Amazon Tells Ukraine Publication To Alter Its Article After It Links The Company To Ring's Problematic Ukraine Branch
from the burnt-by-your-own-source dept
An extremely-problematic wing of an extremely-problematic company is back in the news. Ring's Ukraine division made headlines last fall when the presence of a "Head of Facial Recognition Tech" in the Ukraine office appeared to contradict Ring's claims it was not interested in adding facial recognition to its cameras.
More disturbing news surfaced earlier this month, when it was discovered this office had allowed its employees to view Ring camera footage uploaded by users. Ring doesn't just produce doorbell cameras. It also sells in-home cameras, making this revelation particularly worrying.
Beginning in 2016, according to one source, Ring provided its Ukraine-based research and development team virtually unfettered access to a folder on Amazon’s S3 cloud storage service that contained every video created by every Ring camera around the world. This would amount to an enormous list of highly sensitive files that could be easily browsed and viewed. Downloading and sharing these customer video files would have required little more than a click. The Information, which has aggressively covered Ring’s security lapses, reported on these practices last month.
Not only did the R&D team have complete access to customers' recordings, so did Ring's US-based engineers and executives. And who knows how many other people have accessed these recordings illicitly? When this access was granted to an untold number of Ring employees, Ring did not encrypt uploaded recordings. The company apparently felt encryption was too expensive to implement and would possibly limit revenue opportunities for the company as it aggressively moved into the home security market.
It turns out the company was using customers' footage to train its AI to recognize faces and other objects. This would be the same facial recognition Ring swears it isn't going to be implementing anytime soon.
Apparently, this abuse of trust has resulted in growth opportunities for Ring-Ukraine. A recent article by Ukranian publication Vector stated the office would be lending its expertise to other Amazon products, which possibly includes Rekognition, Amazon's homegrown facial recognition program.
But that story was buried by Amazon PR shortly after it appeared, according to Sam Biddle of The Intercept.
I asked multiple Amazon representatives and Ring’s head of communications about the Vector article, including specifically what were the “many other Amazon projects” Ring’s Ukrainian staff now worked on.
Although Amazon ignored repeated requests for comment and Ring refused to discuss the subject on the record, it seems that the company did take action: Within hours of my inquiries, the text of the Vector piece was quietly edited to remove references to Amazon. Most notably, the entire quoted sentence about the “many other Amazon projects” the Kyiv office was working on was excised.
The author of the story told The Intercept he had nothing to do with the belated deletion. In fact, he was not aware of any editing until The Intercept brought it to his attention. An email from Vector's editor-in-chief explained the situation, although not all that satisfactorily.
We published a news about rebranding, later pr-manager of Ring Ukraine called me and asked to take Amazon mention out from the article. Since I had a good relationship with manager, the article got just several dozens of views and I understood that everyone know that Ring is part of Amazon anyway, I didn’t even asked questions, said ok and took Amazon part out
It appears Amazon doesn't want people to know it has given a problematic division even more responsibility. It also may be trying to head off another Ring-related PR nightmare by removing any text that might suggest Ring customer recordings are being used to train facial recognition software used by government agencies.
But it's too late to change public perception. The scrubbing may keep Amazon from being linked to unfettered access to Ring camera recordings in search results, but there's no separating Amazon from Ring. And there's nothing here that suggests either company is moving away from leveraging user-generated content to fine-tune AI for the customers they really want: law enforcement agencies.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, ring, ukraine
Companies: amazon, ring
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I hope they at least believe their excuse...
Since I had a good relationship with manager, the article got just several dozens of views and I understood that everyone know that Ring is part of Amazon anyway, I didn’t even asked questions, said ok and took Amazon part out
If 'everyone already knows' then exactly what was the problem with leaving the references to Amazon in again? The only reason to remove that bit of information is to prevent people from realizing that the two are linked, and/or avoid highlighting it so those that might have forgotten aren't reminded and in turn don't remember some other articles/claims regarding the two.
The idea that Amazon scrambled to have the article edited because they didn't want parts of it to be redundant is just laughably weak, and has all the hallmarks of an excuse that was not thought out before being offered.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Neat, we exported the Streisand Effect to Ukraine!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ring spyware
Owned and operated by Amazon. Time for everyone to buy Jeff Bezos masks...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ring spyware
eeewwwwwww
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ЯꚄФГИЇТЇФИ
Sounds like all that Ring data is hosted on Amazon.nyet
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That bar man
Companies like IBM used to get crucified by the public when they'd do stuff like this. They'd feel shame, and go into hiding for a few years. Exxon, same thing. Now? They just call up Michael Bloomberg and Jeff Bezos and Jeff Zucker and makes sure the story gets killed, like Bezo's cheating on his wife for example.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That con man
Which was all over the news for quite a while..so..how about another example that actually happened?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: That con man
For two days, and got downplayed. He literally did exactly what trump did, but didn't get two months of coverage.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: That con man
OH, and HAHAHHAHAHA how short is your memory? Remember a guy named Epstein that somehow Epstein'd himself?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gee, it’s almost as if Bezos wasn’t running for the most powerful political office in the country~. Imagine that~.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They don’t call people like Bloomberg and Bezos. They call people like McConnell and Trump — because no one runs more defense for corporations than Republican politicians.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: That con man
It’s almost like you’re extremely stupid AND way out of date.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: That dipshit man
Better than zoffing yourself bro.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: That con man
Downplayed?
I see you don't really understand news-cycles, especially in regards of the difference between a person who is a CEO and someone who is running for president.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: That con man
So there where no news-stories about Epstein you say?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If you install a camera in your home and uploads its video to some storage location that you dont control then you are an absolute idiot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ring under direct instructions from Amazon keeps ALL the footage.
And has sold this to criminal organizations, terrorists, chinese governments tracking down dissidents who've escaped the hellhole that china has become under President Pooh and vice-president Eyore.
Who'd be stupid enough to even OWN a ring camera? only a braindamaged tub of yogurt.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wait til you see how Amazon has linked alexas sound device via Ring.
They re-package sound data as (what would appear to be scrambled) video data and have Ring pump that continuously to Amazon's datacentres, where it's turned back into sound.
In this way, if you check the traffic from Alexa on your home network, you won't see Alexa sending ANY sound files at all until it's woken with the keyword.
Even though it's recording 24/7, and bypassing regular checks, hiding the data in the MUCH larger ring dataflow.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You could zoom the cam in on a little stage and perform little plays with stick figures and claymation.
Oh No Mr. Bill !
[ link to this | view in thread ]
For a few dollars more...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hacker
CONTACT US FOR ALL KINDS OF HACKING JOB @ glenfthomas@gmail.com TEXT ON (770) 824-6784 We offer professional hacking services
[ link to this | view in thread ]