ICE The Latest Agency To Be Blessed By The Administration With The 'Security Agency' Accountability Shield
from the secure-from-the-public's-interest dept
ICE has joined Customs and Border Protection as a full-fledged security agency. ICE, like the CBP, has been hoping to upgrade from customs enforcement to NatSec machinery for several years now, possibly with an eye on backdoor-searching all the communications and data the NSA hoovers up.
CBP moved another step closer to becoming part of the Intelligence Community earlier this year when its employees were given the Office of Personnel Management's prized "security agency" designation. This means identifying information about CBP employees will be almost impossible to obtain through FOIA requests. Since CBP officers are now security agency officers, America would apparently be less secure if the public were able to find out which officers in particular are doing bad things while being paid US tax dollars.
Ken Klippenstein, who broke the news about the CBP's new accountability shield, has obtained another leaked memo. This one says ICE is now playing on the same opaque field as its cohort in immigration enforcement.
On June 11, the administration classified ICE as a “Security Agency,” according to a memo signed by [ICE chief Matthew] Albence and dated June 26. This new designation puts ICE employees in the same category as high-level intelligence officials, and blocks from disclosure information that is typically public, such as name, job title, and salary. The memo was provided to The Nation by an ICE official on condition of anonymity. The memo states:
I am pleased to announce that on June 11, 2020, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) approved ICE’s request to be identified as a “security/sensitive” agency for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) purposes. This designation will ensure that OPM withholds all relevant personally identifiable information (PII) of all ICE personnel where it processes FOIA requests moving forward, just as it does for other law enforcement agencies and federal prosecutors.
According to Klippenstein, the memo written by Albence refers to this distancing of ICE from the public it serves as a "tremendous achievement." But it's not really clear what's been achieved here, other than making ICE as insulated from accountability as other "security" agencies like the FBI and Secret Service. Whatever the internal rationalizations behind the decision, the implications for the public are clear: ICE can now withhold all information about its employees under FOIA Exemption 6.
The memo justifies ICE's upgrade to "security agency" by citing nothing at all.
The memo claims the classification is necessary to protect its staff from increased threats in recent years, saying:
The increase in threats, intimidation, and doxing directed at ICE personnel in recent years underscored the need for this designation. Numerous examples of the harassment and threats you have had to endure were used to impress upon OPM that the ongoing disclosure of our employees’ identifying information under FOIA was simply unacceptable.
The memo provides no examples.
We, on the other hand, can provide plenty of examples of abuses committed by ICE employees, none of whom should be given an OPM-ordained accountability vacuum in which to operate. This ranges from deporting journalists for reporting on misconduct by ICE agents to engaging in abusive actions on almost a daily basis by ignoring the "worst of worst" directive in favor of cramming as many immigrants as possible into detention centers. Now, officers and agents participating in day-to-day misconduct have been given official assurance their misdeeds won't be linked to their names.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cbp, foia, ice, law enforcement, national security, security agency, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Welcome to the future if Trump remains president. No oversight or accountability.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This is different from previous administrations how exactly?
This went on under Obama's tenure as well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So much for 'Land of the free, hone of the brave'! What the hell sort of country are we allowing a certain power made, sick in the head bunch turn us into? And the more they do, the less we try to stop them or, in fact, are able to stop them! How can we even imagine us to be the fighters for, the saviours of freedom and the free world when we are being overtaken, overrun by those doing even worse deeds?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No oversight or accountability.
No oversight or accountability was typical during the Obama administration and the Bush administration.
And it will be again during a Biden administration.
Trump is looking to exploit it more for personal use and to victimize immigrants and marginalized groups, but will continue to be a problem with or without Trump.
The whole NatSec system needs to be abolished along with the entire justice system (including ICE and the CBP). We've tried reforming and it just doesn't work.
Burn it all down.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's worth noting the NSA and FBI went NatSec.
The NSA was supposed to secure communications but switched to trying to fight terror and engage in espionage by sabotaging communications.
The FBI was law enforcement. Now it's National Security and instead of going after Serial Killers and mass online fraud they gaslight dumb crazy people into remotely-terroristy entrapment scams.
This reminds me of the problems the USSR had with production, and how soon every department was looking for the lowest-hanging fruit that qualified as doing their job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just wondering..
Wasnt/isnt ICE a Private company??
Created from Blackwater, that has changed its name many times?
And the real problem I have with this group, is that they have been placed in charge of Many other Policing agencies, and Push hard to do MORE then they need.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just wondering..
No.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Blackwater
You're thinking of Academi that has, yes, changed its name several times.
And yes, ICE hires itself out to NGOs on occasion to enforce their will, as they did in the arrest of Kim Dotcom and the seizing of Florida electronics repair companies who were fixing iPhones without Apple's consent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Blackwater
So that makes them NOT Gov. controlled??
Or both Corp and gov?
WHICH I think is against the law also.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Government / Corporation segregation
I'm pretty sure we live in an age where those kinds of laws are only enforced it suits the agenda of a sufficiently powerful person.
That rule-of-law thing? Here in the US it's bullshit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's worth noting the NSA and FBI went NatSec.
NSA - the only government agency that actually listens
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Land of the fee, home of the slave
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Blackwater
Why do we need a private army?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Blackwater
To make a profit of course!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mercenaries
In the Iraq war, PMCs were used to engage in activities that we wanted to claim was not being done by the United States. It's much like our current situation where we use extraordinary rendition to take detainees to other nations where non-American nationals torture them. That way we can still claim America does not torture with plausible deniability.
For every US trooper or officer we have in theaters of war, we have three more who are private military contractors. The fighting they do, the casualties they take, the killing they do is reported at the discretion of the commanders. That way we can report low death rates even when they're not.
And when a PMC massacres a village or shoots a journalist, the United States has plausible deniability.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]