Apple's Internal Memo Warning Employees Not To Leak To The Press Leaks To The Press
from the of-course-it-did dept
Whatever the actual numbers, it seems like some hefty percentage of technology news revolves around leaks of one kind or another. Whether it concerns government, corporate, or legal proceedings information leaking to the public, it happens enough that at this point the operating posture of any organization should probably be to expect leaks, rather than flailing at modernity and trying to stop them. Hell, if the White House can't keep what seems like literally anything under wraps, what hope does the average business have?
Apple, of course, is not an average company. And, yet, when the company put out an internal memo warning its employees not to do the leaking, that memo almost immediately leaked to the press.
On Friday, Bloomberg News published what it described as an "internal blog" post in full. The memo warned that Apple "employees, contractors, or suppliers—do get caught, and they’re getting caught faster than ever."
The post also reportedly noted that, "in some cases," leakers "face jail time and massive fines for network intrusion and theft of trade secrets both classified as federal crimes," adding that, in 2017, "Apple caught 29 leakers, and of those, 12 were arrested."
Memos like this set off a delightfully oppressive mood within the organizations that send them. Part of the reason for that is that the practice of leaking is so widespread so as to make the selective persecution of any leaker seem callous and unfair. Add to that the simple fact that well-timed strategic leaks are practically marketing SOP in many larger organizations and this seems doubly so. And, finally, I cannot be the only one struck by how low Apple's catch-rate feels within the memo itself. 29 leakers caught in a year? That has to be some unimpressive fraction of the actual leakers that exist.
Anyone who might want to argue the points above needs to make that argument in the context of a reality in which this scare-memo itself leaked to the press. That this occurred only buttresses the argument that battling all leaks all the time is a losing battle. And if that's the case, then the selective enforcement of anti-leaking policies will only come off as both confusing and capricious.
Not to mention a giant waste of time and money, compared with incentivizing employees to leak only when its beneficial to the company.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, leaks, press
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Context required
I agree with the author that 29 seems like a very low count of prospective-leakers in a company the size and type of Apple.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Leaking....like piracy...
Leaks, especially harmful ones, are also symptoms...I'd like to see someone analyze apple leaks and determine what's gone south with the culture there!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gay
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All employee has to do is get in, get on the freeway and FLOOR IT. At 171 miles an hour top speed, CHP vehicles would not able to catch them.
Ford electronically limts their Police Interceptor to 140 miles an hour. Crown Vic, Taurus, and Explorer police interceptor vehicles could be outrun. There is no car, right now, in the California Highway Patrol (CHP) fleet fast enough to catch a high end Camaro with the 6.2 engine.
So any Apple employee that can afford should get themsleves one of these, so that if police to try arrest you for leaks, you will have car that outrun every police vehicle on the road in California.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This so they cannot anything else that you might not know about, to "muscle" you into a plea deal.
If KillDisk is regualarly used, anything else you don't know about they can use against you cannot be recovered.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's not a memo, that's a threat letter.
"We will knowingly abuse the CFAA and fuck you harder than Aaron Swartz's corpse if you leak anything to the press."
Whatever. Just one more reason to not support Apple or use any of their products and services. As if we needed any more.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
same old story
Apple does and can take action, as any company can, about the divulgence about sensitive information.
I get that certain leaks are purposeful. And the thing is this leaked memo might have been a test to find out who is leaking information. So while this story looks stupid on the face of it, it probably identified a leaker they have been tracking for some time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spnH5ynCJvo
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: same old story
If I was a very large and cash-rich tech company who really wanted to go after leakers, I would use a portion of that money to personalize every single company-wide communication I send out to catch people like this. While there are too many variables to do it for an individual, you absolutely can do it by department.
Specific phrasing changes, paragraph changes, hidden characters, unique pixels, unique font substitution, font colour/text size changes, unique character or paragraph spacing, etc. Stuff that gives away the leaker.
Many reputable news orgs know this can happen and will change the text to protect their source. But I can see a ton of tech blogs just copy and paste exactly in a rush to print, screwing over their source.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
just use 0-width characters like in my comment here to hide text
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Remember the big Apple commercial?
"Hello, new employees, and welcome to Apple's orientation. Please be aware that we averaged an arrest rate of one employee per month last year, and that was just among the leakers we caught. So be aware that we are watching you, and breaking our rules will have severe consequences."
The first Rule of Apple Club is that you don't talk about Apple Club.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That's not a memo, that's a threat letter.
If they put a GPS ankle bracelet on you, you just use a jammer that jams wireless internet so that its link to the monitoring center. This is so they cannot detect it when cut the bracelet off, and then put it in your microwave oven to destroy it. A few seconds in the microwave will destroy the circuitry in the device. They will have no clue that you put it in the microwave and destroyed it. They will just lose all contact with the device
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The turbo charged engine on it has enough horsepower to allow to fly at 30,000 feet, provided you have an oxygen supply, and if you have the enlarged fuel tanks, you can go about 1,500 miles.
That 1,500 mile on high performance version of that aircraft would be more than enough to able to get into Mexico, and beyond the reach of the Feds. It is only about 500 miles straight line distance from the San Jose area to the Mexican border. Even the Candian border could be reached without having to refuel.
There is no helicopter made that can climb to 30,000 feet or be able to follow an aircraft all the way to the Mexican or Canadian border
[ link to this | view in thread ]