Re: Re: Re: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship-WRONG,WRO
Real American, my ass. And still too much of a coward to own up to it. And no, I don't need to have been there to see what you assclowns did, neither does the world you've all impressed so deeply.
Listing Biden's failures would be hundreds of pages long yet
delirious idiots like you still voted for him because "Trump a bad
man anything is better."
Yup, I'm with Sam Harris on this one:
"I’ll tell you how bad I think this is: if you gave me a choice to randomly pick an American citizen, or take Trump, I would roll the dice with a random citizen. I mean, you realize how bad that could turn out? You realize how many people in this country shouldn’t be president? I would go for door #2, ok, because at a minimum, I would expect a randomly chosen unqualified citizen to be so terrified and awed by the responsibility being thrust upon his or her shoulders that they would be desperate to defer to real experts. Trump has the opposite attitude. His lack of qualification is married to an egocentrism the likes of which we have never seen! So no, the health issue is a non-issue for me. As long as she doesn’t show up at a rally and kill and eat a baby, she’s got my vote."
You voted for some dumbass that can't even remember his own
wife or his sister yet you think he can run a country?
It's funny that asshats like you are apparently too stupid to realize that EVERYTHING you blame Biden for has been done by Drumpf at least in triplicate. Way to show your superior intellect, dude.
one that does not suffer from such fatal deficiencies as the
current one that ended up handing probably the worst candidate
in American history the victory, by allowing millions of fraudulent
votes to be counted.
Would that be those darn mail-in ballots that you do not hear a peep about from the GOPtards where they helped Trump win a state? Funny that.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Re: Re: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship-WRONG,WRO
Real American, my ass. And still too much of a coward to own up to it. And no, I don't need to have been there to see what you assclowns did, neither does the world you've all impressed so deeply.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship-WRONG,WRONG, & WR
You fucking cowards aren't even man enough to own up to the fact it was loonies from your side who did this. Sad.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re:
Mmh, your tears are delicious, asshat.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re:
Why? Did he collude with Russia?
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Tech circle
Which is why he did not go along with the crowd as he said he would?
Because they listened to the 'stop the count' idiots?
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re:
Like Parler should not be able to ban me for making fun of drumpfist morons, right?
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Re:
And nothing of value will be lost. But wait, are you seeing the TV networks won't report on him anymore? Really?
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re:
Let's see how this plays out then.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re:
You mean, back in his birther days?
On the post: Politics Is Not A Game
Re: Unhappy?
Yeah, go on respecting the whiner-in-chief who boldly stormed ahead of his moronic troops as promised. Oh wait...
On the post: Parler, Desperate For Attention, Pretends It Doesn't Need Section 230
Re: This is all Twitter/Facebook/Google's fault
And still the morons on the right beat the liberals at being crazy easily. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes!
Just let that sink in.
On the post: Parler, Desperate For Attention, Pretends It Doesn't Need Section 230
Wonder why that is, huh?
On the post: Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks
Re: Re:
Yup, I'm with Sam Harris on this one:
"I’ll tell you how bad I think this is: if you gave me a choice to randomly pick an American citizen, or take Trump, I would roll the dice with a random citizen. I mean, you realize how bad that could turn out? You realize how many people in this country shouldn’t be president? I would go for door #2, ok, because at a minimum, I would expect a randomly chosen unqualified citizen to be so terrified and awed by the responsibility being thrust upon his or her shoulders that they would be desperate to defer to real experts. Trump has the opposite attitude. His lack of qualification is married to an egocentrism the likes of which we have never seen! So no, the health issue is a non-issue for me. As long as she doesn’t show up at a rally and kill and eat a baby, she’s got my vote."
On the post: Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reopen the economy
Nope. Cause fake news is anything true which is why it's pissing off Drumpf who can't handle reality.
On the post: Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's funny that asshats like you are apparently too stupid to realize that EVERYTHING you blame Biden for has been done by Drumpf at least in triplicate. Way to show your superior intellect, dude.
On the post: Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks
Re: Re: Re: Reopen the economy
Yeah, right.
On the post: Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Tough shit for you assclowns that reality has a well-known liberal bias, huh?
On the post: Lindsey Graham's Latest Attack On Section 230: Reform It By 2023, Or We Take It Away
Re: Re: No, only HOSTS are immunized. Publishers are still liabl
Said the clueless asshat totally oblvious to the point he was actually making.
On the post: Trump Appoints Unqualified Guy Who Hates Section 230 To Top Justice Department Role
Re: Re:
Would that be those darn mail-in ballots that you do not hear a peep about from the GOPtards where they helped Trump win a state? Funny that.
On the post: As A Parting Shot, Tulsi Gabbard Teams Up With Paul Gosar To Introduce Yet Another Unconstitutional Attack On Section 230
Re: Re: You'd have beeter luck explaining anything to a wall
It's idiot discrimination, asshat.
Next >>