You are still wrongfully taking that item/property (though it may just be a copy of that item)
Not to point out the obvious, but there's no 'taking and carrying away' being done here. There's carrying away, yes, but what's being carried away are copies.
And there's no taking (copying) of a copy either - it's pure copying.
But I suppose if we're going to compare definitions, then let's look at the one for 'copy' - "An imitation or reproduction of an original; a duplicate". Well fuck me, that sounds familiar. The trick is this - you have to interpret the definition of 'stealing' a certain way to make it fit whereas the definition of copying matches it perfectly.
All 15 of those Anti-Piracy Laws relate to Piracy. Yes, even the state immunity one - before, they couldn't be charged with copyright infringement and now they can. How is that not related to piracy?
What if 100 people came to your show opening and 91 of them decided to steal one of your paintings off the wall? Then what? Paint faster to keep up with the demand?
You're out of songs to sell because people stole them all? Tell you what: just send me an mp3 and I will gladly reproduce it for cheap, just for you!
Huh, don't know the guy but I think I'm going to go download everything he's ever done because I can and he's really not winning my heart with the whole 'you're stealing my music!'. In fact, every time an artist says I 'steal' their music, I go download it. Several times, if necessary.
What I kept thinking throughout reading that is "if the MAFIAA sees this and goes 'waaaaaahh! He's getting our stuff for free! We need to stop him!' then they should just remember - the power sides with the pirates. Not the creators. If you don't do things the way they want, that's your problem - they have control"
My physics teacher taught with his eyes closed. But he was so awesome, he has a Facebook page dedicated to him. Not to mention his surname was (and still is) Killer.
Because God FORBID a workplace should be airy, welcoming and fun. We all know a workplace should be grey cubicle after grey cubicle, full of suits and ties, stuffy, boring, grey..
However, I was pointing out how few (i.e. zero) legal and legitimate alternatives there are by pretending to search on the MPAA/RIAAs search engine. As of yet, there are no legal downloadable copies of Game Of Shadows, even though it came out in cinemas last year (release windows and all that).
If MPAA/RIAA introduced their own search engine right this very second, there would be no results for Game Of Shadows. That's my entire point.
I would like to watch Game Of Shadows, as I enjoyed the first film. However, I didn't catch it in the cinema (possibly due to marketing failure as I didn't even know a sequel had been made). What's my legal choices? A Telesync, CamRip or... nothing.
You know.. I want them to infringe another time, just to see what they'd do. But I think I can guess - they'll say 'ahh, but we don't pirate stuff, which is what we meant when we introduced this law' and they'll just carry on as usual, giving strikes against people that make the same mistakes they did and you can bet your bottom dollar, when they get 3 strikes, they're outta here.
Long story short - HADOPI will hold itself above the law. I hope you Frenchies are up for some more protests :D
On the post: Guess What? Copying Still Isn't Stealing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: It can be.
On the post: UK Decides Hollywood, US Gov't's Interests More Important Than Own Citizens; Extradites Student For Linking
On the post: Guess What? Copying Still Isn't Stealing
Re: It is still theft...
Not to point out the obvious, but there's no 'taking and carrying away' being done here. There's carrying away, yes, but what's being carried away are copies.
And there's no taking (copying) of a copy either - it's pure copying.
But I suppose if we're going to compare definitions, then let's look at the one for 'copy' - "An imitation or reproduction of an original; a duplicate". Well fuck me, that sounds familiar. The trick is this - you have to interpret the definition of 'stealing' a certain way to make it fit whereas the definition of copying matches it perfectly.
On the post: Guess What? Copying Still Isn't Stealing
Re:
All 15 of those Anti-Piracy Laws relate to Piracy. Yes, even the state immunity one - before, they couldn't be charged with copyright infringement and now they can. How is that not related to piracy?
On the post: Guess What? Copying Still Isn't Stealing
Re: Re: Who's "Stealing" your stuff?
You're out of songs to sell because people stole them all? Tell you what: just send me an mp3 and I will gladly reproduce it for cheap, just for you!
You hit the nail on the head there..
On the post: Guess What? Copying Still Isn't Stealing
On the post: Forget Home Taping: Evil Robots Are Killing Music!
Re:
On the post: Forget Home Taping: Evil Robots Are Killing Music!
Re: Re:
On the post: QR Codes: Ugly, Overused and Doomed
Re:
http://wtfqrcodes.com/post/18795391232/this-is-even-dumber-than-that-guy-who-got-a-zune
On the post: An Open Letter To Content Creators: One 'Pirate' Explains Why He Infringes & How To Get His Money
On the post: Teaching Style, Not Computers, Appears To Be Biggest Factor In Classroom Distraction
On the post: The Future Of Journalism Doesn't Have A Head Office
On the post: The Future Of Journalism Doesn't Have A Head Office
Re: Redundant
Course it isn't. Because TD is a blog, not a news site.
On the post: Columnist Accuses EA Of 'Identity Theft' For Using Player Likenesses
On the post: Why Search Engines Can't Just 'Fix' Search Results The Way The MPAA/RIAA Want
Re: Re: Re:
However, I was pointing out how few (i.e. zero) legal and legitimate alternatives there are by pretending to search on the MPAA/RIAAs search engine. As of yet, there are no legal downloadable copies of Game Of Shadows, even though it came out in cinemas last year (release windows and all that).
If MPAA/RIAA introduced their own search engine right this very second, there would be no results for Game Of Shadows. That's my entire point.
I would like to watch Game Of Shadows, as I enjoyed the first film. However, I didn't catch it in the cinema (possibly due to marketing failure as I didn't even know a sequel had been made). What's my legal choices? A Telesync, CamRip or... nothing.
Have I made my point clear enough yet?
On the post: Why Search Engines Can't Just 'Fix' Search Results The Way The MPAA/RIAA Want
Re:
Showing results 0 of 0."
And they wonder why we pirate stuff..
On the post: RIAA's Cary Sherman: We Really Just Want To Give Consumers What We, Er, They Want
On the post: And This Little Piggy Went Viral
On the post: One More Copyright Infringement, And HADOPI Must Disconnect Itself From The Net
Re:
HADOPI has infringed copyright twice and by their own laws, have one chance left.
I fail to see how these two sentences are related (also, use-mention distinction).
On the post: One More Copyright Infringement, And HADOPI Must Disconnect Itself From The Net
Long story short - HADOPI will hold itself above the law. I hope you Frenchies are up for some more protests :D
Next >>