HOw many reasons do we want??
"The city agreed taxpayers should give Bryan Carmody $369,000"
For every police shooting,
Car stop,
Any interaction with the public, we want Justification, we want to KNOW you did the right thing, and the proper way.
The people are TIRED of paying off for your LEGAL EXPENSES.
These people have Contracts, that EVERY UNION would love to have. And they dont even need to Bury the body AFTER.
Lets see..
City installs cameras.
City lets them be Public accessed..
Record and send in the vid of the crime.
If everyone is held responsible..
Cops, you, me, the rich, the corps..
Could be an interesting thing.
But with everyone sharing the info and taking advantage of this. Isnt that a type of socialism??
At least it would be better then CSPAN.
Why is it Im TOLD the law, but never get to read the book(s)..
Convoluted piles of monkey poo??
Stuff that hasnt changed in 100+ years and is obsolete?
Changes that Favor certain groups over others??
That to protest and get attention, you Make things happen. And people get upset, and the NEWS pays attention.
To get a customer to BUY your product they make promises that they cant do. And then SCREW the consumer. All the way to installing Fake bills that are over estomated After you signed a contract at $19.99 per month, and in 90 days goes to $50-80, and Then add's EXTRA fee's that not even the Gov. can figure out.
Our gov., Teddy Roosevelt, install a Phone tax in 1899(?) to pay for the Spanish American war, Which if you think about it was for the rich and the Corps that had phones at that time. Was, about 10 years ago, resended/dropped. But we have to understand something, Where was that $5 fee going? as the gov., had forgotten about it. And soon after, the Phone corps added another fee on top. And if you Complained about that $5, you could Only get back 2 years worth of it, out of 100+ years.
This needs fixing.
"Friedman introduced the theory in a 1970 essay for The New York Times titled "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits". In it, he argued that a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders."
That is capitalism.
Stocks WERE supposed to be for Short term use. Not forever, Not as a Long term Cheap interest Loan, and NOT to corps that took advantage of LLC.
https://www.upcounsel.com/top-llc-companies
"These are America's largest private companies, and in 2017, they made a combined revenue of $1.57 trillion and employed 4.7 million people."
Thats 200 Firms that employ <2% of our nation.
Stocks are supposed to be based on the Value of a corp. The Exaggerated value, is over 100 times the amount of money in the world. How? Who let this happen?
Why is this a problem? Because they are basing these numbers On the Public. NOT the corps that are creating the problems. Over inflating the economy for top wages, not even to pay off stock holders, is abit OFF, even for capitalism.
I wonder why they dont consider Stocks as a DEBT. It seems they are considering it a Positive or Write off.
AS AN LLC...they can.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/llc.asp#:~:text=A%20limited%20liability%20company%20(LLC)% 20is%20a%20business%20structure%20in,a%20partnership%20or%20sole%20proprietorship.
"A limited liability company (LLC) is a business structure in the United States whereby the owners are not personally liable for the company's debts or liabilities. Limited liability companies are hybrid entities that combine the characteristics of a corporation with those of a partnership or sole proprietorship."
Good luck and I know it gets convoluted, it was designed that way. Also if you can figure out How they get paid, without showing they are Paid by the LLC, you will figure out Mr. Trump.
Its easy.
or create a secondary server to verify the connection tot he Correct person/company.. 1 that IF hacked, it would lead nowhere or into a honey pot.. Kinda simple really.
Never a direct connections to the Main, until verified.
Then monitor what is done by that person and PRINT IT OUT..
And if they Hang around for a long period, THE sysop should verify them AGAIN..
No reason Sony should loose 18 terabytes of data, because of HACKER.
Get the idea, that someone Thinks they have little control of things, and wants it back?
Understanding that the Internet is about the biggest/easiest way to see/hear/express opinions and what people want to know in a democracy.
But we arnt a democracy.
Anyone remember those sites that started up with the idea of Creating bills and petitions to send to congress??
FAIL all to hell.
Why? because everyone wanted THEIR own opinion and the way they expressed it. A site with 2 million subscribers, and 2 million suggested petitions. and reading thru them was a MESS from hell.
If anyone went into it and Cleaned/joined/combined ANY of it, it would become a pissing match of Who is right and who is wrong. And whose opinion would do anything.
It was Hilarious.
The Worst part is those on the hill think they are better at it then we are.
We created the best progs to get into anything, why secure our own systems, if it wont help.
designing security to defend against Ourselves, means someone will find a way to defeat our progs.
Protecting our systems from our progs, means Someone will figure out how we did it and protect themselves.
Since the USA has privacy laws, that we cant go against, WHO can we give these to? Who can sit outside the USA and do the things WE WANT TO DO.
Age old problem. 1/2 hardware problem, and 1/2 software. Which is easiest to break into. Such as using a Flash drive to boot a system and NOT let the Hard drive boot. So that you can scan and fix a failure or Scan everything on that drive. Linux has been ahead on allot of things because everyone can Improve the software and make things better and better, in steps, where MS thinks everyone is abit stupid and cant tell the difference.
Hardware can only do what its programmed to do. And if you confuse it or use it Against the system the system has to Stop. If long ago, a certain little thing was added tot he Hardware, it would not be easy to find. All it would take is a Exit from the programming on the chip that would LET an invading software Control what was to be done, rather then let the internal hardware do it.(abit simplified) Insted of failing a Check on commands send and Stopping processing, that it would Exit and give control to the software trying to be used. Shouldnt be to hard. Esp when Most CPU's now have integrated most of the Hardware controls. The Chips are almost fully 'All in one' devices. There are so many protocols in-bedded in them, that taking advantage of the confusion in the chip Can be fairly easy, as the chip has to figure out what you want, and decides Wrongly/rightly.
I love the idea that Someone or some group thinks they are the only ones to be able to do something. And then you look at the net and all the Software that can DO the same thing, and its Free or cheaper.
I can wonder the little town I live in, in Idaho..
And find over 1/2 the people who agree with most of what I say/suggest..
ANd STILL the election is over 50% leaning the other way.
This has happened all my life, watching this and persons get tired that they find everyone around them Seem to have voted the same, but the coin flipped the other way.
(Dirty trick #1. Many states passed a law that an election can be legal even less than 50% voted.)
lets ask a really big question..
If we remove 230, and NOT replace it with something..
HOW bad will it get?
Its not that everything is reversed..
Its not that there is nothing else that can and IS done.
Its that NO ONE will have recourse.. There would be no laws Fore/against what would happen, and Who would be responsible.
LEts drop all the internet bills and laws.
Let it go wild.
Have fun Mr. trump.
You think that politicians acting like 2 year olds trying to figure out launch, is fun..
Lets add the WHOLE school into this, and Then shoot the teachers.
Who remembers SOME of hte contracts of the past...Esp int he age of the 78'
The Artist SOLD everything to the production company. ALL of it. Gained nothing. And generally, NOT even paid that much for it.
Until the artists got together, and another group decided to take charge.. It then got almost worse. The production corps Had all the power Still. And then the artists made a few unions, and got legal backing, AND EVEN in the 70's Artists were still being Screwed. Until they got Enough power to control PART of the songs, music, art.. And Finally got a Small share of the sales. Most ly because the Production companies Held contracts that only let THEM sell the music to Each of the locations.. No one could have any other agencies music, and nothing independent.
And when the Artists die...Who gets the money.. There has been a debate about this, and when the contracts END. And what the artist signed.
For a nation dedicated tot he propaganda of being the #1 in everything.
Food
Cellphone
Cable TV
MEDICAL
Export of food stocks
PRICES..
Capitalism and competition..
WE stopped competing long ago.
When for some strange reasoning, we had to pay for the best of this and that, but mostly for our Owner/Boss/CEO then we did for anything else.
Its a strange thing to push an economy UP, when there is little reason to do such a thing. The Gov. back in the old days tended to want Employment over wages. Even with abit of unemployment, it was Kinda balanced. And that Most corps that did Good, Spread the wealth around to many employees, NOT just the top boss's and CEO.
Whats entertaining most of this, is HOW many of the corps in the past failed. Or there idea of making money with USA employee and USA materials went By-by, and they Moved out of the USA to locations with less Environmental protection, lower material costs, and Employee's with NO RIGHTS.
The ones that HAD to stay, and take over became fewer, but the restrictions changed to bring others back, but WHO is getting the high wages? Who is paying for the Material costs?
There arnt many Metals made in the USA now. They are for specific companies, and a good share of them are exported. So we are left with plastics and Trying to make them NOT pollute. But we have most of that from imports from countries that have not figured out WHY we dont use it.
What is our problem?
To many. To many of the Corps from the bottom tot he top have Cut employee due to a few things, Most of which is modernization. You dont need 10,000 people to dig the Materials out anymore. But the prices never went down. The Gov has done the same things, Cut corners, Cut personnel, and give the corps/rich money. Dont balance anything from the lower paid to the top paid.
Something Iv mentioned to friends int he past. There are many ways to wage war. You dont need tanks and guns and bombs. If you can control the food(we export over 60%), control an economy(love that stock market and its change on WHEN a corp needs to buy back all those stocks)(est Forced evaluation of USA corps is over 100 times the amount of money in the world, how can they do that?)
Stupidity(not teaching people Enough to know they CAN do something about it)
Even police(not knowing the laws and Who pays their wages)
Then to Politics, and the same comment as the police(who pays your wages) And that the People dont get to evaluate what you have done, and base your WAGE on your states Support.
Slowing taking the Control away from the people, and placing it in the hands of those who have the money, in 1 form or another is Fascism..
Capitalism is abit Ruptured, and many of its lies are abounding. They dont like to compete. It loves to ravage other nations. It takes advantage of everything it can.
That Going to court COSTS MONEY..
A regular person can not goto court based on his own education and get much of anything done.
Part of the system has gotten abit Stupid, in that Everything must cost money.
Then there is the idea of fighting the state, and Almost every Judge Must be on the states Side, not unbiased. There have been tons of people that have gone to state courts, to be denied, and then Above that or on Appeal they Finally get the proper Judgements. Or even the reverse, as a corp goes up the ladder, after the state decides against them, and gets a Judgement reversed.
There are parts in this that Could stop some of this, but for some odd reasoning, it costs MORE to pursue, then to just take it in the shorts. The idea of the loser paying the winners fee's. Esp when its the consumer getting it in the shorts. OR at the very least that the Citizen, winner can then fight back to get things straightened out, FULLY.. Not a slap on the wrist for the corps we are fighting.
There are Some laws about False accusations, for the corps, but when it comes down to the citizens we have little to no recourse, that wouldnt cost us MORE or would take so much time out of our lives to process, the Monetary damages wouldnt even cover the time we have taken nor the legal representation, we NOW pay for.
On the post: So Much For Going Dark: FBI Using Social Media, E-Commerce Sites To Track Down Suspects (Including Non-Lawbreakers)
WOW...
So all the politics of this problem are Mute.
I wonder if they will get the HINT with FOSTA.
YOU want people to feel SAFE/COMFORTABLE enough to be idiot enough to have pictures taken of everything, and for most eveyrthing they Say, to be read.
Even in the event 1 person mentions 1 thing about a situation, makes it easier to Figure out and track those in the group.
Anyone reminded of the Loud mouth drunk, opening up and saying what he did..
On the post: Police Memo Says Officers Raiding A Journalist's Home Were Instructed To Turn Off Their Body Cameras
Re: I wonder WHY we placed cameras on police.
AND then you wonder Why Some persons Want a 2nd password program that can REALLY mess up a computer.
On the post: Police Memo Says Officers Raiding A Journalist's Home Were Instructed To Turn Off Their Body Cameras
I wonder WHY we placed cameras on police.
HOw many reasons do we want??
"The city agreed taxpayers should give Bryan Carmody $369,000"
For every police shooting,
Car stop,
Any interaction with the public, we want Justification, we want to KNOW you did the right thing, and the proper way.
The people are TIRED of paying off for your LEGAL EXPENSES.
These people have Contracts, that EVERY UNION would love to have. And they dont even need to Bury the body AFTER.
On the post: New York City Residents Turn City's Traffic Cameras Into Cop-Watching Tools
Re: Re: More entertainment..
Whats more interesting tends to be the act of using the LAW against them. But they are creating it as they go to cover up themselves.
On the post: New York City Residents Turn City's Traffic Cameras Into Cop-Watching Tools
More entertainment..
Lets see..
City installs cameras.
City lets them be Public accessed..
Record and send in the vid of the crime.
If everyone is held responsible..
Cops, you, me, the rich, the corps..
Could be an interesting thing.
But with everyone sharing the info and taking advantage of this. Isnt that a type of socialism??
At least it would be better then CSPAN.
On the post: FCC's O'Rielly Musters A Tiny Bit Of Courage To Almost Acknowledge Trump's Executive Order Is Unenforceable Gibberish
Please...
Can I move to China before this happens??
At least you know where you stand, and how things are done.
On the post: Copyright Gets In The Way Of Chef Andres' 'Recipes For The People'; Because The DMCA Takedown System Is Still Broken
Re: Cant wait.
Why is it Im TOLD the law, but never get to read the book(s)..
Convoluted piles of monkey poo??
Stuff that hasnt changed in 100+ years and is obsolete?
Changes that Favor certain groups over others??
On the post: Copyright Gets In The Way Of Chef Andres' 'Recipes For The People'; Because The DMCA Takedown System Is Still Broken
Cant wait.
That a person say ".....,...,m.........."
Anything, that can be quoted back to another source, even a song or movie..
And you will get a DMCA.
We already have STATES declaring that the Laws are Copy written..
"If you want a copy that will be $5 per page, with a Min 20 pages."
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse..."
Then you pay the $5 per page not me....At least give me a copy so I know what Im screwing up.
On the post: AT&T Says Being Misleading About 'Unlimited' Data Plans Was Ok, Because Reporters Told Consumers It Was Being Misleading
Isnt it wonderful
That to protest and get attention, you Make things happen. And people get upset, and the NEWS pays attention.
To get a customer to BUY your product they make promises that they cant do. And then SCREW the consumer. All the way to installing Fake bills that are over estomated After you signed a contract at $19.99 per month, and in 90 days goes to $50-80, and Then add's EXTRA fee's that not even the Gov. can figure out.
Our gov., Teddy Roosevelt, install a Phone tax in 1899(?) to pay for the Spanish American war, Which if you think about it was for the rich and the Corps that had phones at that time. Was, about 10 years ago, resended/dropped. But we have to understand something, Where was that $5 fee going? as the gov., had forgotten about it. And soon after, the Phone corps added another fee on top. And if you Complained about that $5, you could Only get back 2 years worth of it, out of 100+ years.
This needs fixing.
"Friedman introduced the theory in a 1970 essay for The New York Times titled "The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits". In it, he argued that a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders."
That is capitalism.
Stocks WERE supposed to be for Short term use. Not forever, Not as a Long term Cheap interest Loan, and NOT to corps that took advantage of LLC.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/08/milton-friedman-shareholder-wrong/596545/
&qu ot;The famed economist’s “shareholder theory” provides corporations with too much room to violate consumers’ rights and trust."
we have taken the controls away.
https://www.upcounsel.com/top-llc-companies
"These are America's largest private companies, and in 2017, they made a combined revenue of $1.57 trillion and employed 4.7 million people."
Thats 200 Firms that employ <2% of our nation.
Stocks are supposed to be based on the Value of a corp. The Exaggerated value, is over 100 times the amount of money in the world. How? Who let this happen?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_position_of_the_United_States
This is kinda scary.
"The U.S. increased the ratio of public and private debt from 152% GDP in 1980 to peak at 296% GDP in 2008, before falling to 279% GDP by Q2 2011. "
Why is this a problem? Because they are basing these numbers On the Public. NOT the corps that are creating the problems. Over inflating the economy for top wages, not even to pay off stock holders, is abit OFF, even for capitalism.
I wonder why they dont consider Stocks as a DEBT. It seems they are considering it a Positive or Write off.
AS AN LLC...they can.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/llc.asp#:~:text=A%20limited%20liability%20company%20(LLC)% 20is%20a%20business%20structure%20in,a%20partnership%20or%20sole%20proprietorship.
"A limited liability company (LLC) is a business structure in the United States whereby the owners are not personally liable for the company's debts or liabilities. Limited liability companies are hybrid entities that combine the characteristics of a corporation with those of a partnership or sole proprietorship."
Good luck and I know it gets convoluted, it was designed that way. Also if you can figure out How they get paid, without showing they are Paid by the LLC, you will figure out Mr. Trump.
Its easy.
On the post: Report Says CIA's Hacking Unit -- Home To The Vault 7 Exploits -- Deployed Almost No Internal Security Measures
Re:
or create a secondary server to verify the connection tot he Correct person/company.. 1 that IF hacked, it would lead nowhere or into a honey pot.. Kinda simple really.
Never a direct connections to the Main, until verified.
Then monitor what is done by that person and PRINT IT OUT..
And if they Hang around for a long period, THE sysop should verify them AGAIN..
No reason Sony should loose 18 terabytes of data, because of HACKER.
On the post: Senator Thom Tillis Seems Really Pissed Off That The Internet Archive Bought A Record Store To Make Rare Recordings Accessible
Re: The real problem with digitizing this stuff...
really?
really, really?
And I thought I was obnoxious.
Love the arena of NON-verification..
On the post: Senator Hawley's Section 230 Reform Even Dumber Than We Expected; Would Launch A Ton Of Vexatious Lawsuits
Anyone..
Get the idea, that someone Thinks they have little control of things, and wants it back?
Understanding that the Internet is about the biggest/easiest way to see/hear/express opinions and what people want to know in a democracy.
But we arnt a democracy.
Anyone remember those sites that started up with the idea of Creating bills and petitions to send to congress??
FAIL all to hell.
Why? because everyone wanted THEIR own opinion and the way they expressed it. A site with 2 million subscribers, and 2 million suggested petitions. and reading thru them was a MESS from hell.
If anyone went into it and Cleaned/joined/combined ANY of it, it would become a pissing match of Who is right and who is wrong. And whose opinion would do anything.
It was Hilarious.
The Worst part is those on the hill think they are better at it then we are.
On the post: Report Says CIA's Hacking Unit -- Home To The Vault 7 Exploits -- Deployed Almost No Internal Security Measures
Bad concept.
We created the best progs to get into anything, why secure our own systems, if it wont help.
designing security to defend against Ourselves, means someone will find a way to defeat our progs.
Protecting our systems from our progs, means Someone will figure out how we did it and protect themselves.
Since the USA has privacy laws, that we cant go against, WHO can we give these to? Who can sit outside the USA and do the things WE WANT TO DO.
Age old problem. 1/2 hardware problem, and 1/2 software. Which is easiest to break into. Such as using a Flash drive to boot a system and NOT let the Hard drive boot. So that you can scan and fix a failure or Scan everything on that drive. Linux has been ahead on allot of things because everyone can Improve the software and make things better and better, in steps, where MS thinks everyone is abit stupid and cant tell the difference.
Hardware can only do what its programmed to do. And if you confuse it or use it Against the system the system has to Stop. If long ago, a certain little thing was added tot he Hardware, it would not be easy to find. All it would take is a Exit from the programming on the chip that would LET an invading software Control what was to be done, rather then let the internal hardware do it.(abit simplified) Insted of failing a Check on commands send and Stopping processing, that it would Exit and give control to the software trying to be used. Shouldnt be to hard. Esp when Most CPU's now have integrated most of the Hardware controls. The Chips are almost fully 'All in one' devices. There are so many protocols in-bedded in them, that taking advantage of the confusion in the chip Can be fairly easy, as the chip has to figure out what you want, and decides Wrongly/rightly.
I love the idea that Someone or some group thinks they are the only ones to be able to do something. And then you look at the net and all the Software that can DO the same thing, and its Free or cheaper.
On the post: Senator Hawley's Latest Dumb Anti-230 Plan Would Wipe Out The President's Advantage On Facebook
Re:
I can wonder the little town I live in, in Idaho..
And find over 1/2 the people who agree with most of what I say/suggest..
ANd STILL the election is over 50% leaning the other way.
This has happened all my life, watching this and persons get tired that they find everyone around them Seem to have voted the same, but the coin flipped the other way.
(Dirty trick #1. Many states passed a law that an election can be legal even less than 50% voted.)
On the post: Senator Hawley's Latest Dumb Anti-230 Plan Would Wipe Out The President's Advantage On Facebook
DEBATE
lets ask a really big question..
If we remove 230, and NOT replace it with something..
HOW bad will it get?
Its not that everything is reversed..
Its not that there is nothing else that can and IS done.
Its that NO ONE will have recourse.. There would be no laws Fore/against what would happen, and Who would be responsible.
LEts drop all the internet bills and laws.
Let it go wild.
Have fun Mr. trump.
You think that politicians acting like 2 year olds trying to figure out launch, is fun..
Lets add the WHOLE school into this, and Then shoot the teachers.
On the post: Senator Thom Tillis Seems Really Pissed Off That The Internet Archive Bought A Record Store To Make Rare Recordings Accessible
well well...
Who remembers SOME of hte contracts of the past...Esp int he age of the 78'
The Artist SOLD everything to the production company. ALL of it. Gained nothing. And generally, NOT even paid that much for it.
Until the artists got together, and another group decided to take charge.. It then got almost worse. The production corps Had all the power Still. And then the artists made a few unions, and got legal backing, AND EVEN in the 70's Artists were still being Screwed. Until they got Enough power to control PART of the songs, music, art.. And Finally got a Small share of the sales. Most ly because the Production companies Held contracts that only let THEM sell the music to Each of the locations.. No one could have any other agencies music, and nothing independent.
And when the Artists die...Who gets the money.. There has been a debate about this, and when the contracts END. And what the artist signed.
On the post: US Falls Out Of Top 10 Fastest Broadband Speeds
We got into the top 10?? wow.
For a nation dedicated tot he propaganda of being the #1 in everything.
Food
Cellphone
Cable TV
MEDICAL
Export of food stocks
PRICES..
Capitalism and competition..
WE stopped competing long ago.
When for some strange reasoning, we had to pay for the best of this and that, but mostly for our Owner/Boss/CEO then we did for anything else.
Its a strange thing to push an economy UP, when there is little reason to do such a thing. The Gov. back in the old days tended to want Employment over wages. Even with abit of unemployment, it was Kinda balanced. And that Most corps that did Good, Spread the wealth around to many employees, NOT just the top boss's and CEO.
Whats entertaining most of this, is HOW many of the corps in the past failed. Or there idea of making money with USA employee and USA materials went By-by, and they Moved out of the USA to locations with less Environmental protection, lower material costs, and Employee's with NO RIGHTS.
The ones that HAD to stay, and take over became fewer, but the restrictions changed to bring others back, but WHO is getting the high wages? Who is paying for the Material costs?
There arnt many Metals made in the USA now. They are for specific companies, and a good share of them are exported. So we are left with plastics and Trying to make them NOT pollute. But we have most of that from imports from countries that have not figured out WHY we dont use it.
What is our problem?
To many. To many of the Corps from the bottom tot he top have Cut employee due to a few things, Most of which is modernization. You dont need 10,000 people to dig the Materials out anymore. But the prices never went down. The Gov has done the same things, Cut corners, Cut personnel, and give the corps/rich money. Dont balance anything from the lower paid to the top paid.
Something Iv mentioned to friends int he past. There are many ways to wage war. You dont need tanks and guns and bombs. If you can control the food(we export over 60%), control an economy(love that stock market and its change on WHEN a corp needs to buy back all those stocks)(est Forced evaluation of USA corps is over 100 times the amount of money in the world, how can they do that?)
Stupidity(not teaching people Enough to know they CAN do something about it)
Even police(not knowing the laws and Who pays their wages)
Then to Politics, and the same comment as the police(who pays your wages) And that the People dont get to evaluate what you have done, and base your WAGE on your states Support.
Slowing taking the Control away from the people, and placing it in the hands of those who have the money, in 1 form or another is Fascism..
Capitalism is abit Ruptured, and many of its lies are abounding. They dont like to compete. It loves to ravage other nations. It takes advantage of everything it can.
On the post: Can You Build A Privacy Law That Doesn't Create Privacy Trolls?
Always had this thought..
That Going to court COSTS MONEY..
A regular person can not goto court based on his own education and get much of anything done.
Part of the system has gotten abit Stupid, in that Everything must cost money.
Then there is the idea of fighting the state, and Almost every Judge Must be on the states Side, not unbiased. There have been tons of people that have gone to state courts, to be denied, and then Above that or on Appeal they Finally get the proper Judgements. Or even the reverse, as a corp goes up the ladder, after the state decides against them, and gets a Judgement reversed.
There are parts in this that Could stop some of this, but for some odd reasoning, it costs MORE to pursue, then to just take it in the shorts. The idea of the loser paying the winners fee's. Esp when its the consumer getting it in the shorts. OR at the very least that the Citizen, winner can then fight back to get things straightened out, FULLY.. Not a slap on the wrist for the corps we are fighting.
There are Some laws about False accusations, for the corps, but when it comes down to the citizens we have little to no recourse, that wouldnt cost us MORE or would take so much time out of our lives to process, the Monetary damages wouldnt even cover the time we have taken nor the legal representation, we NOW pay for.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: Wow.
secret..
about 1/2 the people make a comment and never come back to read the rest..
Iv had a few good ones.. but no votes...
Whats the avg number of votes given??
On the post: Investigation Shows Governor's Claims That Democrats Tried To Hack The Georgia Election Were Bullshit
Re: Re: When ?
Its funny that we kill animals that have foot and mouth diease..
But never for those with Foot in mouth.
Next >>