So does this mean if a company loses a patent due to an improper patent they can be held liable for it? That might be a way to curtail patents on everything.
I know it will be abused more than it will be useful but it is an interesting thought.
There is the problem. Not enough details to make any realistic expectations. If it can only come from a list of organizations then they have established a tiered copyright where the individual is not represented as well as the money bags fuel politicians.
If a business is a legal person under law does that mean we could apply this law to them? If so the copyright holder organizations may find themselves kicked off the internet for alleged violations.
Wouldn't it be funny to see a company get kicked off for 3 accusations? I think so.
It also demonstrates how unusable the idea is. If an employee from a work computer commits a violation the company as a legal person would be liable and thus get thrown off the inet.
On the post: New Industry Springs Up Overnight: Filing Patent Marking Suits Over False Patent Claims
Interesting thought.....
I know it will be abused more than it will be useful but it is an interesting thought.
On the post: Insult To Injury: Mandelson Wants Those Wrongly Kicked Off The Internet To Pay To Appeal
Re: Re: Businesses and Legal Status
On the post: Insult To Injury: Mandelson Wants Those Wrongly Kicked Off The Internet To Pay To Appeal
Businesses and Legal Status
Wouldn't it be funny to see a company get kicked off for 3 accusations? I think so.
It also demonstrates how unusable the idea is. If an employee from a work computer commits a violation the company as a legal person would be liable and thus get thrown off the inet.
Next >>