You haven’t been talking about paying to use software—you’ve been talking about stopping people from using software of any kind to create new cultural works and having them executed (in deed or in spirit) for daring to violate copyright. We can all read your comment history, dude. Hell, here’s a list of positions you’ve either implied or outrighted stated you hold within at least the past year:
You want people barred from making anything that could potentially infringe on an existing copyright from anywhere in the world
You want copyright violators to be fined billions of dollars for even a single infringement—an amount of money that no average person could possibly pay
You’ve expressed absolutely no opposition to the idea of people being executed by the government for either violating copyright in and of itself or being unable to pay those multi-billion-dollar fines
You believe software that allows for user input should be able to automagically detect even the slightest amount of copyright infringement during the act of content creation or else that software shouldn’t exist
Corollary: You believe all software that allows for user input should kneecap its primary functionality if it can’t be made to detect copyright infringement; e.g., a word processor program shouldn’t let anyone type into it for fear that whatever they type will infringe upon someone’s copyright somewhere on Earth
You believe your Meshpage application can and will be able to prevent all copyright infringement despite Meshpage being unable to stop you from infringing on a copyright held by game developer Scott Cawthon
You believe your infringment of Scott Cawthon’s copyright should be excused from the same punishments you would have the government enact upon everyone else because… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You believe corporations that would slit your throat without a second thought and immediately ask you to pay for having their clothes cleaned of your blood deserve the absolute and unassailable right to control copyright law worldwide until the heat death of the universe
You believe open source projects and projects with more than one developer working on them should be annihilated for the good of mankind
You believe the public domain should be annihilated for the good of all mankind
You believe all humanity should be annihilated, period
Granted, I might be exaggerating your positions, but not by all that much. And none of that gets into your unproven claims of basically having invented more mobile phones and gadgetry than anyone else alive.
You are a deranged, delusional, likely-suffering-from-dementia lunatic. You take no offense to, and possibly even celebrate, being called a Nazi. No one else who comments here is anywhere near as batshit insane as you are, and one of the usual trolls is a guy who keeps claiming to be on the verge of suing this site into a crater (among the more…personalized threats of violence he’s made over the years). I know this is absolutely ludicrous coming from me, a guy with a shitload of mental problems of his own, but trust me when I say this, Tero: Log off of your computer, go touch grass for a few hours, then seek some serious therapy from a trained and accredited psychiatric professional.
Please, help yourself before you wreck yourself, you genocidal Nazi fuckwit.
The verdict was going to be appealed regardless of whether the jury agreed with the judge. You don’t actually think she’s going to accept this L with grace and dignity, do you?
It’s kind of hilarious in a mundane way: Given the chance to detail the kind of speech you feel is under threat from government censorship, you pivot to directly threatening my First Amendment rights because…reasons.
Did you fix up a room for me in your head before or after I started living there rent-free? 😁
And when no one but a couple of corporations can pay for the privilege of being able to create new artistic works without having to worry about being executed for doing so—a concept which you appear to wholeheartedly endorse, you Nazi fuck—creative expression will have been shut down anyway.
The biggest problems with this kind of data, at least as you’re reporting it:
Consider the likely source and of course you’d be right to doubt it.
It doesn’t necessarily define what an “ambush attack” is, which means what does and doesn’t count can be fudged to make the stats seem more inflated (or deflated).
It doesn’t tell us how many officers died as a result of those attacks, how many of the attackers died as a result of police retaliation, or the number of people were killed by the police compared to the number of police officers killed in “ambush attacks”.
Now, if the report actually does lay out the info I’m talking about in points 2 and 3, cool, let’s see it. But otherwise, I’m not inclined to trust that information any farther than I can throw a printout of that report.
Better question to ask Brainy Smurf is how he squares his support for copyright-driven censorship with his opposition for corporate censorship, since corporations are the entities that most often employ copyright-driven censorship.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar's Next Unconstitutional Speech Control Bill: The NUDGE Act
Yeah, this isn’t an Applebee’s.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
And you’re avoiding all of mine, you genocidal Nazi fuckwit.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar's Next Unconstitutional Speech Control Bill: The NUDGE Act
Sir, I’m afraid you can’t leave that much straw on the floor without being a fire hazard.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
You haven’t been talking about paying to use software—you’ve been talking about stopping people from using software of any kind to create new cultural works and having them executed (in deed or in spirit) for daring to violate copyright. We can all read your comment history, dude. Hell, here’s a list of positions you’ve either implied or outrighted stated you hold within at least the past year:
You want people barred from making anything that could potentially infringe on an existing copyright from anywhere in the world
You want copyright violators to be fined billions of dollars for even a single infringement—an amount of money that no average person could possibly pay
You’ve expressed absolutely no opposition to the idea of people being executed by the government for either violating copyright in and of itself or being unable to pay those multi-billion-dollar fines
You believe software that allows for user input should be able to automagically detect even the slightest amount of copyright infringement during the act of content creation or else that software shouldn’t exist
Corollary: You believe all software that allows for user input should kneecap its primary functionality if it can’t be made to detect copyright infringement; e.g., a word processor program shouldn’t let anyone type into it for fear that whatever they type will infringe upon someone’s copyright somewhere on Earth
You believe your Meshpage application can and will be able to prevent all copyright infringement despite Meshpage being unable to stop you from infringing on a copyright held by game developer Scott Cawthon
You believe your infringment of Scott Cawthon’s copyright should be excused from the same punishments you would have the government enact upon everyone else because… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You believe corporations that would slit your throat without a second thought and immediately ask you to pay for having their clothes cleaned of your blood deserve the absolute and unassailable right to control copyright law worldwide until the heat death of the universe
You believe open source projects and projects with more than one developer working on them should be annihilated for the good of mankind
You believe the public domain should be annihilated for the good of all mankind
Granted, I might be exaggerating your positions, but not by all that much. And none of that gets into your unproven claims of basically having invented more mobile phones and gadgetry than anyone else alive.
You are a deranged, delusional, likely-suffering-from-dementia lunatic. You take no offense to, and possibly even celebrate, being called a Nazi. No one else who comments here is anywhere near as batshit insane as you are, and one of the usual trolls is a guy who keeps claiming to be on the verge of suing this site into a crater (among the more…personalized threats of violence he’s made over the years). I know this is absolutely ludicrous coming from me, a guy with a shitload of mental problems of his own, but trust me when I say this, Tero: Log off of your computer, go touch grass for a few hours, then seek some serious therapy from a trained and accredited psychiatric professional.
Please, help yourself before you wreck yourself, you genocidal Nazi fuckwit.
On the post: Judge And Jury Say Sarah Palin Failed To Prove 'Actual Malice' In Defamation Case Against The NY Times
The verdict was going to be appealed regardless of whether the jury agreed with the judge. You don’t actually think she’s going to accept this L with grace and dignity, do you?
On the post: Judge And Jury Say Sarah Palin Failed To Prove 'Actual Malice' In Defamation Case Against The NY Times
An important question:
Can we all finally agree to make her politically and culturally irrelevant again if she loses all of her appeals?
On the post: EARN ITs Big Knowledge 1st Amendment Problem
It’s kind of hilarious in a mundane way: Given the chance to detail the kind of speech you feel is under threat from government censorship, you pivot to directly threatening my First Amendment rights because…reasons.
Did you fix up a room for me in your head before or after I started living there rent-free? 😁
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
And when no one but a couple of corporations can pay for the privilege of being able to create new artistic works without having to worry about being executed for doing so—a concept which you appear to wholeheartedly endorse, you Nazi fuck—creative expression will have been shut down anyway.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Then why do you want to use copyright as a means of shutting down literally every form of creative expression?
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
You’re not just a Nazi, you’re a gigantic dumbass. You actually believe suing people will turn them into customers.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Why do you think you should have the right to both metaphorically and literally kill your competition?
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Oh, if only he were a cultist. Then at least there’d be a chance of him drinking the Flavor-Aid.
On the post: Some Senators Are Freaking Out Because The White House Is Pitching Some Extremely Minor Police Reforms
The biggest problems with this kind of data, at least as you’re reporting it:
Consider the likely source and of course you’d be right to doubt it.
It doesn’t necessarily define what an “ambush attack” is, which means what does and doesn’t count can be fudged to make the stats seem more inflated (or deflated).
Now, if the report actually does lay out the info I’m talking about in points 2 and 3, cool, let’s see it. But otherwise, I’m not inclined to trust that information any farther than I can throw a printout of that report.
On the post: EARN ITs Big Knowledge 1st Amendment Problem
Better question to ask Brainy Smurf is how he squares his support for copyright-driven censorship with his opposition for corporate censorship, since corporations are the entities that most often employ copyright-driven censorship.
On the post: EARN ITs Big Knowledge 1st Amendment Problem
What speech are you worried will be taken down? Be specific.
On the post: EARN ITs Big Knowledge 1st Amendment Problem
Shut up, Wallace.
On the post: Court (For Now) Says NY Times Can Publish Project Veritas Documents
[credible citation of fact needed]
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Again, and see if you can answer the actual question this time: Why do you want people to die for violating copyrights?
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Nope, just working with what you give me, you Nazi prick.
On the post: Court (For Now) Says NY Times Can Publish Project Veritas Documents
Who gives a fuck what you think.
Next >>