So.. why should anyone believe this police detective anymore when he gets up on the stand to testify? If he was busted for lying and taking a bribe then how do we know he won't do it again in the future? Is it any wonder few people trust the police any more?
So, if CSLI is now protected factual data points, then why isn't call metadata (number called, date, and time)? Both are factual data points. Both will, when looked at over an extended period of time, reveal many interesting bits of information about a person. Both are collected by the telco for their routine business and yet only one is protected by warrant requirements? This (seemingly to me double standard) doesn't make much sense.
Sounds like some people are practicing medicine without a license to me. Given that some of the people subjected to this needed life saving measures I think that would count as severe bodily harm and would escalate it from a misdemeanor to a felony.
Holy crap, I would love to hear the actual audio on that part... and a camera on the attorney cause he had to have been sweating bullets after that exchange.
The only problem is, the Chief of Police is a public persona and the bar for defamation is a lot higher then the one for your average person on the street.
So if the primary motivation of someone is based on the media they (over) consume, ie: violent video games and movies leads to more violence, then shouldn't we be having an outbreak of mass non consensual sex related crimes because of all that easily available porn?
I bet they even made her pay for all the medical tests, just to add insult to injury for making them go through all that work looking for something that wasn't there to begin with.
That would result in 'spoliation of evidence' and the courts have almost always held that harshly against whoever did the spoiling. Also might not actually be all the effective cause even though the drive is encrypted they can still make a copy of it, so just cause you nuked that copy doesn't mean they don't have another.
Well, consider the audience that this guy was speaking too. If it was filled with industry execs (and possibly the big telecom execs) then what he said was the truth. The Obama FCC did in fact pass rules and regulations that took away the free and open (cash pipe) internet that they wanted. Then Trump and Pai come along and repeal the rules and gave it back to them.
So, the FCC is likely going to get their way and change the rules. They are being very stubborn and covering their ears to what they people they are supposed to be protecting are saying.
What recourse do we have after the vote takes place? Lawsuits? Senate override? Legislative action?
So.. unless CPB is willing to take this to court, I don't see how they can invoke the Deliberative Process Privilege. They don't get to unilaterally make the decision to withhold something, they need the authority of the courts to do that.
For everyone insisting that Twitter should have a dual control for deleting or turning off an account, I suspect they had that at one point. However because everyone was yelling at them to be more proactive about taking down 'terrorist accounts' or 'think of the children' type issues they removed it.
On the post: Judge Shrugs At 1st Amendment, Orders News Site To Take Down Info It Got From A Publicly-Available Court Filing [UPDATED]
On the post: Post-Carpenter Ruling Says Call Records Aren't Content Or Cell Site Location Info; Thus, No 4th Amendment Protection
On the post: Cops Are Telling Paramedics To Inject Arrestees With Ketamine. Worse, EMS Crews Are Actually Doing It.
On the post: Minnesota's Vague Ban On 'Political' Wear At Polling Places Shut Down By The Supreme Court
On the post: Judge Cock(y)blocks Author Faleena Hopkins' Demand Other Authors Stop Using The Word 'Cocky' In Their Titles
On the post: Police Chief Sends Officers Out To Arrest Man For Calling The Chief A 'Dirty' Cop
Re: Re: Don't want to Shupe with him
On the post: Congresswoman Says School Shootings Are Caused By Porn, Mental Illness, Single Parents... But Mostly Porn
On the post: Court Has No Problem With Multiple Invasive Probings In Search Of Drugs That Didn't Exist
On the post: Former Judge Accuses Russia's IP Court Of Using Unlicensed Software
On the post: Another Federal Court Says Compelled Decryption Doesn't Raise Fifth Amendment Issues
Re:
On the post: The US Government Is Considering Drafting Middle-Aged Hackers To Fight The Cyberwar
Next up!
*Thank you Mr. Robert Heinlien.
On the post: NRA Gives FCC Boss An Award For 'Courageously' Killing Net Neutrality, May Have Violated Ethics Rules
Check the audience
On the post: Washington State AG Sues Motel 6 For Handing Over Guest Registry Info To ICE
On the post: The Folks That Built The Internet Tell The FCC It Has No Idea How The Internet Works
What recourse do we have after the vote takes place? Lawsuits? Senate override? Legislative action?
On the post: Australian State Wants To Let Tech Companies Ignore Laws And Regulations
On the post: DHS Trying To Bury Report Showing Violations Of Travel Ban Court Orders By CBP Officers
On the post: Don't Cheer For The Twitter Employee Who Deleted Donald Trump's Account
On the post: BlackBerry CEO Promises To Try To Break Customers' Encryption If The US Gov't Asks Him To
Re:
On the post: UK Gov't Considering Redefining Social Media Services As Publishers To Make It Easier To Control Them
On the post: GCHQ Knew FBI Wanted To Arrest MalwareTech, Let Him Fly To The US To Be Arrested There
Re: Re: Re:
Next >>