Comcast Tells Customers They May Lose Access To Comcast Channels If Comcast Can't Agree With Comcast
from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept
Comcast is informing the company's 20+ million cable TV customers that they may lose access to Comcast TV channels next month if Comcast can't come to some sort of agreement with... Comcast.
It's an absurd twist on the already annoying practice of carriage disputes, where customers pay the price for broadcasters and cable TV providers being unable to come to terms on new agreements after old ones expire. Usually, this involves both the cable company and the broadcaster trying to get customers pissed at the other guy, despite both sides pursuing relentless rate hikes (be it for programming or cable set top box rental). Usually this results in outages that customers don't get refunds for, after which a new confidential deal is struck and consumer prices go up anyway.
While there have been some flimsy discussions about protecting consumers from these kinds of stand offs, not much comes of them. Matthew Keys notes how this particular standoff effectively involves Comcast bickering with itself (Comcast NBC Universal):
"But the Comcast situation is unusual because the cable giant owns NBC Universal and the channels that are slated to be dropped. The channels are carried under an agreement negotiated between the cable service and its subsidiary broadcast and cable network group.
“Comcast has successfully renegotiated thousands of expiring contracts over the years and rarely experienced an interruption of service,” a statement included with the notice said. “However, it is possible that contracts for the channels listed below will not be renewed, in which case Comcast would no longer have the right to carry those channels on our systems."
Needless to say, it's pretty likely that Comcast will be able to agree with Comcast before Comcast customers lose access to channels they pay for. And the notice was created because cable providers are legally obligated to inform customers of looming blackouts when a new contract hasn't been signed yet. But I think Cory Doctorow does a good job getting to the heart of this absurdism by noting its origins lie in trying to pretend that monopolistic business sectors are more competitive than they actually are, and creating the illusion that monopolies are good and efficient:
One of the arguments for permitting monopolies is that they are "efficient." That's the logic under which Universal was allowed to acquire Comcast and NBC - the "vertical integration" would make all three companies better and we'd all reap the benefit.
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) October 27, 2020
He also quite correctly notes that the performative nonsense (and unnecessary stress placed on the backs of customers during an already stressful time) is generated by a need to create the illusion of competition, but also to help set the rates Comcast gets to charge other, largely unaccountable media giants:
But it's not clear why it hasn't done so already, sparing the company the baffling humiliation of sending out these notices. Perhaps it's because the contours of the deal may affect its licensing rates to rivals like ATT-Time Warner.
7/
— Cory Doctorow #BLM (@doctorow) October 27, 2020
Either way, these fights have been getting increasingly worse over the last decade, with consumers routinely losing access to TV content they pay for -- and almost never getting a refund. Regulators in the Trump era effectively giving up on consumer protection hasn't helped. And while the added competition from streaming has helped matters somewhat, you can expect entirely new issues as the battle over gatekeeper dominance simply changes shape.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: carriage disputes, tv
Companies: comcast
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Reminds me of the old Lewis Black segment on The Daily Show where he played a bunch of clips of Fox News commentators ranting about the left-wing debauchery on the Fox network. He closed with a line that was something like "Thank God those fine, upstanding citizens at Fox are here to protect us from those godless commies at Fox."
(Course, that joke wouldn't work today, now that Fox News and 20th Century Television actually are completely separate companies.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On a similar note:
The other week I got an email from Hulu that my live TV package would have to not carry our local ABC channel anymore due to a contract dispute. Which makes almost as little sense to me cuz Hulu is owned by Disney, which owns ABC. Granted, a local affiliate probably has local ownership like a franchise, but still...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hulu is not entirely owned by Disney. It's actually 2/3 owned by Disney, but 1/3 owned by Comcast. Disney completely controls it, though: See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulu
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Ah. I thought Disney purchased that final slice of the Hulu pie, but I see per that article that the purchase is pending. Thanks for the correction.
Still, my point about the silliness of ABC affiliate vs. Disney controlled Hulu stands. I moved myself away from cable, yet still have the woes of cable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this just I will take money out of my left front pocket and then place it into my wallet and put it in my back pocket?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, this is, "I'm sorry, we're going to have to raise our rates because we've insisted on paying ourselves more money for our programming. It's out of our hands, because we wouldn't bend in dictating terms to ourselves. You'll have to take it up with us, not us."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reason #536 for cord-cutting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]