Turkish Court Says Government's Two-Year Ban Of Wikipedia Violates Freedom Of Expression Rights
from the I-see-you've-made-your-ruling.-Now-let's-see-you-enforce-it. dept
The world's second-largest jailer of journalists -- Recep Erdogan's Turkish government -- has just been pushed back against ever so slightly by the country's Constitutional Court. The government's long-running ban of Wikipedia has been overturned, the Associated Press reports.
Turkey’s highest court on Thursday ruled in favor of Wikipedia, saying the Turkish government’s two-year ban on the online encyclopedia constitutes a violation of freedom of expression, the state-run news agency reported.
This ruling is somewhat of a surprise, given the authoritarian stance of the government. This ruling is also no-brainer, but one probably viewed by President Erdogan as redundant. Of course, it's a violation of free speech rights. That's what it was intended to be.
The government's ban of Wikipedia began in April 2017 when the site refused to remove content the Turkish government claimed was a "threat to national security." This included content suggesting Turkey's government supported ISIS and other terrorist groups. When Wikipedia refused to engage in censorship on the Turkish government's behalf, the government pulled the plug on all versions of Wikipedia.
Two years later, Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia petitioned the European Court of Human Rights, asking for a ruling reversing the ban and declaring it a violation of rights. Wikipedia has now secured a ruling doing these things, albeit from a court few people expected to side with the site. However, it may have been ECHR pressure that motivated this ruling. The ECHR expedited Wikipedia's case, giving the Turkish government until the end of 2019 to justify the ban.
Apparently, no justification has been found. But this is only the beginning. The court has made its ruling. But the only thing that does -- at least at this point -- is keep the ECHR from handing down yet another judgment against Turkey. Not that those rulings have had any effect on the way the Turkish government goes about its business.
The ECHR has ruled against Turkey more than any other country. Ankara routinely ignores verdicts, choosing instead to pay court-ordered fines.
If it can ignore the European court, it can certainly ignore its own Constitutional Court. The ban may never be lifted. Erdogan seems willing to keep cutting checks if it helps keep pesky constituents in line and the government firmly in control of the narrative.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ban, censorship, cjeu, eu, free speech, recep tayyip erdogan, site blocking, turkey, web block, wikipedia
Companies: wikimedia
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
authoritarian government
so court court rulings and classic rule of law structure are irrelevant in authoritarian governments. who_knew?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How can he think that when he has to play whack a mole censoring people? Is he delusional?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We all know Golom Recep Tayyip Erdogan is thin skinned and petulant enough to keep writing checks to pay the fines, especially when it's not his money he's spending.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Honestly, I'm as surprised as you
The ECHR has ruled against Turkey more than any other country. Ankara routinely ignores verdicts, choosing instead to pay court-ordered fines.
Financial penalties in order to compel compliance/punish non-compliance with court orders doesn't work when the target isn't the one personally on the hook for them, who could have ever imagined that?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"Is he delusional?"
As are all dictator wanna-bees
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No it's not. Not from his perspective, at least. He's an Islamist politician; from his point of view there's no such thing as "free speech rights", and thus no violation thereof.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wikipedia ruling
What is these "constitution" and "laws" words that you speak of, american?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wikipedia ruling
Yeah, turkey does not have a constitution do they?
Constitution of Turkey
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Wikipedia ruling
'Have' and 'follow' can be two very different things.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Wikipedia ruling
Agreed.
Are there any countries that follow their own rules .. as in equal enforcement regardless of class, position, authority, party, etc
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So?
This just tells us which judges will be incarcerated for supporting terrorism/Gülen soonish.
[ link to this | view in thread ]