USPS Regrets Its Transparency, Asks FOIA Requester To Remove 1,200 Pages It Forgot To Withhold
from the please-double-check-your-work-for-accuracy dept
The government has fucked up and it thinks citizens are obligated to help it unfuck itself. We're not. Too bad.
Recently, government accountability nonprofit American Oversight obtained nearly 10,000 pages of memos and emails from the United States Postal Service. The documents dealt with the USPS's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike the USPS's effusive response to this FOIA request, the agency's response to complaints from employees about the danger they were facing was far more tepid.
These documents were shared with the Washington Post, which highlighted the Postal Service's scrapped plan to send every American five masks, as well as the internal turmoil that accompanied the spread of the coronavirus.
Apparently, the USPS had second thoughts about its FOIA response following this unflattering nationwide media coverage. It sent a letter to American Oversight asking it to take down every single one of the 10,000 pages it had given the organization.
UPDATE: USPS has now requested we pull down the records the agency had previously produced to us under FOIA. We have agreed to remove the records for 24 hours as we wait for USPS to specify which pages it believes should continue to be withheld.
— American Oversight (@weareoversight) September 17, 2020
If you can't read/see the tweet, it says:
UPDATE: USPS has now requested we pull down the records the agency had previously produced to us under FOIA. We have agreed to remove the records for 24 hours as we wait for USPS to specify which pages it believes should continue to be withheld.
The letter from the USPS said "multiple pages" were meant to be "withheld in full" under unspecified FOIA exemptions. It refused to say which pages were supposed to be withheld. Instead, the USPS demanded the entire set of documents be removed from American Oversight's website. As seen above, AO refused. It only removed pages that hadn't already been reported on by other news agencies and asked the USPS to be a bit more specific about which pages it felt should have been withheld.
The Postal Service responded the next day, saying it needed 1,200 pages redacted. That's the government's latest offer. For now, most of the 10,000 pages remain offline but still in the possession of American Oversight. 462 of those pages can be viewed online at AO's site.
The organization is continuing to work with the USPS to determine whether any more pages should be excised from the documents it received. But American Oversight is under no obligation to remove anything just because the USPS meant to withhold them. There's nothing illegal about possessing documents or other information the government has mistakenly released. This is an unforced error and if anything damaging was inadvertently released, the Postal Service has no one to blame but itself.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: foia, transparency, usps
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Embarrassment should have been redacted...oops
Just what does the USPS think should be classified about it's operations? Where or how they go about testing mail for bombs or ricin or other pathogens maybe (but is that really secret?), but could that take 1200 pages?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Embarrassment should have been redacted...oops
"classified", synonym "embarrassing"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, once we get the corrupt Trump/GOP cronies out of office, we can get the USPS back to its good old efficient self of decades past.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you think the federal government just now started sandbagging the USPS under Trump, you haven't been paying attention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The post office isn't going to start to be fixed until they stop being expected to fully fund the pensions of employees that haven't even been born yet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They made a mistake, too bad. I guess it helps foster a positive working relationship but on the other hand... US agencies so outright hostile and difficult to extract information on, I would hope 1200 pages don't actually get deleted because they might be important for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Somehow I have a feeling that American Oversight is waiting for those 1200 pages to be identified, so they can highlight them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not so much embarrassing to the USPS, but to the politically-appointed morons in charge of destroying - sorry, i meant to say running - it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]