Oh, they do state it straight out. Like when people ask for a lawyer. But sure, you don't give permission to search your car? seems suspicious. That's a reason to search your car.
Nothing. Overbroadly applying laws sideways to punish privacy invasion is, as always, doin' it rong.
This could lead to fun things like, oh, say some complete waste of skin does something like doxxing and revenge porn or what have you on thousands of people. One of those victims discovers who this is and writes something up exposing the person who is doing this, revealing things that qualify as private information. And of course they are doing this with intent to hurt the person, not merely to warn others. Guess who is now liable under the law, as it is being applied?
Oh, i don't know why the police would even complain about it. They can just do what they always do. "You have the right to x, but if you invoke that right, things are going to go way worse for you."
It's funny how it follows the same pattern as physical items with design, materials, or construction flaws. Companies don't like those investigated either. Only in the digital space, they have all these extra ways to stifle research or the researchers.
After i saw this yesterday, i did a quick search for giggles. Straight off i found a book that gives a photo attribution to Carol M. Highsmith/Buyenlarge/Getty. TIME Inside the White House- The History, Secrets and Style of the World's Most Famous Home
I think the problem is that shit keeps getting crazier and more extreme, and it is just accepted as the new normal. I would hate to keep running this experiment of "let's see who (or what policies) is so over the top that we as a nation "wake up". And I am not sure who it is in Congress who would get this wakeup call. Most just punch their time cards, or they have already been as extreme as Trump for ages. Any serious departure from this trend is what is seen as radical. The "compromise center" has shifted way too far into bizarroland already.
We don't "special insight". We only need the long, long record on who has been pro-TPP. (And other, similar gems. And pro-fast track, and pro-secrecy, and completely misrepresenting what are in these "trade" deals...)
The article wasn't about Trump. He was mentioned not even by name as sort of a comparative foil.
No one ignored here ignored the "DNC hack". Maybe you ignored everything except this particular article. Which apparently shouldn't exist, or be entirely uncritical of Clinton. This article is about it's subject. It's not a politically-motivated list of reasons to be anti-Clinton.
The facts suck, I know. But some of you Clinton supporters should check yourselves, you aren't doing her any favors. (Not that every dog that's been in this fight hasn't had some truly awful supporters.)
Mostly the culture of not being able to get away with ultra-cheap development and production needs to be changed. If everyone is playing on the same field, the forces of innovation will roll right on ahead. If they can't, their service is probably so shoddy, pointless, and possibly dangerous that it really is better if it doesn't make it to market. Businesses get away with externalizing far too many costs. It's just not their problem, whether it's awful IoT-ness, leaded gasoline, asbestos, pollution and environmental destruction, using limited resources for discardable items, or hiding from taxes that would pay to upkeep the infrastructure that allows them to do what they do in the first place. Sure, it can suck trying to fight the incumbent system as a startup, but that's why there should be incentives to small businesses rather than giant breaks for megacorporations. But if all you are going to do is start up and then sell out, well, you're kind of part of the problem.
Overly onerous, pointless, and ridiculous rules are always stupid. I think most people would like to avoid those. Which is why we should stop legislating and acting on belief, and be a bit more evidence-based culturally.
On the post: NYPD Dodges Another Legislative Attempt To Inject Accountability And Transparency Into Its Daily Work
Re: Re:
On the post: The Selfie-Taking Monkey Who Has No Idea He Has Lawyers Has Appealed His Copyright Lawsuit
Re: umad?
On the post: Irony: Sony Pictures Sued For Failing To Stop Piracy
Re:
On the post: How California's Identity Fraud Law Has Been Interpreted To Criminalize Defamation, Publicity Rights Violations And More
Re:
On the post: How California's Identity Fraud Law Has Been Interpreted To Criminalize Defamation, Publicity Rights Violations And More
Re:
This could lead to fun things like, oh, say some complete waste of skin does something like doxxing and revenge porn or what have you on thousands of people. One of those victims discovers who this is and writes something up exposing the person who is doing this, revealing things that qualify as private information. And of course they are doing this with intent to hurt the person, not merely to warn others. Guess who is now liable under the law, as it is being applied?
On the post: How California's Identity Fraud Law Has Been Interpreted To Criminalize Defamation, Publicity Rights Violations And More
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: NYPD Dodges Another Legislative Attempt To Inject Accountability And Transparency Into Its Daily Work
On the post: The Selfie-Taking Monkey Who Has No Idea He Has Lawyers Has Appealed His Copyright Lawsuit
Re: Re:
On the post: Security Researchers Sued For Exposing Internet Filtering Company's Sale Of Censorship Software To Blacklisted Country
Re: Re:
On the post: Security Researchers Sued For Exposing Internet Filtering Company's Sale Of Censorship Software To Blacklisted Country
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The Selfie-Taking Monkey Who Has No Idea He Has Lawyers Has Appealed His Copyright Lawsuit
On the post: Photographer Sues Getty Images For $1 Billion For Claiming Copyright On Photos She Donated To The Public
Re:
On the post: Photographer Sues Getty Images For $1 Billion For Claiming Copyright On Photos She Donated To The Public
Re: A new business model?
On the post: Photographer Sues Getty Images For $1 Billion For Claiming Copyright On Photos She Donated To The Public
TIME Inside the White House- The History, Secrets and Style of the World's Most Famous Home
You can find it in Google Books. The credits page is at the back, the image is at the beginning of the introduction.
https://books.google.com/books?id=ragDDAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q& amp;f=false
On the post: After Ripping Off Cities, States For Years, Verizon Makes Some Familiar Broadband Promises To Boston
Re: new provider in town
On the post: 'Wish I Had The Power' To Hack Enemies' Emails, Says Man Very Close To Having Such Power
Re:
On the post: 'Wish I Had The Power' To Hack Enemies' Emails, Says Man Very Close To Having Such Power
Re: Re: Re: Maybe this is what we need...
On the post: Clinton Friend Admits What Everyone Knows Is True: Clinton Still Supports TPP & Will Back It
Re: Nice journalism Techdirt
The article wasn't about Trump. He was mentioned not even by name as sort of a comparative foil.
No one ignored here ignored the "DNC hack". Maybe you ignored everything except this particular article. Which apparently shouldn't exist, or be entirely uncritical of Clinton. This article is about it's subject. It's not a politically-motivated list of reasons to be anti-Clinton.
The facts suck, I know. But some of you Clinton supporters should check yourselves, you aren't doing her any favors. (Not that every dog that's been in this fight hasn't had some truly awful supporters.)
On the post: Clinton Friend Admits What Everyone Knows Is True: Clinton Still Supports TPP & Will Back It
On the post: The Internet Of Things Is a Security And Privacy Dumpster Fire And The Check Is About To Come Due
Re: Re: Easy fix
Overly onerous, pointless, and ridiculous rules are always stupid. I think most people would like to avoid those. Which is why we should stop legislating and acting on belief, and be a bit more evidence-based culturally.
Next >>