Which you did yourself! You decided the idea was so original that you accused others of obviously having stolen it. Did you not see that post above suggesting you google "periodic table of -elements"? Try it. There's loads of them. You didn't bother to do any research and that led you to threaten multiple people with court action.
You're the thief here. They should be suing you for libel. Now that you're on record for having done this once, you can expect that will be people's immediate course of action in the future. Congratulations.
Still, don't beat yourself up over it. Learn from it. Some educations are more expensive than others.
Isn't she also the one known for displaying an "unacceptable" amount of cleavage on Sesame St?
Holy cow, yes!
No kidding, which I consider rather perverse. What do those complainers think mammary glands are for, other than to produce baby food? Every mammal has nipples, including males. Every child watching Sesame St. is at most only months or a few years past being intimately familiar with their mother's breasts. What more apropos audience is there than children?
You inadvertently bring up another point. Why don't we cover cow's udders if they're so dangerous? Why aren't male body builders forced to cover up? Some of them have bigger breasts than many women.
I'll be very happy to see the end of this prudish nonsense.
... and they've managed to grow up into adulthood, they're a stumbling, drunken alcoholic, and they're a gun nut. I doubt you're going to want to live there any more, but good luck finding anyone to buy your house once prospective buyers see who'll be living next door.
Then there's the option of subpoenaing third parties, like cloud storage services, to find the content that can't be accessed on the phone.
They can even get a gag order on said third parties to keep you from finding out that you're being spied upon. Feature!
I can think of one good thing wrt the DHS opening an office in CA. It could create a new enjoyable hobby for Californians. "Hey everybody, I'm going dumpster diving at the new DHS office. Anyone want to join me?"
Re: Re: Justice? No, "Just us, and our friends and cronies."
And we can return to anarchism or libertarian separatism, but it means giving up the infrastructure that gives us nice things like roads, or electrical power, or running water.
Those don't have to be provided by a gov't. Private enterprises have done all of them in the past and still could again, and likely a lot less wastefully, more efficiently, and less expensively, with far greater accountability.
If this appears to be the safest route for site owners to take, this law will result in more trafficking ads, rather than less.
And the last functioning productive business in the USA will please turn out the lights when it leaves.
If I was Lynch, I'd have payback foremost on my mind. I'd spend the next four years applying the dog's breakfast laws on the idiots in Congress who passed them. At the end of four years, they'd all be in jail for the rest of their lives, and we'd save a fortune for no longer having to suffer their existence. She could also go after the DoD and the former politicians who released the Internet on the world in the first place. How dare they?!?
Re: But Petraeus did not try to change the government
He merely breached state secrets in order to get laid and embellish his biography.
Either Broadwell is one damned fine partner in bed, or he's one seriously, pathetically inept womanizer. I'm beginning to suspect latent homosexual tendencies. How else could he have managed to drag the whole DoJ along by their noses?
Justice? No, "Just us, and our friends and cronies."
As was widely anticipated, the celebrated general received no jail time and instead got only two-years probation plus a $100,000 fine.
It must be a pretty sweet life when a $100K fine is little more inconvenience than a parking ticket. Give an hour long talk to an audience, and you're done.
"Lying to federal agents is a felony that carries a sentence of up to five years in prison. The Justice Department has used that charge against terrorists, corrupt politicians and low-level drug dealers."
I believe this's also what they hung on Martha Stewart? As for Jeffrey Sterling, come on, he's black! Of course he's going to get shafted big time! Twenty-four years!?! Holy crap! Every time I read anything about this whole preposterous situation, I struggle to recall profanities adequate for the insanity of it. The only bright spots in this are Kiriakou has finally been released, and Snowden managed to escape their clutches.
It's stories like this that prove, despite all the good they *can* do, governments are too damned dangerous to have around. Imagine a two ton cannon on wheels below deck which has broken free of its restraints, in a ship rolling with the waves. That's government, to a T.
Even better: country X is rich. corporation Y wants it. Y bribes X's politicos to pass a law "unfair" to Y. Y sues country X based upon said bought and paid for unfair law. Profit!
If corporations are sovereign nations unto themselves, they can be the subject of military action.
I'm not a violent man, but that's strangely appealing. It really speaks to me (as a libertarian). These corps are not "laissez faire" free marketers. They're looters, or "moochers", feeding off of us who're going by the golden rule and the rule of law. I'd be happy to ally myself with forces who want to fix this and eliminate their access. Thanks for this. Great food for thought. Hmm.
Okay, I waited half an hour, didn't come out of "moderation".
"This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to view it.
Moron. TD doesn't do it the way you expect web forums to work. Your post is there, and we can see it if we choose to, but no, you are not waiting for a moderator to approve your post.
I'm convinced it's a combination of nepotism and "our sort of people" crap. Nothing else seems to explain how these boneheads continue to land positions where they can exercise power over others. Cf. Bernie Madoff, and HRC, and James Comey, ...
I hear you, but that's not really accurate. Congresscritters (et al) will sell themselves for pennies on the dollar. Ie., lobbyists send a couple thousand off to bought politicos who will then write laws favorable to them worth $[mb]illions. Politicians are really cheap dates. They can't wait to rip their clothes off for us to be ravaged. I almost want to feel sorry for the bastards. You'd think they might have a better understanding of their potential worth in selling us out, but they'll take anything it appears, no matter how little is offered.
On the post: Designer Still Pursuing Bogus Takedown Of Periodic Table Of HTML Elements; Has No Idea How Copyright Works
Re: Re:
Which you did yourself! You decided the idea was so original that you accused others of obviously having stolen it. Did you not see that post above suggesting you google "periodic table of -elements"? Try it. There's loads of them. You didn't bother to do any research and that led you to threaten multiple people with court action.
You're the thief here. They should be suing you for libel. Now that you're on record for having done this once, you can expect that will be people's immediate course of action in the future. Congratulations.
Still, don't beat yourself up over it. Learn from it. Some educations are more expensive than others.
On the post: Trademark Examiner Not Swayed By Katy Perry's Attempt To Trademark The Left Shark
Re: *duckducking "seseme street cleavage"*
No kidding, which I consider rather perverse. What do those complainers think mammary glands are for, other than to produce baby food? Every mammal has nipples, including males. Every child watching Sesame St. is at most only months or a few years past being intimately familiar with their mother's breasts. What more apropos audience is there than children?
You inadvertently bring up another point. Why don't we cover cow's udders if they're so dangerous? Why aren't male body builders forced to cover up? Some of them have bigger breasts than many women.
I'll be very happy to see the end of this prudish nonsense.
On the post: Trademark Examiner Not Swayed By Katy Perry's Attempt To Trademark The Left Shark
Re: Re: Re: Left Shark isn’t really about Katy Perry.
On the post: DHS Opening Office In Silicon Valley To More Efficiently Complain To Tech Companies About Encryption
Re:
On the post: DHS Opening Office In Silicon Valley To More Efficiently Complain To Tech Companies About Encryption
There goes the neighborhood. :-P
They can even get a gag order on said third parties to keep you from finding out that you're being spied upon. Feature!
I can think of one good thing wrt the DHS opening an office in CA. It could create a new enjoyable hobby for Californians. "Hey everybody, I'm going dumpster diving at the new DHS office. Anyone want to join me?"
On the post: Compare And Contrast Prosecution And Sentences Of David Petraeus With Government Whistleblowers
Re: Re: Justice? No, "Just us, and our friends and cronies."
Those don't have to be provided by a gov't. Private enterprises have done all of them in the past and still could again, and likely a lot less wastefully, more efficiently, and less expensively, with far greater accountability.
On the post: Designer Still Pursuing Bogus Takedown Of Periodic Table Of HTML Elements; Has No Idea How Copyright Works
Re:
If anything, this proves that being butthurt and shitheaded are demonstrably not gender related conditions. We can all rejoice in that.
On the post: Designer Still Pursuing Bogus Takedown Of Periodic Table Of HTML Elements; Has No Idea How Copyright Works
Re: Re: Re: Re: Alara Mills
On the post: In Deal To Get Loretta Lynch Confirmed As Attorney General, Senate Agrees To Undermine Free Speech On The Internet
Hypocrites and liars all.
And the last functioning productive business in the USA will please turn out the lights when it leaves.
If I was Lynch, I'd have payback foremost on my mind. I'd spend the next four years applying the dog's breakfast laws on the idiots in Congress who passed them. At the end of four years, they'd all be in jail for the rest of their lives, and we'd save a fortune for no longer having to suffer their existence. She could also go after the DoD and the former politicians who released the Internet on the world in the first place. How dare they?!?
On the post: Compare And Contrast Prosecution And Sentences Of David Petraeus With Government Whistleblowers
Re: But Petraeus did not try to change the government
Either Broadwell is one damned fine partner in bed, or he's one seriously, pathetically inept womanizer. I'm beginning to suspect latent homosexual tendencies. How else could he have managed to drag the whole DoJ along by their noses?
On the post: Compare And Contrast Prosecution And Sentences Of David Petraeus With Government Whistleblowers
Re: 14th Amendment
On the post: Compare And Contrast Prosecution And Sentences Of David Petraeus With Government Whistleblowers
Justice? No, "Just us, and our friends and cronies."
It must be a pretty sweet life when a $100K fine is little more inconvenience than a parking ticket. Give an hour long talk to an audience, and you're done.
I believe this's also what they hung on Martha Stewart? As for Jeffrey Sterling, come on, he's black! Of course he's going to get shafted big time! Twenty-four years!?! Holy crap! Every time I read anything about this whole preposterous situation, I struggle to recall profanities adequate for the insanity of it. The only bright spots in this are Kiriakou has finally been released, and Snowden managed to escape their clutches.
It's stories like this that prove, despite all the good they *can* do, governments are too damned dangerous to have around. Imagine a two ton cannon on wheels below deck which has broken free of its restraints, in a ship rolling with the waves. That's government, to a T.
On the post: Corporate Sovereignty Trumps National Laws; Here's How The US Thinks It Can Get Around That
Re:
On the post: Corporate Sovereignty Trumps National Laws; Here's How The US Thinks It Can Get Around That
Re: Not just foreign companies
On the post: Corporate Sovereignty Trumps National Laws; Here's How The US Thinks It Can Get Around That
Re: Re: Not equal to, but above
I'm not a violent man, but that's strangely appealing. It really speaks to me (as a libertarian). These corps are not "laissez faire" free marketers. They're looters, or "moochers", feeding off of us who're going by the golden rule and the rule of law. I'd be happy to ally myself with forces who want to fix this and eliminate their access. Thanks for this. Great food for thought. Hmm.
On the post: Irish Legislator Proposes Law That Would Make Annoying People Online A Criminal Act
Re: "Well, no, not really"????
Moron. TD doesn't do it the way you expect web forums to work. Your post is there, and we can see it if we choose to, but no, you are not waiting for a moderator to approve your post.
Boor. Twit. Imbecile. Ultramaroon! Physician, heal thyself.
On the post: Irish Legislator Proposes Law That Would Make Annoying People Online A Criminal Act
Re:
I'm convinced it's a combination of nepotism and "our sort of people" crap. Nothing else seems to explain how these boneheads continue to land positions where they can exercise power over others. Cf. Bernie Madoff, and HRC, and James Comey, ...
On the post: If You Really Think TPP Is About 'Trade' Then Your Analysis Is Already Wrong
Re: Re: Nothing will derail her campaign
I hear you, but that's not really accurate. Congresscritters (et al) will sell themselves for pennies on the dollar. Ie., lobbyists send a couple thousand off to bought politicos who will then write laws favorable to them worth $[mb]illions. Politicians are really cheap dates. They can't wait to rip their clothes off for us to be ravaged. I almost want to feel sorry for the bastards. You'd think they might have a better understanding of their potential worth in selling us out, but they'll take anything it appears, no matter how little is offered.
On the post: Irish Legislator Proposes Law That Would Make Annoying People Online A Criminal Act
Re: Re:
On the post: Irish Legislator Proposes Law That Would Make Annoying People Online A Criminal Act
Re:
Next >>