Atlanta Prosecutor Sues DOJ For Blocking Investigation Of Incident Where Cops Shot A Man 59 Times
from the 92-bullets,-875-days dept
A case that involves some shocking numbers has resulted in a lawsuit against the DOJ. An investigation into a raid that ended with law enforcement officers putting 59 bullets into the body of an Atlanta resident has dead-ended and it appears to be because the DOJ doesn't want to talk about it.
Jamarion Robinson, a 26-year-old student and football player at Clark Atlanta University, was shot and killed by a team of local and federal officers who broke down the door to his girlfriend’s apartment on Aug. 5, 2016, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in Atlanta federal court by the office of Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard.
The DA says he has repeatedly attempted to work with the DOJ to obtain the personnel files and training materials of the officers responsible for Robinson’s death, all to no avail.
“It has now been 875 days since the officers killed Mr. Robinson, and the DOJ has yet to provide any of the documents or evidence requested and has failed to provide any investigative reports relating to Mr. Robinson’s death,” the complaint states.
The opening of the DA's lawsuit [PDF] doesn't explain what Atlanta prosecutors did for the first 275 days, but it does point out the DOJ has been blocking this investigation for nearly two years at this point.
Having been stymied for more than 600 days from receiving any documents from the Department of Justice related to the shooting of Jamarion Robinson, Plaintiff Office of the Fulton County District Attorney (“Plaintiff” or “the District Attorney”) brings this action against Defendant United States Department of Justice (“Defendant” or “the DOJ”) to compel compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”).
This FOIA lawsuit is only part of the federal government's problems. The family of Jamarion Robinson has also sued the officers involved in the shooting, which includes the US Marshals Service. This lawsuit appears to be on hold at the moment as everyone suing over the shooting attempts to obtain documents related to Robinson's killing.
The numbers mentioned above -- 59 bullet holes, 600 days of DOJ stonewalling -- are just part of the picture. There's also the number of officers involved and the number of bullets expended to take the life of someone law enforcement apparently had little reason to suspect might respond violently.
On August 5, 2016, 14 law enforcement officers from eight separate local municipal police departments, along with at least one United States Marshal, traveled to the Parkside Camp Creek Luxury Apartments in Atlanta, Georgia to execute a State of Georgia arrest warrant for Jamarion Robinson (hereinafter “Mr. Robinson”). The state arrest warrant alleged that Mr. Robinson committed an aggravated assault in violation of Georgia Code Annotated 16-5-21, a state crime. Mr. Robinson was not charged with any federal crime, and there was not a federal arrest warrant pending for Mr. Robinson.
The DA's lawsuit notes Robinson's only legal problem up to this point was a traffic violation. It also points out Robinson suffered from schizophrenia, which might explain his uncharacteristic decision to allegedly point a gun at police officers (and three tenants of a nearby apartment) days before he was gunned down in his apartment. Supposedly, Robinson fired a shot (or three shots… depending on which statement you read) at the officers attempting to serve a warrant which apparently justified this response.
[T]he officers knocked down the door to the apartment and immediately commenced firing approximately 51 shots from outside into the apartment without any known provocation and with reckless disregard for the safety of anyone else in the apartment and surrounding apartment units.
The officers then entered the apartment and fired approximately 41 additional shots from weapons, including a 9mm submachine gun, a .40mm submachine gun, and a .40 Glock pistol.
After officers fired more than 90 bullets into Robinson's apartment, some claimed Robinson fired at them first. But statements made by other officers and the results of the ensuing search punch holes in this narrative.
At the conclusion of the shooting, a firearm was located, which the officers claimed that Mr. Robinson fired at them three times. However, when the firearm was recovered, it was damaged and inoperable. Moreover, in an investigative report completed by Officer Steve Schreckengost, he did not state that the officers entered the premises because Mr. Robinson was shooting. Rather, Officer Schreckengost claims they entered to protect others inside the apartment from Mr. Robinson, although it was clear from their surveillance no one else was in the apartment.
They wanted to "protect" others from Robinson, but no one involved was interested in Robinson's safety. The team of officers was aware of Robinson's mental health issues and had spoken to his family prior to the raid. But not a single member of the 14-person, multi-office "task force" did anything that might have resulted in a peaceful arrest, like ask for advice, assistance, or third-party search consent from Robinson's family or his current roommate.
Six hundred days of DOJ stonewalling roughly aligns with the agency's reshuffled priorities following Trump's presidential win. The incoming AG (Jeff Sessions) yanked funding from the DOJ's civil rights department and said the agency would no longer be investigating the actions of local law enforcement. If there are any documents to be obtained from the DOJ, they're likely in the process of being massaged into exonerative shape before being released.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: atlanta, doj, evidence, jamarion robinson, police shootings
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Do they know what they are doing?
So...my question is, is the DOJ licensed to operate a massage parlor?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
'Documents? No idea what you mean.'
If there are any documents to be obtained from the DOJ, they're likely in the process of being massaged into exonerative shape before being released.
Assuming they aren't accidentally deleted by a 'computer glitch' or 'routine maintenance' anyway. The fact that they are completely stonewalling like this leads me to suspect that they are hiding some pretty damning information, and I wouldn't put it past them to destroy it before it can be pried loose.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 'Documents? No idea what you mean.'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Do they know what they are doing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What shape was that again?
More like into "shredded shape," probably.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Charge them with murder
2. Present evidence (unarmed man shot 59 times).
3. They release evidence against or go to jail.
4. Profit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Read for content...
This is a Prosecutor suing the DoJ for FOIA paperwork.
Not a Defense Attorney. A State Prosecutor.
Fourteen officers from EIGHT jurisdictions, including "at least one Federal Marshal".
To serve an Ag Assault warrant? A Task Force doesn't get assigned to people who have a police record of a single traffic ticket.
Not only is it a task force, but according to the article at least two full automatic weapons, a 9mm and a .40, were issued to the officers tasked with executing the Warrant. That's a ton of paperwork, and not something done for a simple aggravated assault warrant pickup.
HAS the DoJ stonewalled them, or simply claimed they don't have anything? They will not release any information on anyone in the Marshal Service. What could they have on members of seven local jurisdictions?
Did the Prosecutor file fourteen requests, one for each involved officer, or a single filing? If it was a single filing, he's not going to get an answer other than "this is fourteen requests misfiled as one".
The story here is what lead up to a Marshal and seven police jurisdictions being issued automatic weapons to execute a simple arrest warrant, not that a Prosecutor can't get records from the DoJ that they likely don't even have.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Charge them with murder
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A .40mm submachine gun?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
How's that Keith Lipscomb fund of yours coming along, bro?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Read for content...
Also: Why is the DoJ the apparent repository of responsive documents here? What the hell about every other police force involved? One US Marshal, and ... the DoJ just took everything connected?
Further, when cops fire that many rounds, do they ever consider that shit like gypsum board does not stop a fucking bullet?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Read for content...
Consider that there are fourteen LEO's, spanning seven police jurisdictions and a Federal Marshal involved.
Nobody likes cops. Especially other cops. Cops themselves especially despise anyone with power over them - like Federal Marshals.
WHAT caused the formation of this supposed "Task Force" to serve a STATE-issued Warrant for an Ag-Assault Arrest?
SOMETHING had seven Police Captains (or higher) order these officers to work with the other jurisdictions?
WHY was a Federal Marshal involved *at all*?
WHO issued submachineguns to these officers? That isn't something done lightly - I don't think I've ever even heard a rumor of such being done before, even when SWAT teams were involved.
We'll likely never know - this reeks of "national security" being behind it. I can't think of any other power that would force so many jurisdictions to work together over something so apparently banal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A 40mm submachine gun??? 40mm is a fucking gernade launcher caliber. There'd be nothing left of the scene.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It does smack of a mob-style hit.
It does affirm that law enforcement conducts itself and should be regarded as an organised criminal syndicate.
We'll probably need to organized another such mob to displace them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Charge them with murder
Seeking the personnel records of those LEO's is stupid -- they are not evidence of the crime, even if completely turned over to that DA.
Obviously that DA totally lacks "primary" evidence of a crime and can not succeed in court.
Prosecuting any LEO's anywhere is unusual and rarely successful. DA needs at least one of those LEO's to come clean and testify against the shooters. That ain't gonna happen.
Justice fails frequently in the American system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Typo in the caliber...
It's a typo, silly!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Read for content...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for content...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Read for content...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Typo in the caliber...
Really? No shit, genius?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 5th, 2019 @ 12:05pm
The world's smallest machine gun. I suspect they meant .40cal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 5th, 2019 @ 2:54am
I do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 5th, 2019 @ 12:05pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
40mm is an anti-tank cannon.
.40 cal is uncommon for handguns. The military likes .45 automatics for their service sidearms. Then .44 magnums are big in Hollywood for loose-cannon don't-play-by-the-rules action-hero cops.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Read for content...
Either way, pretty disheartening any government would act this way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A .40mm submachine gun?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It does smack of a mob-style hit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 40mm is an anti-tank cannon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
One trillion bullets
Huh. I thought the step down from .45 was 9mm which is pretty closer to 0.357 cal. Shows what I know.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pretty closer
Posting before coffee again.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: One trillion bullets
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: One trillion bullets
According to WP, they use .45, .40, and 9mm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_pistol#Modern_issue
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 40mm is an anti-tank cannon.
The military has not used .45 on a regular basis since the mid 1980's, when it switched to the 9mm Beretta M9.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: 40mm is an anti-tank cannon.
If you have a reference for that you might consider updating the Wikipedia article. It indicates the M1911A1 in .45 ACP is still in use, with a citation needed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Service pistols
It's more complex than that (so I'm learning!) in fact, for many duties, service sidearms are being phased out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Governors mistress or something?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for content...
So it seems likely that an officer died that we don't know about. Perhaps an undercover officer?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]