ESPN Has Finally Realized This Whole Streaming Thing Has Legs
from the go-figure dept
ESPN has personified the cable and broadcast industry's tone deafness to cord cutting and TV market evolution. Executives not only spent years downplaying the trend as something only poor people do, it sued companies that attempted to offer consumers greater flexibility in how video content was consumed. ESPN execs clearly believed cord cutting was little more than a fad that would simply stop once Millennials started procreating, and ignored surveys showing how 56% of consumers would ditch ESPN in a heartbeat if it meant saving the $8 per month subscribers pay for the channel.
As the data began to indicate the cord cutting trend was very real, ESPN's first impulse was often to try and shoot the messenger. Meanwhile, execs doubled down on bloated sports licensing deals and SportsCenter set redesigns, pretty clearly unaware that the entire TV landscape was shifting beneath their feet.
By the time ESPN had lost 10 million viewers in just a few years, the company was busy pretending they saw cord cutting coming all the while. ESPN subsequently decided the only solution was to fire hundreds of longstanding sports journalists and support personnel, but not the executives like John Skipper (since resigned for other reasons) whose myopia made ESPN's problems that much worse.
Ultimately, ESPN and Disney figured out that streaming was the future. In response, it launched a new direct-to consumer app dubbed ESPN+ that sort of gave users what they wanted, but not really. The $5 per month service basically took much of the fare available on ESPN's lesser-watched channels and offered it over the internet. But there were caveats; such as the service didn't really offer users what they really wanted (just a streaming version of ESPN's core channel) unless you subscribe to traditional cable, part of the "TV Everywhere" mindset cable execs can't seem to move past.
Even then, the service still managed to gobble up more than a million subscribers in just over five months, a fact ESPN was quick to highlight in a press statement about the milestone:
"Reaching one million paid subscribers is an important milestone for any video subscription service, but reaching this benchmark in such a short amount of time is an incredible testament to the teams from DTCI and ESPN who have worked tirelessly to bring this product to market and continually improve it since our April launch,” said Kevin Mayer, chairman, Direct-to-Consumer and International, The Walt Disney Company. “We’re thrilled so many sports fans have quickly come to love the service. The future is bright and we believe growth will continue as we add features, distribution partners and more exclusive content in the coming months."
While better late than never, you have to think ESPN would have far more than a million subscribers by now if execs had actually paid attention to the market they inhabit. And while ESPN+ is making progress, ESPN still finds itself between a rock and a hard place in terms of providing users what they actually want (again, just a streaming version of ESPN). In short, if ESPN offers a standalone version of ESPN, it only encourages customers to cut the cord and move to less expensive (and less profitable) alternatives. If ESPN doesn't give customers what they want, they'll cut the cord out of frustration.
That said, you'd rather be out ahead of a major paradigm shift than trailing behind, a lesson ESPN execs seem to be slowly but steadily learning.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cord cutting, internet, sports, streaming
Companies: espn
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
You can put an ugly painting in a new shiny frame and it's still an UGLY Painting!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They will finally launch…The Ocho.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Consumer demand??
Part of this problem is that All the movies are OWNED from the past..Few and FEWER are going to the public domain..
But even at that, a few channels have been created FOR/FROM those old movies/serials/...Supposedly they dont need to pay any royalties.. If that were so, do you think there would be MORE channels showing them LATE NIGHT??
Lets ask something interesting, with 1 understanding. How many fires have there been that destroyed repositories of films??(many) And None of this covers Collections and Private concerns..
Take 10 channels and all the shows created on Tape and film, esp those old theater shows..
Take those 1 time per week shows and show them Every day..and you will SHOW a whole series in a few months to 1 year... A series that last 10 years will be over in 1 year. 1 season will end in 1 month..
the odds are that you could show everything from the original creators in a few years..what was created over 50 years of time.
As TV and movies were created, more companies created, we get More every year..MANY movies never hit the theaters, Direct to DVD means they didnt think they had much chance to make extra money..(love the tremors series)..
Allot more people had access and could create a FAIR movies and publish it...
Even with all the extra movies/series and what ever created anew...the most you would cover would be around 5-7 years of TV time..
And now you know why you see the same CRAP on TV..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Consumer demand??
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's not correct. Espn lost 10 million subscribers. Only a small percentage of subscribers actually watch the channels.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ground shifting beneath their feet
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ground shifting beneath their feet
Think about the money they spent, to kill ALL the others from having access to the events. Its F'ing stupid. We might as well be paying the $200 to get a seat.
WHICH is another stupid thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]