I know how to fix all of this. Fire anyone using personal email/phones for work. Don't allow email to be viewed without a government laptop and don't let personal email be viewed by it. Same with phones. There are companies with less to protect that the government who have these rules in place. THIS INCLUDES ELECTED OFFICIALS AND THEIR STAFF!!
It's Crazy Eddie's blowout sale! All Warrants are half off!! No evidence? NO PROBLEM! No morals? NO PROBLEM! Breaks constitutional rights? We can approve you today! Coming soon, you will be able to approve them yourself!! So come on down to Crazy Eddie's Warrant sale happening now!
On a hunch, I also searched the last 2 towns I lived in, not my name but the town/state. 1 of the people listed is serving a 10 year prison sentence without access to the internet. It has only been 2 years, either he got out really early or he didn't actually post it.
What I like is there are numerous posts with my name from different states but they all say the same thing (so far I found about 50 of them)
"The Obama-era FCC regulations known as "Title II" enable the federal government to exert an extraordinary and unnecessary amount of regulatory control over the internet. This bureaucratic overreach impedes innovation, stifles investment and continues to create economic uncertainty for one of the largest sectors of the U.S. economy. I support Chairman Pai's proposal to roll back Title II and restore the sensible regulatory framework that enjoyed broad bipartisan consensus and enabled the internet to thrive for more than two decades. I strongly urge all of the FCC Commissioners to support the Chairman's proposal to repeal the harmful Title II internet takeover."
My name comes up several times but not my location. What I find funny is my name comes up several times with identical posts on different days and from different states
The easiest way to debunk this: If you are going to follow it, why get rid of it?
If you truly are going to follow it, you will be at a disadvantage because others won't be. You would soon be pushed out and have to sell your company to those who are not playing by the rules you set for yourself. At this point, you have spent so much on getting a law repealed that it killed you once you got what you asked for. Sadly, I feel, there are enough people in this country to believe this.
Ummm, the current president is not Hilary. Please re-read what you quoted. "current presidential faves" Meaning, the CURRENT president likes these groups. Go back to your bigot loving life. Stop pretending you are being any more than a moronic troll.
There is a big difference between Apple hacking it's phones and Blackberry doing it. Now take this with a grain of salt as I have not worked with BB servers in a long time.
BB owns servers. Someone sends an email from their phones, it goes through a server owned by BB and then to the server of the company, assuming they have one. Same goes in reverse when email is sent to a user. This allows BB to open the server and have access to mail as it comes through. They can hack it from there (assuming the servers can't already open them from within.)
Apple does not have their own servers. They would need to go to the phone or the company's email system
So, when the "non-official" account causes millions to die because it got us into a nuclear war, Can Trump be tried for war crimes? Mass genocide of his own people.
Where MS might be to blame for shoddy design, that "feature" was put there for making updating the BIOS easier for users not overly confident in doing so the old fashion way. Where yes, MS has had issues with their OS, this one indeed was requested by many hardware providers for this purpose. MS is simply guilty for failure to test and secure it. Lenovo is far more to blame as it forced bloatware on to people's computers no matter what they did. You could uninstall it, it would just reinstall after the next reboot. You could format the drive and put another copy of windows on the system and it would then load the bloatware. No need to use their version of OS that way.
On the post: Senate IT Tells Staffers They're On Their Own When It Comes To Personal Devices And State-Sponsored Hackers
FFS this is NOT rocket surgery.
On the post: Disrupting The Fourth Amendment: Half Of Law Enforcement E-Warrants Approved In 10 Minutes Or Less
No morals? NO PROBLEM!
Breaks constitutional rights? We can approve you today!
Coming soon, you will be able to approve them yourself!!
So come on down to Crazy Eddie's Warrant sale happening now!
*No restrictions apply
On the post: Now That The FCC Is Doing Away With Title II For Broadband, Will Verizon Give Back The Taxpayer Subsidies It Got Under Title II?
On the post: Comcast Busted For Signing People Up For Services They Didn't Want, Never Asked For
Re: Re:
On the post: Months Later, And People Are Still Discovering Their Dead Loved Ones Were Used To Support Killing Net Neutrality
Re:
On the post: Months Later, And People Are Still Discovering Their Dead Loved Ones Were Used To Support Killing Net Neutrality
"The Obama-era FCC regulations known as "Title II" enable the federal government to exert an extraordinary and unnecessary amount of regulatory control over the internet. This bureaucratic overreach impedes innovation, stifles investment and continues to create economic uncertainty for one of the largest sectors of the U.S. economy. I support Chairman Pai's proposal to roll back Title II and restore the sensible regulatory framework that enjoyed broad bipartisan consensus and enabled the internet to thrive for more than two decades. I strongly urge all of the FCC Commissioners to support the Chairman's proposal to repeal the harmful Title II internet takeover."
On the post: After Investigating Itself, CenturyLink Proclaims There's Just No Way It Committed Billing Fraud
On the post: FCC Boss Lies Again, Insists Net Neutrality Harms The Sick And Disabled
Just saying.
On the post: New York AG Provides Tool To Help You Check If Your Name Was Used To Support Killing Net Neutrality
On the post: Comcast Spent Millions Repealing Net Neutrality, Now Wants You To Believe It Won't Take Full, Brutal Advantage
If you truly are going to follow it, you will be at a disadvantage because others won't be. You would soon be pushed out and have to sell your company to those who are not playing by the rules you set for yourself. At this point, you have spent so much on getting a law repealed that it killed you once you got what you asked for. Sadly, I feel, there are enough people in this country to believe this.
On the post: Giant International Egos May Derail The Sprint T-Mobile Merger
On the post: Report Finds DHS Terrible At Keeping Track Of Agents' Badges And Guns
Re:
On the post: Report Finds DHS Terrible At Keeping Track Of Agents' Badges And Guns
Re:
On the post: BlackBerry CEO Promises To Try To Break Customers' Encryption If The US Gov't Asks Him To
BB owns servers. Someone sends an email from their phones, it goes through a server owned by BB and then to the server of the company, assuming they have one. Same goes in reverse when email is sent to a user.
This allows BB to open the server and have access to mail as it comes through. They can hack it from there (assuming the servers can't already open them from within.)
Apple does not have their own servers. They would need to go to the phone or the company's email system
On the post: Lawyers: Trump's Twitter Account Not Presidential; Also: Trump Is President, Can't Be Sued
On the post: GAO Will Investigate The FCC's Dubious DDoS Attack Claims
On the post: British News Channel Touts Amazon Bomb Materials Moral Panic That Ends Up Being About Hobbyists And School Labs
On the post: Desperate To Stop Leaks, The Trump Administration Considers Moving From Bad Ideas To Worse Ones
On the post: Comcast Sues Vermont, Insists Having To Expand Broadband Violates Its First Amendment Rights
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How's that saying go, "If you don't like the terms..."
On the post: The $3.5 Million Check Comes Due for Lenovo And Its Security-Compromising Superfish Adware
Re: "bloatware via BIOS"
Next >>