Re: There are GA Dems running against Collins and Loeffler
Whats fun?
that all I see adverted is the 2 Primary groups. And not the other 3 running in my state.
So, we get the 2 persons Most of us had No choice in choosing. And the other candidates are hidden behind the MONEY they arent spending, to stand out and to Show the states WHO is really running.
Also, its interesting that EACH person running has to register in Each state, at a COST to them.
What has happened to contracts when WE the people have to abid by them, but corps arent even monitored to get things DONE.
Let alone some idiot(s) does not know the differences between 56k, DSL, ISDN, Sat, Cable, Fiber.
So, in the background, in the last 40+ years the Old wired phone systems and Cable lines have NEVER been upgraded or re-enforced, modified, improved? Just barely keeping hte system working and keeping the poles up?
So, collecting profits, doing little to update hardware(not counting the inbed monitoring service called caller ID), Cutting Corners and employees over the years to get More Top wages(not savings to the customers). Just collecting the money. Even when the gov./State has paid them, more then 1 time with More consumer money.
And no one to monitor or enforce the contracts to GET THINGS DONE?? And no one has gone to jail?
This reminds me of the time a Mayor of a town, used up over $100,000 for his own use, got fired, but the STATE never took him to court to get the money back, OR take the $100,000 home he had built.
Considering they are so Pro-Corp, and most of them have paid into the system to Keep them around, to lower their taxes Even more.
Or are the corps, spending so much to keep them in office, USING consumer money that they have raised prices to a New high every few years.
If the consumer could Not use a service to Contest Where they are using their money to control the Gov. Do you think we could(?) or that it would have much affect? Most corps are so diversified that 1 business losing abit isnt enough to even bother them.
Their have to be some smart republicans, Someplace.
Or is it that it Dont matter? Which ever side is in office becomes the Money maker for the corps.
But for all the money given to the corps, its the consumers Paying for it.
Everyone understands How the Pharma industry works?
Where they take an Almost expired patent, and add 1 other drug to it and Have NEW patent, even tho both drugs are expired? Look up Mucinex(good drug with a time release).
What would happen if we opened ALL patents and Copyrights to this idea?
A new toy has 1 extra plugin on it and get a NEW patent. The Same TV/Monitor has 1 plug, and then 2 plugs, then More. And each one has a patent. $0.10 for each extra plugin, but a $50 dollar increase in price for EACH.
IF we go back to the old/original system, all those patents, china and other countries have, WILL EXPIRE and we can copy everything they have, bought, created, made NEW, updated.
Or do we want to THINK we are the smarter group, and think China and others WONT enforce Copyrights?
Defunct
After its dissolution in 1911, the original Standard Oil Co. split into Sohio (now part of BP); ESSO (now Exxon); and SOcal (now Chevron)
with the dissolution of the Standard Oil trust into 34 smaller companies, Rockefeller became the richest person in modern history
BP's origins date back to the founding of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1908, established as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil Company to exploit oil discoveries in Iran. In 1935, it became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company and in 1954, adopted the name British Petroleum.[8][9] In 1959, the company expanded beyond the Middle East to Alaska and it was one of the first companies to strike oil in the North Sea. British Petroleum acquired majority control of Standard Oil of Ohio in 1978. Formerly majority state-owned, the British government privatised the company in stages between 1979 and 1987. British Petroleum merged with Amoco in 1998, becoming BP Amoco plc, and acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol in 2000, becoming BP plc in 2001. From 2003 to 2013, BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia.
BP PLC, formerly called Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Ltd. (1909–35), Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, Ltd. (1935–54), British Petroleum Company Limited (1954–82), British Petroleum Company PLC (1982–98), and BP Amoco (1998–2000)
The Whole thing is about-
COPYRIGHTS
Not the products. Only the Rights to get paid by others who want to Make your product.
really sounds like a lazy job dont it.
But its been posted that China has been Buying allot of them up. and making their OWN.
The Mentality that the USA is the Only smart nation, or that Only the EU WHITE MAN has any smarts, is abit STUPID.
NONE of this was INSTANT. as MSN Bing has been around along time.
If you dont remember the Wars on the net, for chat progs, for search engines, for Movie/video sites, for everything that is THERE.
You are very young.
AND,
dealing with every nation that wants restrictions or limits on Adverts and search.
The legalities of Porn in every nation(even states)
Acknowledging that every nation has its OWN rules and trying to keep up with them.
Ask Bing, ask Yahoo, ask excite, ask compuserve, ask all of the ones LEFT that are battling the battle.
Goggle did something, and kept improving it. They have gone abit overboard, with adverts, and tracking. But HOW can it get worse?
LEt others into the system or create THEIR OWN.
90% of adverts is the advert. And then paying someone to broadcast it. If the others want in,m let them try at a CHEAPER cost.
"And yes, there are reasonable concerns about copycats, but copycats are what drive innovation. "
It also forces the originator to make a GREAT product at a reasonable price, and someone will make it Cheaper, and worse quality, and it falls apart.
But also, someone might make it more reasonable, and abit cheaper, but it only lasts ?? 1year, not 10 years.
IF they really want it, give it to them.
Which of these companies do you want to pay?
Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba, Philips, samsung. They all worked on it. but I will BET that no one is paying them royalties.
And I really cant believe there have been that many REAL NEW developments from the USA.
The only reasoning I can see is to demand for rights, after its all gone from China and others that have advanced PAST those old developments.
"undergirding the American economy like Standard Oil and the AT&T telephone monopoly. "
Anti-competitive or NOT wanting to compete? Wont spend the money to compete? Wants to keep the High CEO/OWNER profit margins? Dont understand whats needed to compete with companies that have been there 20+ years ALREADY.
These are bill collectors rather then developers.
Standard oil? Look that up, please. They just change their name every time something bad happens. I think their current name is BP(?).
ATT, is funny. It divided up into many little companies and then played a game of WHO owns WHOM. A card game between 4-5 corps, buying back and forth until it was so confusing, even the gov. hasnt figured it out yet.
"demand the logging of user login info and passwords,"
And who gets to decide the name and password?
Are they taking pictures of the users? Mathcing them to the accounts?
HOw many accounts can you make with New/different names and passwords?? All over France.
OR
Are you tagging each machine as it connects and reading internal data, and connecting it threw GMAIL, Hotmail, and soforth?
Horrendous idea.
That would be so Cool, and logical. But dont think they did it that way.
Ask the other countries to match USA pollution laws, Adjust wages to a comparable level as WE would pay our own employees.
Then ask the USA corps what they want to do.
No matter what you do with a tariff it comes back to the consumer. And the only reason for a tariff was to over price imported goods that compared/were equal to USA products. But we dont make many things anymore. Esp consumer based products.
And even if we did make them, most of the needed Parts tend to NOT be made in the USA, we end up Just putting things together with other nations parts.
And the people they hire to put things together are fast at small parts, mostly screws and nuts, the rest is automated.
On the post: Trumpist Republicans Latest Freakout A Total Self-Own, As They Reveal They Don't Read What They Tweet
Re: There are GA Dems running against Collins and Loeffler
Whats fun?
that all I see adverted is the 2 Primary groups. And not the other 3 running in my state.
So, we get the 2 persons Most of us had No choice in choosing. And the other candidates are hidden behind the MONEY they arent spending, to stand out and to Show the states WHO is really running.
Also, its interesting that EACH person running has to register in Each state, at a COST to them.
On the post: Cuomo's NY Broadband Pledge Under Audit After Coming Up Short
what happened?
What has happened to contracts when WE the people have to abid by them, but corps arent even monitored to get things DONE.
Let alone some idiot(s) does not know the differences between 56k, DSL, ISDN, Sat, Cable, Fiber.
So, in the background, in the last 40+ years the Old wired phone systems and Cable lines have NEVER been upgraded or re-enforced, modified, improved? Just barely keeping hte system working and keeping the poles up?
So, collecting profits, doing little to update hardware(not counting the inbed monitoring service called caller ID), Cutting Corners and employees over the years to get More Top wages(not savings to the customers). Just collecting the money. Even when the gov./State has paid them, more then 1 time with More consumer money.
And no one to monitor or enforce the contracts to GET THINGS DONE?? And no one has gone to jail?
This reminds me of the time a Mayor of a town, used up over $100,000 for his own use, got fired, but the STATE never took him to court to get the money back, OR take the $100,000 home he had built.
On the post: Trumpist Republicans Latest Freakout A Total Self-Own, As They Reveal They Don't Read What They Tweet
Re: I wonder about the republicans.
Its asif, we are canceling our OWN votes.
On the post: Trumpist Republicans Latest Freakout A Total Self-Own, As They Reveal They Don't Read What They Tweet
I wonder about the republicans.
And Who pays their bills.
Considering they are so Pro-Corp, and most of them have paid into the system to Keep them around, to lower their taxes Even more.
Or are the corps, spending so much to keep them in office, USING consumer money that they have raised prices to a New high every few years.
If the consumer could Not use a service to Contest Where they are using their money to control the Gov. Do you think we could(?) or that it would have much affect? Most corps are so diversified that 1 business losing abit isnt enough to even bother them.
Their have to be some smart republicans, Someplace.
Or is it that it Dont matter? Which ever side is in office becomes the Money maker for the corps.
But for all the money given to the corps, its the consumers Paying for it.
On the post: Jeffrey Toobin's Zoom Dick Incident Is The Perfect Example Of Why We Need Section 230
Re: Re:
What is her name, Again please?
De sire..
Address?
1234 n. Cocksure drive.
Phone??
555-1212.
Thanks.
On the post: Federal Officers Are Still Struggling To Find Evidence Of A Massive Antifa Conspiracy
Dont need over time
"tax dollars working overtime "
I just want it to work the ways its supposed to.
On the post: Watch Out: The Patent Maximalists Are On The Warpath To Destroy Innovation And Empower Patent Trolls
So, what is happening.
Everyone understands How the Pharma industry works?
Where they take an Almost expired patent, and add 1 other drug to it and Have NEW patent, even tho both drugs are expired? Look up Mucinex(good drug with a time release).
What would happen if we opened ALL patents and Copyrights to this idea?
A new toy has 1 extra plugin on it and get a NEW patent. The Same TV/Monitor has 1 plug, and then 2 plugs, then More. And each one has a patent. $0.10 for each extra plugin, but a $50 dollar increase in price for EACH.
IF we go back to the old/original system, all those patents, china and other countries have, WILL EXPIRE and we can copy everything they have, bought, created, made NEW, updated.
Or do we want to THINK we are the smarter group, and think China and others WONT enforce Copyrights?
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Re: Re: Why?
Defunct
After its dissolution in 1911, the original Standard Oil Co. split into Sohio (now part of BP); ESSO (now Exxon); and SOcal (now Chevron)
with the dissolution of the Standard Oil trust into 34 smaller companies, Rockefeller became the richest person in modern history
BP's origins date back to the founding of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in 1908, established as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil Company to exploit oil discoveries in Iran. In 1935, it became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company and in 1954, adopted the name British Petroleum.[8][9] In 1959, the company expanded beyond the Middle East to Alaska and it was one of the first companies to strike oil in the North Sea. British Petroleum acquired majority control of Standard Oil of Ohio in 1978. Formerly majority state-owned, the British government privatised the company in stages between 1979 and 1987. British Petroleum merged with Amoco in 1998, becoming BP Amoco plc, and acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol in 2000, becoming BP plc in 2001. From 2003 to 2013, BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia.
BP PLC, formerly called Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Ltd. (1909–35), Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, Ltd. (1935–54), British Petroleum Company Limited (1954–82), British Petroleum Company PLC (1982–98), and BP Amoco (1998–2000)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bp-and-iran-the-forgotten-history/
Have a quick read. its part of it.
On the post: Watch Out: The Patent Maximalists Are On The Warpath To Destroy Innovation And Empower Patent Trolls
Re: Did you miss an argument?
Can I give you another?
The Whole thing is about-
COPYRIGHTS
Not the products. Only the Rights to get paid by others who want to Make your product.
really sounds like a lazy job dont it.
But its been posted that China has been Buying allot of them up. and making their OWN.
The Mentality that the USA is the Only smart nation, or that Only the EU WHITE MAN has any smarts, is abit STUPID.
On the post: Watch Out: The Patent Maximalists Are On The Warpath To Destroy Innovation And Empower Patent Trolls
Re: Re: Another opinion
That is the key.
The COPYRIGHTS.
Public or private.
Who makes the money on Copyrights.
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Re: Re: Re: Re: Worth reading the complaint
same as paulT said,
NONE of this was INSTANT. as MSN Bing has been around along time.
If you dont remember the Wars on the net, for chat progs, for search engines, for Movie/video sites, for everything that is THERE.
You are very young.
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Re: Worth reading the complaint
AND,
dealing with every nation that wants restrictions or limits on Adverts and search.
The legalities of Porn in every nation(even states)
Acknowledging that every nation has its OWN rules and trying to keep up with them.
Ask Bing, ask Yahoo, ask excite, ask compuserve, ask all of the ones LEFT that are battling the battle.
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Re: Re: Worth reading the complaint
it means Someone else isnt willing to take the time and effort Google has done.
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Re: Pretty Clear
Its just that google hasnt Paid enough to Lobbyists, that Pay to the Senate and Congress.
Thats all.
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Re: Re:
But have you compared MSN.
HORRIBLE.
Goggle did something, and kept improving it. They have gone abit overboard, with adverts, and tracking. But HOW can it get worse?
LEt others into the system or create THEIR OWN.
90% of adverts is the advert. And then paying someone to broadcast it. If the others want in,m let them try at a CHEAPER cost.
On the post: Watch Out: The Patent Maximalists Are On The Warpath To Destroy Innovation And Empower Patent Trolls
Another opinion
"And yes, there are reasonable concerns about copycats, but copycats are what drive innovation. "
It also forces the originator to make a GREAT product at a reasonable price, and someone will make it Cheaper, and worse quality, and it falls apart.
But also, someone might make it more reasonable, and abit cheaper, but it only lasts ?? 1year, not 10 years.
IF they really want it, give it to them.
Which of these companies do you want to pay?
Sony, Panasonic, Toshiba, Philips, samsung. They all worked on it. but I will BET that no one is paying them royalties.
And I really cant believe there have been that many REAL NEW developments from the USA.
The only reasoning I can see is to demand for rights, after its all gone from China and others that have advanced PAST those old developments.
On the post: Bill Barr's Google 'Antitrust Inquiry' Is A Weaponized Farce
Why?
"anticompetitive practices. "
"undergirding the American economy like Standard Oil and the AT&T telephone monopoly. "
Anti-competitive or NOT wanting to compete? Wont spend the money to compete? Wants to keep the High CEO/OWNER profit margins? Dont understand whats needed to compete with companies that have been there 20+ years ALREADY.
These are bill collectors rather then developers.
Standard oil? Look that up, please. They just change their name every time something bad happens. I think their current name is BP(?).
ATT, is funny. It divided up into many little companies and then played a game of WHO owns WHOM. A card game between 4-5 corps, buying back and forth until it was so confusing, even the gov. hasnt figured it out yet.
On the post: Five Bar Owners Arrested In France For Not Logging Internet Use By Patrons Using Bars' WiFi Connections
Re: Maybe...
Consumer routers kinda SUCK. And cant handle more then a few connections at 1 time.
A good shop should have 10+ connection possible.
On the post: Five Bar Owners Arrested In France For Not Logging Internet Use By Patrons Using Bars' WiFi Connections
See any problems with this?>
"demand the logging of user login info and passwords,"
And who gets to decide the name and password?
Are they taking pictures of the users? Mathcing them to the accounts?
HOw many accounts can you make with New/different names and passwords?? All over France.
OR
Are you tagging each machine as it connects and reading internal data, and connecting it threw GMAIL, Hotmail, and soforth?
Horrendous idea.
That would be so Cool, and logical. But dont think they did it that way.
On the post: Employees Say Foxconn & Donald Trump's Wisconsin Factory Scam Was An Absurdist Hellscape
Would love to..
Ask the other countries to match USA pollution laws, Adjust wages to a comparable level as WE would pay our own employees.
Then ask the USA corps what they want to do.
No matter what you do with a tariff it comes back to the consumer. And the only reason for a tariff was to over price imported goods that compared/were equal to USA products. But we dont make many things anymore. Esp consumer based products.
And even if we did make them, most of the needed Parts tend to NOT be made in the USA, we end up Just putting things together with other nations parts.
And the people they hire to put things together are fast at small parts, mostly screws and nuts, the rest is automated.
Next >>