Yeah,
I joined Parler and then read their Community Guidelines and went: Oy Vey. Why isn't there even one social media site that has NO Community Guidelines.. At least pretend there is Free Speech?
As an asshole/troll I had to join Parler. Yeah, I read their stupid Community Standards statement.
It's so sad to read a writer who thinks there is no censorship of conservatives on social media. It makes you wonder how someone could be so blind and stupid. I mean really. It's stupid, Mike.
Not just blind. Willful stupidity. Oh well. Haters gotta hate.
"it seems to believe inflicting misery is part of its directive, but, for now, it will have to limit itself to raiding dozens of other places to grab people suspected of civil violations."
So illegally being in America is in your view a "civil" violation now? Wow. That's a weasel word if I ever read one.
So, ICE is "inflicting misery" on law breakers convicted of crime?
In other words, in your opinion, if serial murderer was in a New York Court, ICE should not be able to detain him (or her. or it)?
And the reason? Because ICE should not be allowed to inflict misery on serial murderers?
Double Wow! I love your pretzel-logic.
What's next for you? Writing an opinion piece on other Kritarchy nonsense coming from judges who will rule that enforcing laws are inflicting misery on rapists, murderers, criminals who sneak into America?
Perhaps, we could change our form of government to give judges ultimate power to rule. Forget our form of government. All that counts is that criminals are helped to evade the "misery" of arrest and deportation. That is all that matters.
I am so glad you have written this article. Of course, cancel culture and censorship most certainly does not mean newsrooms now are like college campuses. I was Senior Writer for Cal State University paper The Collegian in 2012 (25 front page bylines) and I can tell you that this is nothing like a college newsroom.
More like the Stasi times or the Red Guard days. Quite like the Pol Pot days sure. But thank the Lord. Not most assuredly not like a college newsroom.
Whew! I'm so glad that the things that have been happening these past times only resemble the days of Catholic dogma in the 1400s! I'm sure when the Inquisition starts we will all be grateful that at least it's not like a college newsroom!
You have "interesting" beliefs. Like, an Englishman could know what it's like to live in a black ghetto. Or that any discussion on blacks and police would NOT have to prominently mention out of control black violent crime. Or that there is something called systemic racism without stating specifically what that is (and also including all the affirmative action programs and other givebacks to POC in your specifics).
Yep, very interesting to come to a belief system based on the above.
I wish you guys would stick to software, cable/phone monopolies, FCC, copyright and patent and leave the rest alone, because everything you write on other topics is complete fallacy.
It may be distracting for you, but it's just what was needed at this time period. It might not be legally binding, but as a general proclamation it will be influential. It's time to make social media a free speech zone. Trump has thrown down the gauntlet. That's never distracting and it's never meaningless.
This terrible news. Again, the tech monopolies have been able to squirm free of any correction and allowed their continued dominance of the Civil Commons, choking off discourse. Thanks for explaining just how sadly it went down. You read the court's ruling and you just have to say: There oughta be a law. Yep, the court is correct: the law as written now doesn't prevent tech monopoly censorship of thought and discourse, but there sure oughta be a law preventing them from this. It's a crime.
The very idea of an Oversight Board is un-American as it violates free speech. The idea of stacking the "oversight board" with "woke" social justice workers just adds insult to injury.
Facebook and all other social media should be nationalized and then categorized as public utilities. You don't have an "oversight board" at the phone company when you get phone line to your house. The same principle applies to social media which literally IS the Common Square in 2020.
If the FBI is not entrapping fake "terrorists," they are presenting faulty forensics as 100 percent accurate. They mishandled Waco, Ruby Ridge, even the Boston Bombing, tried to frame Richard Jewell, and many others lesser known. Defense Attorney Sidney Powell has just stated that Comey and his FBI never got a search warrant for Weiner's laptop that included the Hillary emails that were on it, then went before the press and lied that they found nothing in those emails, a bald-faced liem since they had no warrant to look at any of them at all. There is strong indications that the FBI believe that the ends justify almost any means. They are corrupt, inept, and useless.
So help me to understand: Some nutty professor claims that a kid is supporting sexual abuse and raw racism? And he claimed that because the kid said that a woman was "hot?" Or is it because he supported a candidate that was falsely accused of hitting on girls a few years younger than him 30 years ago? Charges never proved, of course. So Professor Magoo claims that kid supports sexual abusers. Where did he do that? And where is the "raw" racism? Is that like half-cooked racism? Or baked racism?
The kid supported neither and those claims by Professor what's his name are libel. Period. Because the kid did an interview and made a few videos that means any dope can say any lie and not be sued within an inch of his bank account?
Wow, this is THE textbook case for changing libel laws. Unbelievable. You know why? If some conservative professor called Gretta T. a retarded nutcase who has blood dripping from her fangs, you would be supporting her libel suit whole heartedly.
That is the "tell." Justice for me,but not for thee. Libel laws need to be changed by statute. This is a travesty as it stands now.
So the fired guy changed the rules about whistleblowers solely in order to give this so called whistleblower credence? All whistsleblowers have always had to have first hand knowledge but for this one guy no? And whistleblower law does not protect the anonymity of the whistleblower ever. Until this one? All of the actual previous whistleblowers have stated that this is not a real whistleblower and that he doesn't fit the previous definition of a whistleblower. And this rule change and ruling by this IG kicked off a completely bogus failed impeachment attempt that paralyzed government. And you support this guy? A guy by the way that serves strictly at the pleasure of the President. He could fire the guy if he had bad breath. But he stank far more than that. How is it you can't see that and understand that? I thought you were for Snowden, Manning, Assange. Evidently not.
So, accurate reporting is awful and dangerous now? I've seen all the Fox coverage on COVID and have utterly no idea who anyone could think there was something awful or dangerous about it. Where is this nonsense coming from?
On the other hand, I've seen awful and dangerous coverage on CNN and MSNBC where they dissed the use of Hydroxychlorquine for several weeks. Now the drug is being used by thousands of doctors and is approved for this purpose by the FDA. Fox was right. Their coverage of this drug was not awful and not dangerous.
So slanderous lying ads should not be blocked? Hmm. Ok. Why are all conservative ads being blocked as slanderous and fake? Even when they aren't? Not clear on your logic here.
It seems to be: Lie about Trump and edit video to lie. That's immoral (or whatever you are calling it this week) blocking. But then put out conservative talking points, and that should be blocked because it hits too close to home?
I guess in America Free Speech for me but not for thee is your motto.
Simple answer to how do you moderate info from government sources. You do not moderate speech in the United States in accordance with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Moderating is censorship. Censorship is un-American.
Anyone who thinks that Acosta is a journalist is clearly suffering from a Stage V case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Journalists are neutral, unbiased. Nothing about Acosta is. Journalists journalize. Acosta consistently narcicsistically makes every moment of his sorry existence about Jim Acosta.
Trump has done nothing to Jim Acosta. And just because some kritarch (judge ruler lording it over a democracy in place of people voting) has let a suit go forward? It will take months or probably years, but then will be thrown out by the Supreme Court in minutes, probably seconds.
How can you possibly write an article about Jim Acosta? Aren't you ashamed of yourself? Hey, man. What's wrong with you?
So, I caught at least 2 quotes taken totally out of context in order to pretend Trump said something that he didn't.
The latest hoax quote was Trump commenting on the Democrat's attempts to paint Trump and His Administration as not up to the task. He was not referring to the virus.
How fitting that this ad, which is part of the hoax to get Trump, uses Trump saying they are doing another of the many hoaxes is re-cut to perpetuate their hoax.
The ad is slanderous and a lie and should be taken down and the makers sued and prosecuted.
You must have one of the worst cases of TDS I did ever see, with this article touting Ted Lieu, who wants the First Amendment removed because it is a nuisance and Lev Parnas, a serial liar.
Simply incredible. We get it: you hate Nunes so any fool, charlatan, and rat gets kudos from you. Thanks for reminding me over and over again why I left the Left.
On the post: As Predicted: Parler Is Banning Users It Doesn't Like
Guidelines
Yeah,
I joined Parler and then read their Community Guidelines and went: Oy Vey. Why isn't there even one social media site that has NO Community Guidelines.. At least pretend there is Free Speech?
On the post: Just Like Every Other Platform, Parler Will Take Down Content And Face Impossible Content Moderation Choices
Strange Times
The delusion is strong in this one named Mike.
As an asshole/troll I had to join Parler. Yeah, I read their stupid Community Standards statement.
It's so sad to read a writer who thinks there is no censorship of conservatives on social media. It makes you wonder how someone could be so blind and stupid. I mean really. It's stupid, Mike.
Not just blind. Willful stupidity. Oh well. Haters gotta hate.
On the post: Federal Court Says ICE Can No Longer Enter New York Courthouses Just To Arrest Alleged Undocumented Immigrants
Huh?
"it seems to believe inflicting misery is part of its directive, but, for now, it will have to limit itself to raiding dozens of other places to grab people suspected of civil violations."
So illegally being in America is in your view a "civil" violation now? Wow. That's a weasel word if I ever read one.
So, ICE is "inflicting misery" on law breakers convicted of crime?
In other words, in your opinion, if serial murderer was in a New York Court, ICE should not be able to detain him (or her. or it)?
And the reason? Because ICE should not be allowed to inflict misery on serial murderers?
Double Wow! I love your pretzel-logic.
What's next for you? Writing an opinion piece on other Kritarchy nonsense coming from judges who will rule that enforcing laws are inflicting misery on rapists, murderers, criminals who sneak into America?
Perhaps, we could change our form of government to give judges ultimate power to rule. Forget our form of government. All that counts is that criminals are helped to evade the "misery" of arrest and deportation. That is all that matters.
On the post: No, The Resignation Of NYT Editor James Bennet Does Not Mean American Newsrooms Have 'Turned Into College Campuses'
Campuses
I am so glad you have written this article. Of course, cancel culture and censorship most certainly does not mean newsrooms now are like college campuses. I was Senior Writer for Cal State University paper The Collegian in 2012 (25 front page bylines) and I can tell you that this is nothing like a college newsroom.
More like the Stasi times or the Red Guard days. Quite like the Pol Pot days sure. But thank the Lord. Not most assuredly not like a college newsroom.
Whew! I'm so glad that the things that have been happening these past times only resemble the days of Catholic dogma in the 1400s! I'm sure when the Inquisition starts we will all be grateful that at least it's not like a college newsroom!
On the post: John Oliver Says What Needs To Be Said About Why Defunding The Police Is The Right Thing Right Now
Olver
You have "interesting" beliefs. Like, an Englishman could know what it's like to live in a black ghetto. Or that any discussion on blacks and police would NOT have to prominently mention out of control black violent crime. Or that there is something called systemic racism without stating specifically what that is (and also including all the affirmative action programs and other givebacks to POC in your specifics).
Yep, very interesting to come to a belief system based on the above.
I wish you guys would stick to software, cable/phone monopolies, FCC, copyright and patent and leave the rest alone, because everything you write on other topics is complete fallacy.
On the post: Mark Zuckerberg's Ridiculously Wrong, Misleading, And Self-Serving Statements Regarding Twitter Fact-Checking The President
Definitions
The definition of fact-checking is: Censorship.
Zuck knows this. But didn't he just create a committee of left-wing hacks to moderate Facebook?
On the post: The Two Things To Understand About Trump's Executive Order On Social Media: (1) It's A Distraction (2) It's Legally Meaningless
Distracting?
It may be distracting for you, but it's just what was needed at this time period. It might not be legally binding, but as a general proclamation it will be influential. It's time to make social media a free speech zone. Trump has thrown down the gauntlet. That's never distracting and it's never meaningless.
On the post: DC Appeals Court Dumps Lawsuit Claiming Multiple Tech Companies Are Engaged In An Anti-Conservative Conspiracy
Bad News
This terrible news. Again, the tech monopolies have been able to squirm free of any correction and allowed their continued dominance of the Civil Commons, choking off discourse. Thanks for explaining just how sadly it went down. You read the court's ruling and you just have to say: There oughta be a law. Yep, the court is correct: the law as written now doesn't prevent tech monopoly censorship of thought and discourse, but there sure oughta be a law preventing them from this. It's a crime.
On the post: So Wait, People Really Think The Barr DOJ's Investigation Into Google Is In Good Faith?
Good Fatth
So Wait, People Really Think The Barr DOJ's Investigation Into Google Is In Good Faith?
Um, Duh.
How would anyone with a pulse think that Google should continue to do their evil?
What kind of person would NOT understand that Google is a cheating, tyrannical, crazed, off the rails monopoly?
How is that not bleedin' obvious?
On the post: One Of The Few Government Officials Who Actually Can 'Police Speech' Whines Ridiculously About Facebook's Oversight Board
Oversight
The very idea of an Oversight Board is un-American as it violates free speech. The idea of stacking the "oversight board" with "woke" social justice workers just adds insult to injury.
Facebook and all other social media should be nationalized and then categorized as public utilities. You don't have an "oversight board" at the phone company when you get phone line to your house. The same principle applies to social media which literally IS the Common Square in 2020.
On the post: After 48 Years, DC Appeals Court Overturns Murder Conviction Based On FBI's Garbage 'Hair Match' Evidence
The FBI is Useless except for bad
If the FBI is not entrapping fake "terrorists," they are presenting faulty forensics as 100 percent accurate. They mishandled Waco, Ruby Ridge, even the Boston Bombing, tried to frame Richard Jewell, and many others lesser known. Defense Attorney Sidney Powell has just stated that Comey and his FBI never got a search warrant for Weiner's laptop that included the Hillary emails that were on it, then went before the press and lied that they found nothing in those emails, a bald-faced liem since they had no warrant to look at any of them at all. There is strong indications that the FBI believe that the ends justify almost any means. They are corrupt, inept, and useless.
On the post: Court Tells Pro-Trump 12-Year-Old That Calling Him A Defender Of Racism And Sexual Assault Is Protected Speech
Curiosity
So help me to understand: Some nutty professor claims that a kid is supporting sexual abuse and raw racism? And he claimed that because the kid said that a woman was "hot?" Or is it because he supported a candidate that was falsely accused of hitting on girls a few years younger than him 30 years ago? Charges never proved, of course. So Professor Magoo claims that kid supports sexual abusers. Where did he do that? And where is the "raw" racism? Is that like half-cooked racism? Or baked racism?
The kid supported neither and those claims by Professor what's his name are libel. Period. Because the kid did an interview and made a few videos that means any dope can say any lie and not be sued within an inch of his bank account?
Wow, this is THE textbook case for changing libel laws. Unbelievable. You know why? If some conservative professor called Gretta T. a retarded nutcase who has blood dripping from her fangs, you would be supporting her libel suit whole heartedly.
That is the "tell." Justice for me,but not for thee. Libel laws need to be changed by statute. This is a travesty as it stands now.
On the post: Donald Trump Fires Inspector General Who Brought Ukraine Phone Call Whistleblower Complaint To Congress
When is a Whitleblower not One
So the fired guy changed the rules about whistleblowers solely in order to give this so called whistleblower credence? All whistsleblowers have always had to have first hand knowledge but for this one guy no? And whistleblower law does not protect the anonymity of the whistleblower ever. Until this one? All of the actual previous whistleblowers have stated that this is not a real whistleblower and that he doesn't fit the previous definition of a whistleblower. And this rule change and ruling by this IG kicked off a completely bogus failed impeachment attempt that paralyzed government. And you support this guy? A guy by the way that serves strictly at the pleasure of the President. He could fire the guy if he had bad breath. But he stank far more than that. How is it you can't see that and understand that? I thought you were for Snowden, Manning, Assange. Evidently not.
On the post: SLAPP Suit Filed Against Fox News Over Awful & Dangerous COVID-19 Coverage
Awful and Dangerous?
So, accurate reporting is awful and dangerous now? I've seen all the Fox coverage on COVID and have utterly no idea who anyone could think there was something awful or dangerous about it. Where is this nonsense coming from?
On the other hand, I've seen awful and dangerous coverage on CNN and MSNBC where they dissed the use of Hydroxychlorquine for several weeks. Now the drug is being used by thousands of doctors and is approved for this purpose by the FDA. Fox was right. Their coverage of this drug was not awful and not dangerous.
On the post: Democrats Being Blocked From Advertising On Trump's Failed COVID-19 Response Due To Content Moderation Rules
Why
So slanderous lying ads should not be blocked? Hmm. Ok. Why are all conservative ads being blocked as slanderous and fake? Even when they aren't? Not clear on your logic here.
It seems to be: Lie about Trump and edit video to lie. That's immoral (or whatever you are calling it this week) blocking. But then put out conservative talking points, and that should be blocked because it hits too close to home?
I guess in America Free Speech for me but not for thee is your motto.
On the post: How Do You Moderate COVID-19 Misinformation When It's Coming From Official Sources?
Simple Answer
Simple answer to how do you moderate info from government sources. You do not moderate speech in the United States in accordance with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Moderating is censorship. Censorship is un-American.
There you go. Fixed it for ya.
On the post: Judge Allows PEN America's Lawsuit Against Donald Trump Over Retaliation Against The Media To Proceed
Acosa
Anyone who thinks that Acosta is a journalist is clearly suffering from a Stage V case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Journalists are neutral, unbiased. Nothing about Acosta is. Journalists journalize. Acosta consistently narcicsistically makes every moment of his sorry existence about Jim Acosta.
Trump has done nothing to Jim Acosta. And just because some kritarch (judge ruler lording it over a democracy in place of people voting) has let a suit go forward? It will take months or probably years, but then will be thrown out by the Supreme Court in minutes, probably seconds.
How can you possibly write an article about Jim Acosta? Aren't you ashamed of yourself? Hey, man. What's wrong with you?
Jim Acosta? Unbelievable.
On the post: President Trump Is So Upset About This Ad Showing His Failed Handling Of COVID-19 That He's Demanding It Be Taken Down
Fraud Incarnate
So, I caught at least 2 quotes taken totally out of context in order to pretend Trump said something that he didn't.
The latest hoax quote was Trump commenting on the Democrat's attempts to paint Trump and His Administration as not up to the task. He was not referring to the virus.
How fitting that this ad, which is part of the hoax to get Trump, uses Trump saying they are doing another of the many hoaxes is re-cut to perpetuate their hoax.
The ad is slanderous and a lie and should be taken down and the makers sued and prosecuted.
On the post: Body Camera Once Again Catches An NYPD Officer Planting Drugs In Someone's Car
Legalize
This story is just another great reason to legalize all drugs now. No more police corruption! There. Done!
On the post: Rep. Lieu Tells Rep. Nunes He Looks Forward To Discovery, As More Evidence Of Nunes Connections With Parnas Emerge
Ted and Lev
You must have one of the worst cases of TDS I did ever see, with this article touting Ted Lieu, who wants the First Amendment removed because it is a nuisance and Lev Parnas, a serial liar.
Simply incredible. We get it: you hate Nunes so any fool, charlatan, and rat gets kudos from you. Thanks for reminding me over and over again why I left the Left.
Next >>