Hmmm... A quick scan of the first couple of articles, shows her journalistic bent is toward bringing to light financial institution malfeasance.
It's too bad that she can't write too well, her spelling is atrocious, and her grammar leaves something to be desired. Oh, and her tendency to throw everyone under the bus, including those that are on her side.
Damn, boy: you sound like a hyperconservative bible-thumping closeted-gay freedom-hating constitution-shitting money-grubbing pageboy-molesting altar-boy-diddling patriarchal nazi zealot.
If I didn't know better, I'd think we were dealing with a republican...
Re: Re: Re: Interesting article from a Google Search - Teri Buhl idiot
That's just it: his brain isn't working, because all the blood flow went south when she dropped to her knees; so he's letting her do whatever she wants.
"Freedom of the press" also means the freedom to write what you want, how you want, when you want. It also means the freedom to read what you want, when you want, how you want.
Since freedom isn't "free", it comes with it responsibility: in this case, the responsibility of the author to make damned sure the facts are facts, the law is the law, and that the truth is being published, even if the author doesn't like it. As for the reader, her responsibility is to use sense in interpreting what is read, to question what she read, and to do so always, in order to help keep the journalists honest. So, just as journalists keep readers honest (it could be YOU on those pages), readers keep journalists honest as well, by questioning them and making them defend/justify/prove their assertions.
Teribuhl failed her profession and her readers, on all counts.
What you say PUBLICALLY has no protection whatsoever. You don't want it out there, being repeated/used/seen/etc, then DON'T. FUCKING. SAY. IT.
If you send me an email with a trade secret accidentally, then the onus is on YOU to contact me to prevent said secret from getting out. I have no obligation to keep my trap shut, for any reason. YOU SENT IT TO ME. It was UNSOLICITED; and like getting an unsolicited package in the mail containing (say) a widget that's a trade secret (or even unpaid for), it does NOT mean I HAVE to do jack shit about it, including not reading/deleting/disseminating/paying for it. The law on unsolicited mail is VERY clear: you send it to me without me asking for it, and what happens after I get it is up to ME, and if you don't like it, tough.
"Hi! I'm Teri Buhl; and I'm a copyright troll, IP extortionist, and an alleged journalist. I have also expanded out to include pedo-stalker, trust-wrecker, life-destroyer, and journal theif.
"I am a psychosociopath who will stop at nothing to get what I want. If I'm being nice to you, you should watch your ass, because I'm about to rip something out of it that you might not want exposed.
"Please forward all correspondence to my associopath lawyers, who will just sue you for everything, and make us rich. And don't ask for mercy or understanding: I don't care, I'd just as soon eviscerate you as look at you. I only want your money.
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Translated statement:
On the post: Games Workshop Proves It Would Rather Bully Authors Than Be A Culture Participant
Re: Games Workshop
On the post: Games Workshop Proves It Would Rather Bully Authors Than Be A Culture Participant
Re: Nice try, but...
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Freedom of the press
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Re:
Start a nice White House petition!!
On the post: Investigative Journalist Claims Her Public Tweets Aren't 'Publishable;' Threatens To Sue Blogger Who Does Exactly That
It's too bad that she can't write too well, her spelling is atrocious, and her grammar leaves something to be desired. Oh, and her tendency to throw everyone under the bus, including those that are on her side.
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
We'll know for sure when she goes to prison, and AJs posts drop off suddenly...
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If I didn't know better, I'd think we were dealing with a republican...
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: "Rapeutation"
Awesome!
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Re: Interesting article from a Google Search - Teri Buhl idiot
At least, it SEEMS that way. o_O O_o
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Freedom of the press
Since freedom isn't "free", it comes with it responsibility: in this case, the responsibility of the author to make damned sure the facts are facts, the law is the law, and that the truth is being published, even if the author doesn't like it. As for the reader, her responsibility is to use sense in interpreting what is read, to question what she read, and to do so always, in order to help keep the journalists honest. So, just as journalists keep readers honest (it could be YOU on those pages), readers keep journalists honest as well, by questioning them and making them defend/justify/prove their assertions.
Teribuhl failed her profession and her readers, on all counts.
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re:
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re:
Slimy troll is slimy.
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re: Interesting article from a Google Search - Teri Buhl idiot
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Translated statement:
Can we PLEASE spell "aggregator" correctly?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggregator
THANK YOU
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Re:
On the post: Teri Buhl Responds To Our Story; Still Confused About The Internet And The Law
Re: Keep it coming
On the post: Investigative Journalist Claims Her Public Tweets Aren't 'Publishable;' Threatens To Sue Blogger Who Does Exactly That
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: This reminds me
If you send me an email with a trade secret accidentally, then the onus is on YOU to contact me to prevent said secret from getting out. I have no obligation to keep my trap shut, for any reason. YOU SENT IT TO ME. It was UNSOLICITED; and like getting an unsolicited package in the mail containing (say) a widget that's a trade secret (or even unpaid for), it does NOT mean I HAVE to do jack shit about it, including not reading/deleting/disseminating/paying for it. The law on unsolicited mail is VERY clear: you send it to me without me asking for it, and what happens after I get it is up to ME, and if you don't like it, tough.
On the post: Investigative Journalist Claims Her Public Tweets Aren't 'Publishable;' Threatens To Sue Blogger Who Does Exactly That
Re: It's a trap!
On the post: Investigative Journalist Claims Her Public Tweets Aren't 'Publishable;' Threatens To Sue Blogger Who Does Exactly That
Re:
"I am a psychosociopath who will stop at nothing to get what I want. If I'm being nice to you, you should watch your ass, because I'm about to rip something out of it that you might not want exposed.
"Please forward all correspondence to my associopath lawyers, who will just sue you for everything, and make us rich. And don't ask for mercy or understanding: I don't care, I'd just as soon eviscerate you as look at you. I only want your money.
"Thank you for your coöperation!!
"Sincerely,
"Teri the Teribuhl"
Next >>