Vice Media Goes After Vice Industry Token, A Porn Crypto-Currency Company, For Trademark
from the pron-coin dept
The last time we checked in with Vice Media it was firing off a cease and desist letter to a tiny little punk band called ViceVersa, demanding that it change its name because Vice Media has a trademark for the word "vice" for several markets. In case you thought that occurrence was a one-off for Vice Media, or the result of an overzealous new hire to the company's legal team, Vice Media is again trademark bullying another comany, Vice Industry Token. VIT is apparently a pornography cryptocurrency company, which is a three-word combination that I bet god herself could never have imagined being uttered. The claim in the C&D notice that VIT got is, of course, that Vice Media has a "vice" trademark and that this use infringes upon it.
Vice Media sent a cease-and-desist letter to the digital upstart in November, alleging its "Vice Industry Token" trademark infringes on its rights to "Vice," according to a complaint filed Friday in California federal court.
As noted, VIT is going to court to declare its use of the word "vice" non-infringing. The complaint as filed does not offer up the reasoning VIT has for its use to not be infringing, but it's fairly easy to guess. Vice Media is a major media company playing in a variety of markets, from magazines to music and journalism. It is not, however, the following:
VIT offers its proprietary cryptocurrency and also operates an adult entertainment platform, which, according to the complaint, are together designed to "change the nature and monetization of pornography."
There is simply nothing between the two entities that represents a competitive situation. Given that, I have to expect that the court will side with VIT, which was quite smart in seeking this declaratory judgement. What that will not answer, though, is why Vice Media ever thought any of this was necessary to begin with.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cryptocurrency, porn, trademark
Companies: vice, vice industry token, vice media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Easy. Their lawyers were bored.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: VIT is apparently a pornography cryptocurrency company
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ViseGrip (tm) should sue everyone else involved
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just once...
"No. Sue us. More judges could use a good laugh."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Get a grip
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pass the smelling salts!
Please pass me my smelling salts! Does someone mean to say that "vice" is more descriptive or generic than fanciful or arbitrary when used as a skin-trade mark?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
/s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wait a second..
They are awesome and powerful.
I can see how Apple Computer feels they have strong claim on the word 'Apple' as applied to computer-related items, even though it's a common word and Apple Music was well known before they started. The word 'Apple' has nothing to do with computers.
But when you name your company 'Vice' and you are engaged in vice... that's pretty much like naming your restaurant 'Diner' and expecting to have a valid trademark claim.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
On the other hand...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But what if Vice Media maybe could have thought in the future about going into that market? You know, like maybe the Dr. Seuss estate might have done a Seuss/Star Trek mashup maybe someday maybe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: On the other hand...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Eyes, eyes, Bay B.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
reporting is hard
[ link to this | view in thread ]
" The Vice Media Token is built using Smart Media Token protocols being developed by Vice and its partners. What Vice is building is unique and creates a simple engagement-oriented protocol used to facilitate the creation and exchange of tokens between participants in media consumption. Paid blogging ..."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Maybe the AI for spambots is evolving. Or average_joe was never a lawyer and was an AI all along!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
If you want an elaboration: At least in the US, it is easiest to get trademark protection for something that is not a real word; this is called a "fanciful" mark. The next easiest is a word that has nothing to do with the product or service; this is called an "arbitrary" mark. If the word is "descriptive" of the product or service, it is quite hard to get trademark protection. If the word is a "generic" term for the product or service, you cannot get trademark protection for it.
Because "vice" is generally taken to be a descriptive term for pornography (among other products and services), Vice Media should get ready for some serious sanctions from the court on the grounds of filing frivolous claims.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]