I'm curious about your definition of 'honesty'. If you mean 'doesn't lie in office' then sure, Hillary has held office, Trump hasn't, so by default Trump is more 'honest'.
However, if by 'honest' you mean 'doesn't lie' then you could compare all the utternces of two approximately 70-year-olds over the last 50 years... and I suspect the answer would actually be rather different given that Trump was flagged up as lying vastly more just over the course of the campaign, let alone in his past too.
But Eldakka doesn't even need to. 'F-bomb' is a legitimate phrase in its own right, and there is no need to incldue more as they were in an earlier post.
Plus - if someone feels like self-censoring, isn't that their prerogative? Just because you may feel free to swear like a navvy doesn't mean that everyone else does... or wants to.
He's already admitted to being far-right and so he obviously lives in a post-truth, non-factual universe. And badly needs to feed his persecution complex that goes along with his general nominal cowardice.
His 'science' would be much easier to follow if it weren't full of made-up ego-boosting Santilli iso-terms. And it still seems woefully short of actual predictions.
Plus, Springer? Who the hell posts world-shattering physics/astronomy in anything of theirs?
Santilli is apparently a Santilli isoidiot who has Santilli isodisappeared up his own Santilli isoarse with his Santilli isodaft Santilli isomodifications of everyday physical terms.
I'm not sure that a child's kaleidoscope counts as a Santilli isotelescope either...
He certainly didn't sound like he was against that - just pointing out that given the differences there was no reason to refuse Adidas access to 'Adizero' - would be different if that wanted 'Add a zero'.
It's basically that 'pay to play' option that Trumpites hate in any liberal environment but love for themselves and their politicians' monopolistic benefactors.
On the post: Wall Street Is Dreaming Of Megamergers Under Trump -- Including A Verizon-Comcast Super Union
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And...
However, if by 'honest' you mean 'doesn't lie' then you could compare all the utternces of two approximately 70-year-olds over the last 50 years... and I suspect the answer would actually be rather different given that Trump was flagged up as lying vastly more just over the course of the campaign, let alone in his past too.
On the post: Wall Street Is Dreaming Of Megamergers Under Trump -- Including A Verizon-Comcast Super Union
Re: What "Consumer" REALLY means, to corporations…
On the post: Companies Keep Asking Us To Track You; We'd Rather You Be Protected From Tracking
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Plus - if someone feels like self-censoring, isn't that their prerogative? Just because you may feel free to swear like a navvy doesn't mean that everyone else does... or wants to.
On the post: Your Earbuds Can Be Made Into Microphones With Just A Bit Of Malware
Re: Re:
On the post: FBI's NIT Hit 8,000 Computers In 120 Countries... As Did The Child Porn It Was Redistributing
Re:
On the post: FBI's NIT Hit 8,000 Computers In 120 Countries... As Did The Child Porn It Was Redistributing
Re: Re:
On the post: Comcast Takes Heat For Injecting Messages Into Internet Traffic
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Junk Scientist Greets Skepticism With Legal Threats, Sues Blogger For Criticizing Him And His Work
Re:
On the post: Junk Scientist Greets Skepticism With Legal Threats, Sues Blogger For Criticizing Him And His Work
Re: Kronomex Fart corrected spelling
On the post: Junk Scientist Greets Skepticism With Legal Threats, Sues Blogger For Criticizing Him And His Work
Re: Scientist...
Plus, Springer? Who the hell posts world-shattering physics/astronomy in anything of theirs?
On the post: Junk Scientist Greets Skepticism With Legal Threats, Sues Blogger For Criticizing Him And His Work
Re:
On the post: Junk Scientist Greets Skepticism With Legal Threats, Sues Blogger For Criticizing Him And His Work
Re:
On the post: Junk Scientist Greets Skepticism With Legal Threats, Sues Blogger For Criticizing Him And His Work
Re:
I'm not sure that a child's kaleidoscope counts as a Santilli isotelescope either...
On the post: Adidas Can't Trademark 'Adizero' Because A Small Chicago Church Sold Two 'Add A Zero' Hats To Someone In Wisconsin
Re: Possible correction
On the post: Adidas Can't Trademark 'Adizero' Because A Small Chicago Church Sold Two 'Add A Zero' Hats To Someone In Wisconsin
Re: Re: No, we're not setting a standard.
On the post: AT&T Tells FCC That Giving Its Own Content An Unfair Market Advantage Is Good For Consumers
Re:
On the post: AT&T Tells FCC That Giving Its Own Content An Unfair Market Advantage Is Good For Consumers
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: State Senator Wants To Turn First Amendment Activity Into 'Economic Terrorism'
Re:
On the post: State Senator Wants To Turn First Amendment Activity Into 'Economic Terrorism'
Re:
On the post: State Senator Wants To Turn First Amendment Activity Into 'Economic Terrorism'
Re:
Next >>