So what is the "right" policy? Take down El Cheetos ads and interfere with his campaign lies - and start vetting all political adds for your version of correct?
Or leave them all up and take flak for promoting falsehoods?
You seem to have the easy answer - Better Ethics. Somehow that would block all political ads, and most consumer goods as well I imagine.
No - it's a rhetoric used by right wing hate groups. Common Law Court being where they all gather to discuss how they are going to expose the jew conspiracy, and which trees are best for lynching. Seriously. This is Blue's doctrine.
And apparently one or more of the obsessed idiots are also failed Fanfic writers. So they blew a fuse when they saw anyone else getting published and recognized.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Say good-bye to any scraps of credibility
Ken was bringing up that the people in the Tweet had generated some controversy by posing at Bill Cosby's star on the Hollywood walk of fame and being asses.
"Because God told me vaccines are bad" somehow doesn't quite equate to "My (non-quack) doctor has sworn, under penalty of perjury, that my child will DIE if injected."
There are medical exemptions. They are legit. But most people who seek exemptions do so because of ignorance, not need.
Quack doctors writing blanket exemptions to anyone that asks should have their license revoked. (And possibly injected with multiple live samples of contagious diseases to make a point. (JK (Not)).
How does that stack up in court - "You can't use this street without proof of residence." Do those residents pay more taxes? Do they get a special government permit?
On the post: Elizabeth Warren's Feud With Facebook Over 'False' Ads Just Highlights The Impossibility Of Content Moderation At Scale
Re: Ads are not "At Scale"
So what is the "right" policy? Take down El Cheetos ads and interfere with his campaign lies - and start vetting all political adds for your version of correct?
Or leave them all up and take flak for promoting falsehoods?
You seem to have the easy answer - Better Ethics. Somehow that would block all political ads, and most consumer goods as well I imagine.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: Re: Darnit again
No - it's a rhetoric used by right wing hate groups. Common Law Court being where they all gather to discuss how they are going to expose the jew conspiracy, and which trees are best for lynching. Seriously. This is Blue's doctrine.
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/11/30/convictions-piling-against-common-law-crew
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Darnit again
if they listed that, he'd walk away with it every week.
Naw he'd still lose because of the way he posts from 20 different names and 50 different IPs.
Because he is a cowardly racist who can't show his face in public. His "Common Law" is just farmers getting together to lynch undesirables.
On the post: This Week In... Working Futures
Re: Re: Re:
And apparently one or more of the obsessed idiots are also failed Fanfic writers. So they blew a fuse when they saw anyone else getting published and recognized.
On the post: This Week In... Working Futures
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Robots. Sex. "Gary".
So you are saying that you wrote the Neteflix show about Robots and Sex. right on! Good show. But... Nothing constructive to add. Thanx!!
On the post: This Week In... Working Futures
Re: Re: Re:
Hey, allright, "Gary". Be loud and proud
Wow. Was that written in English? Right on! You still can't cite your site, right?
On the post: This Week In... Working Futures
Re:
Yes. Now please show us your much better site with all the much better news and super fanfic you've been writing since middle school, eh?
On the post: CBP Official Refuses To Give Journalist His Passport Until He 'Admits' He Writes 'Propaganda'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Propaganda
Even if what you say~wife beater, etc.- is true
Well lets' see, one of his ex wives said he arped her - under oath. He's been documented on cheating on his pregnant wife and paying hush money.
He got two fake deferments to avoid the draft. Bone spurs don't just go away in a couple of years.
Truth hurts, don't it? And the truth isn't defamation. Especially with a public figure who always brags about his fake accomplishments.
On the post: How A Key Story About The 1919 Black Sox Scandal Was Completely Made Up... Due To A Confused Understanding Of Copyright
Re: Since NOT a fact, it's a troll
Since NOT a fact, it's protected by copyright!
And it is also a falsehood. I forget - is that Slander or Libel to just make up fake crimes and provide bogus testimonial about them?
On the post: Anti-Safe Space Crusader Bret Stephens Apparently Needs A Safe Space: Backs Out Of Bedbug Debate
Safe as a bug in a rug...
On the post: Attorney Who Sued Grindr Responds Extremely Poorly To The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Her Section 230 Lawsuit
Re: Re: Re: Re: Say good-bye to any scraps of credibility
Ken was bringing up that the people in the Tweet had generated some controversy by posing at Bill Cosby's star on the Hollywood walk of fame and being asses.
On the post: Banksy's Fake Store Is An Attempt To Abuse Trademark Law To Avoid Copyright Law
Can't argue on this point
And, according to Banksy, "copyright is for losers."
IP is being used for censorship again. What a surprise.
On the post: Attorney Who Sued Grindr Responds Extremely Poorly To The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Her Section 230 Lawsuit
Re: Re: Say good-bye to any scraps of credibility
But remember
The only one being accused of date rape in that tweet was Bill Cosby, so what is your point? You hate lawyers?
On the post: The Ellen Show Issues Copyright Takedown On Transformative Video Commenting On Her Friendship With President Bush
Re: Re: Re: Re:
It isn't a new claim. And previous claimants haven't been sued for defamation. There is a case to be made.
Once again, "Not Convicted so you can't say it!" doesn't hold water.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/former-counterterrorism-czar-george-w-bush-committed-war-crime s_n_5b55a89fe4b086f60991aa84?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce _referrer_sig=AQAAAEXewqUvhU69civBFUBLqDbWA-CDs8oq4sLYKY6LHtTxwUxuM9crN3FzRR9UV-JE3mOupCAFrBhcpg03I7 NxHgSavhgnIWKwsPPu0uL2hnb0pPxNYyX-xq-B1Z3Is0DGWbnUktqivhdCqEYcvH6QhAYre7yP1dgJagc311yEEgeN
On the post: CBP Official Refuses To Give Journalist His Passport Until He 'Admits' He Writes 'Propaganda'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Propaganda
You have a serious case of trump derangement syndrome.
Everytime I post actual facts about Cadet Bonespurs, someone quips about TDS.
Seems like ignoring the facts is more deranged than being angry about his lies, doesn't it?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/08/12/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading- claims-over-days/
On the post: CBP Official Refuses To Give Journalist His Passport Until He 'Admits' He Writes 'Propaganda'
Re: Re: Re: Propaganda
Just yesterday Tim Pool ran a story
So this proves that Cadet Bonespurs is an honest man! Oh wait, he's still a liar, cheat, philanderer and wife beater.
But please - keep defending him!
On the post: CBP Official Refuses To Give Journalist His Passport Until He 'Admits' He Writes 'Propaganda'
Re: Prove Trump Wrong
https://www.factcheck.org/person/donald-trump/
"Lies better serve my business than any truth."
-Art of the Deal
On the post: CBP Official Refuses To Give Journalist His Passport Until He 'Admits' He Writes 'Propaganda'
Re: Propaganda
But since most people here believe their propaganda, there will be outrage.
"We here only believe StormFront and InfoWars!"
-Art of the Deal
On the post: FBI Director Deploys Straw Men While Calling For The End Of Straw Men Arguments In The Encryption War
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Back door vs. front door
"Because God told me vaccines are bad" somehow doesn't quite equate to "My (non-quack) doctor has sworn, under penalty of perjury, that my child will DIE if injected."
There are medical exemptions. They are legit. But most people who seek exemptions do so because of ignorance, not need.
Quack doctors writing blanket exemptions to anyone that asks should have their license revoked. (And possibly injected with multiple live samples of contagious diseases to make a point. (JK (Not)).
On the post: Why Navigation Apps, Working Properly, Can Make Traffic Flows Worse -- And What To Do About It
Seriously?
levying heavy fines for nonresident drivers
How does that stack up in court - "You can't use this street without proof of residence." Do those residents pay more taxes? Do they get a special government permit?
Next >>