The Trouble with Stock Options

from the the-power-of-options dept

The Economist is running an article questioning the value of stock options that companies use to motivate their employees. My biggest problem with stock options is that it makes people focus solely on the short term performance of the companies stock, and has very little long term incentives. This is what the country was complaining about in the early 90s when there was all this fear that the US was losing its leadership position. The problem was we had too short term a focus. What that turned into worked out well in creating fast products on the internet, but some sort of long term focus is definitely needed (and is lacking in many cases). Update/apology: I don't post articles to techdirt that require you to pay to get in, and when this one was posted I could get in to the article just fine. I am not sure if that was just a fluke or something else, but since then I cannot get to the article again and I apologize for the link. I'm going to leave it up, however, as I think the topic is interesting. Update on the update: The article is now free for all again, so now you can click on it and go read it (supposedly) unless it's just another fluke...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Chris Hedemark, 9 Aug 1999 @ 4:26pm

    Pay-only articles

    Argh. Please don't post links to articles that require a paid subscription to read.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Mike (profile), 9 Aug 1999 @ 4:36pm

    Re: Pay-only articles

    Well, now that is ODD. I don't have a subscription to the Economist, and I swear that half an hour ago that article was not pay only. I got in and read it just fine. Yet, now it's asking me to register...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Vincent W. Yin, 9 Aug 1999 @ 10:33pm

    Stock option cost

    The most worrying thing the article points out really ins't short-term outlook IMHO, it's that the options aren't properly accounted for as costs and therefore make the profitability of the company look better (and hence the shares to rise).

    A paraphrase from Warren Buffett:

    If options aren't compensation, what are they? If compensation isn't an expense, what is it? If expenses aren't counted towards earnings, where are they counted?

    (from memory, so please excuse slight wording inaccuracy)

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.