MS Decision Analysis

from the it's-all-wrong dept

Here's Jerry Pournelle's analysis of the Microsoft decision. I tend to disagree with a lot of Pournelle's opinions, but this article is very thorough and makes a lot of good points.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Joe Mahoney, 8 Nov 1999 @ 9:27pm

    Jerry's right but there's more to it than OS/2, Ma

    Jerry covers a lot of ground in his article. He puts the death of OS/2 in it's proper perspective - no developers, no apps. Same with the Mac.

    IMHO, Netscape didn't concentrate on their crown jewels enough. They stopped making the browser the number one priority and got bogged down with Netcaster and server software. As a company they grew too big, too quickly. MS didn't help by offering IE for free, but it wasn't the big hinderance. And it was possible to have Netscape as the default browser on a Win98 machine.

    But I believe MS have been abusive. Their dealings with OEMs like Compaq, Dell, and hundreds of smaller companies made it uneconomical to put other OSes on PCs. Why bother to load OS/2 when you have to put on Windows anyway?

    It's that kind of behaviour, the details of which we haven't really seen that MS should be stopped from doing. Perhaps the results of this trial will see that happen.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.