So why is 5G network coverage so sparse? It turns out, there is a reason.
It is little known, yet well established that AT&T representatives are carefully disguised to have the form and appearance of ordinary human beings.
Due to lack of sufficient testing early on, it escaped AT&T's notice that 5G network signals interfered with the disguise making it possible for some people to perceive the true form and nature of their representatives. Because of this, AT&T representatives need to avoid being in areas where 5G signals are present. Thus it makes sense to ensure that 5G coverage is in as few areas as possible, and to manipulate other major carriers to do likewise.
In the meantime marketing will work on hype for a new 6G network so that the entire 5G debacle can be swept under the rug as quickly and quietly as possible.
You read it on the intarweb tubes. So it MUST be true!
Why is 5G network coverage so sparse? It turns out, there is a reason.
It is little known, yet well established that AT&T representatives are carefully disguised to have the form and appearance of ordinary human beings.
Due to lack of sufficient testing early on, it escaped AT&T's notice that 5G network signals interfered with the disguise making it possible for some people to perceive the true form and nature of their representatives. Because of this, AT&T representatives need to avoid being in areas where 5G signals are present. Thus it makes sense to ensure that 5G coverage is in as few areas as possible, and to manipulate other major carriers to do likewise.
In the meantime marketing will work on hype for a new 6G network so that the entire 5G debacle can be swept under the rug as quickly and quietly as possible.
You read it on the intarweb tubes. So it MUST be true!
<no-sarcasm>
Police have no right to complain about this.
They brought it on themselves.
At first they think they can bend the rules a little bit. Then a bit more. Then bend and stretch the rules until we're now miles and miles away from where we started. Then the courts step in and correct that.
Courts only uphold rights when the cops have gone so far over the line that there needs to be a fence erected to protect everyone. They have only themselves to blame.
Because someone has to police the police. When that becomes necessary one has to wonder if we would be safer without police.
</no-sarcasm>
The Organ cops have the right to seize your internal vital organs and those of your passengers. Otherwise, you are free to go. You agreed to this as one of the conditions of obtaining a driver license.
Your organs might be guilty and must be seized until you can prove otherwise, at which point your organs or reasonably equivalent replacements might be returned.
The Organ Cops are difficult to spot because they have the ability to take human form.
Law enforcement, via facial recognition, can now know everyone who lives at, or visits, any physical address.
Think about that for a second.
You think it is scary that Facebook has "the social graph" of who is connected to who is connected to who. Cops now have the physical social graph. Who goes to who's house. And how often. Average time of day visited.
With a bit more AI, police could recognize if people bring certain types of recognizable items into their own homes. Things that maybe they should not have. Like video cameras that can be used to commit criminal public photography. Or outright criminal items such as skateboards. OMG!
When police need to know where someone with a criminal record lives, just run their mugshot through the AI to see what physical locations they've visited recently.
We need encryption that is totally secure. Cannot be broken.
But upon presentation of a judicial warrant, it becomes insecure. It only reacts this way to 'genuine' judicial warrants created with good intentions that truly would further the cause of justice. The algorithm can determine whether the intentions are pure or not.
On the post: Wireless Carriers Are Training Consumers To Equate "5G" With Bluster And Empty Promises
Don't panic!
6G won't be bluster and empty promises.
The marketing department is hard at work developing 6G as we speak.
On the post: Bill Barr Excises 'Attorney' From His Title As He Leads Our Nation's Police Soldiers Into The War At Home
Re: Re: Don't laugh
Lowering the Barr is the result.
Raising the Barr was the intention.
On the post: Bill Barr Excises 'Attorney' From His Title As He Leads Our Nation's Police Soldiers Into The War At Home
Don't laugh
To compensate for the administrations efforts, he's just trying to raise the Barr.
On the post: State Court Says It Isn't Theft To Remove An Unmarked Law Enforcement Tracking Device From Your Car
NEVER return it!
If it had been so labeled, and you returned it, suppose it were a bomb intended for the sheriff's office, and you delivered it there?
On the post: Law Enforcement Official Claims Citizens Use Better Encryption Than Cops Do
"Encryption like that"
Do they use Windows PCs? Do they turn on BitLocker? Then they ARE using "encryption like that".
On the post: AT&T's Attempt To Dominate The Pay TV Sector Continues To Go...Poorly
But they ARE dominating Pay TV
AT&T is dominating the parts of pay TV that cuts the cord.
Just as Comcast dominates in customer service.
On the post: The 'Race To 5G' Is A Giant Pile Of Lobbyist Nonsense
Why is 5G coverage so sparse?
So why is 5G network coverage so sparse? It turns out, there is a reason.
It is little known, yet well established that AT&T representatives are carefully disguised to have the form and appearance of ordinary human beings.
Due to lack of sufficient testing early on, it escaped AT&T's notice that 5G network signals interfered with the disguise making it possible for some people to perceive the true form and nature of their representatives. Because of this, AT&T representatives need to avoid being in areas where 5G signals are present. Thus it makes sense to ensure that 5G coverage is in as few areas as possible, and to manipulate other major carriers to do likewise.
In the meantime marketing will work on hype for a new 6G network so that the entire 5G debacle can be swept under the rug as quickly and quietly as possible.
You read it on the intarweb tubes. So it MUST be true!
On the post: Immunity Just Barely Denied To Cop Who Claimed Driving A Beat-Up Car And Paying For Purchases Is Suspicious Behavior
Being a cop is suspicious behavior
Being a cop is suspicious behavior
On the post: There's A Recurring Theme With 5G, And It's Disappointment
Why is 5G coverage so sparse?
Why is 5G network coverage so sparse? It turns out, there is a reason.
It is little known, yet well established that AT&T representatives are carefully disguised to have the form and appearance of ordinary human beings.
Due to lack of sufficient testing early on, it escaped AT&T's notice that 5G network signals interfered with the disguise making it possible for some people to perceive the true form and nature of their representatives. Because of this, AT&T representatives need to avoid being in areas where 5G signals are present. Thus it makes sense to ensure that 5G coverage is in as few areas as possible, and to manipulate other major carriers to do likewise.
In the meantime marketing will work on hype for a new 6G network so that the entire 5G debacle can be swept under the rug as quickly and quietly as possible.
You read it on the intarweb tubes. So it MUST be true!
On the post: George Gershwin's Rhapsody In Blue Is In The Public Domain And Gerswhin's Nephew Is Worried Someone Might Turn It Into Hip Hop
I missed the resemblance
Do you mean United Breaks Guitars?
I fail to hear the resemblance.
On the post: TV Ratings Sag As Cord Cutting Continues To Surge
The Reason
The reasons TV Ratings sag:
The Ratings Drop is because people quit watching.
The Cord Cutting is because why pay for what isn't worth watching.
They have only themselves to blame.
On the post: UL Pushes Security Standards For The Internet Of Broken Things
Security by default
All of the Internet of Things (IoT) devices need to become the Security Hardened Internet of Things (SHIoT).
On the post: Oregon Cops Complain State Supreme Court's Traffic Stop Decision Is Making Their Job Harder
Re: Police Harder
<no-sarcasm>
Police have no right to complain about this.
They brought it on themselves.
At first they think they can bend the rules a little bit. Then a bit more. Then bend and stretch the rules until we're now miles and miles away from where we started. Then the courts step in and correct that.
Courts only uphold rights when the cops have gone so far over the line that there needs to be a fence erected to protect everyone. They have only themselves to blame.
Because someone has to police the police. When that becomes necessary one has to wonder if we would be safer without police.
</no-sarcasm>
On the post: Oregon Cops Complain State Supreme Court's Traffic Stop Decision Is Making Their Job Harder
Re:
The Organ cops have the right to seize your internal vital organs and those of your passengers. Otherwise, you are free to go. You agreed to this as one of the conditions of obtaining a driver license.
Your organs might be guilty and must be seized until you can prove otherwise, at which point your organs or reasonably equivalent replacements might be returned.
The Organ Cops are difficult to spot because they have the ability to take human form.
On the post: DHS Wanted To Add US Citizens To The Long List Of People Subjected To Mandatory Face Scans At Airports... But Has Backed Down For Now
Necessary Precaution
Face Scans at airports are for your own safety!
To protect you from "bad people". Terrible, horrible people who would violate your rights and restrict your freedom of movement and association.
On the post: Cops Are Running Ring Camera Footage Through Their Own Facial Recognition Software Because Who's Going To Stop Them
Freedom Of Association
Law enforcement, via facial recognition, can now know everyone who lives at, or visits, any physical address.
Think about that for a second.
You think it is scary that Facebook has "the social graph" of who is connected to who is connected to who. Cops now have the physical social graph. Who goes to who's house. And how often. Average time of day visited.
With a bit more AI, police could recognize if people bring certain types of recognizable items into their own homes. Things that maybe they should not have. Like video cameras that can be used to commit criminal public photography. Or outright criminal items such as skateboards. OMG!
When police need to know where someone with a criminal record lives, just run their mugshot through the AI to see what physical locations they've visited recently.
On the post: Interpol Confirms, Denies It's Against Strong Encryption
Re: Re: What we really need
function areIntentionsPure() { return false; }
On the post: Interpol Confirms, Denies It's Against Strong Encryption
What we really need
We need encryption that is totally secure. Cannot be broken.
But upon presentation of a judicial warrant, it becomes insecure. It only reacts this way to 'genuine' judicial warrants created with good intentions that truly would further the cause of justice. The algorithm can determine whether the intentions are pure or not.
On the post: Twitter And Instagram Both Begin Experiments In Decreasing The More Socially Questionable Incentives Of Their Platforms
Other improvements
Maybe Twitter could detect if someone is tweeting under the influence.
But then what some might consider drunken insanity might be considered by others as highly insightful information.
What about detecing tweets by someone who cannot read, write, speak in complete sentences, or express coherent thoughts?
Oh, that might exclude certain unspecified world leaders from twitter.
On the post: Copyright Troll Lawyer Serves Up BS 'Dead Grandfather' Excuse For Missing Court; Now Facing Sanctions And Arrest
What if he brought his living grandfather to court?
Suppose he brought his living grandfather to court with him?
Look! It's a Miracle!
He's alive!
The judge should be so overwhelmed with joy that she will forget about needing to produce any documentation of his death now that he is alive again.
(If his grandfather is not available, some stand in actor would do.)
Next >>