG.
Google has been a bad dog... however you must consider they are dealing with this and that and the other and when you look at it from that retarded vector, they are not really "that" bad of a dog, now are they? In fact, they are merely victim of circumstances....
"Presto" "Unbiased" "reporting" "from" """TechDirt"""
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Get over yourself. You're bitching on a website you yourself admit is insignificant. If that was the case you wouldn't be here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
If you want to celebrate the downfall of Google because one man was a pervert, good for you, lots of websites talk about it. This country is run by a self-declared womanizer. You see him sharing a cell with Bubba any time soon?
[ link to this | view in thread ]