Re: It's the 21st century, kids. Have you never read sci-fi?
Couple of facts about moi:
A. Techdirt fanboy, Yes.
B. Love of Google. Absolutely NO.
C. Agree 100% with Mr. Masnick on every single idea he's posted here. Also no.
However, you throwing around such ridiculous claims, WITHOUT proof, is PRECISELY why your comments keep getting flagged by the community.
You're just a trolling douchebag. Jump on Parler, already.
The idea is that these filters are interoperable amongst platforms, which, prima facie, is good for openness and inclusiveness. But, allowing the design choices of filters to be made by a handful of companies turns them into de facto standards bodies. This provides neither inclusivity nor openness.
Just like Facebook and Twitter picking and choosing who is allowed to post opinions online provides neither inclusivity nor openness.
Homeowner must sign a waiver. I'm pretty sure, as TechDirt has pointed out in previous Ring posts, that the police department will keep a careful list of homeowners who "politely decline" to sign a waiver.
AOC can add that to her list of people we should go after...... :)
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: A "safe space" for leftists / snowflakes means WITHOUT DISSE
Mmmmm, the psychosis is strong in this one......
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: Maz jeers at this? Why? Do you want insults and bullying, Ma
So, what you're saying is you prefer to stalk Mr. Masnick on Twitter and TechDirt? Sounds like a true TechDirt fanboi…… :)
Awww, him lervs him some Maz….:P
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: Re: Again Maz don't know 'bout common law terms:
"cheaty"? Really?
chortle
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: Re: Again Maz don't know 'bout common law terms:
Once again, not true. I've had several of my comments flagged. And you know what? I don't really care :)
I still read TechDirt because of their expertise and reputation, not necessarily their politics.
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: Re: Again Maz don't know 'bout common law terms:
Ok, lawyer boi, please provide a link to the exact webpage that shows where Mr. Masnick is doing anything illegal. I would LOVE to see it.
FTFY
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: preventing "conservatives" from even being seen...
Uh, actually, I'm a conservative. You see me gleefully replying to your shitposts….
On the post: Will Parler Users Treat Its 'Glitch' That Hid Georgia Election Content The Same Way They Treated A Twitter Glitch?
Re: Re: Twitter censoring and leftist harassment are SAME thing.
Then.....uh....stop posting here, maybe???
I dunno. If you put your hand on a hot stove and get burned, is it really a good idea to put your hand BACK on the same stove?
Think??
On the post: US Military Is Buying Location Data From Data Brokers, Including Data Pulled From US App Users
Re: It's the 21st century, kids. Have you never read sci-fi?
Couple of facts about moi:
A. Techdirt fanboy, Yes.
B. Love of Google. Absolutely NO.
C. Agree 100% with Mr. Masnick on every single idea he's posted here. Also no.
However, you throwing around such ridiculous claims, WITHOUT proof, is PRECISELY why your comments keep getting flagged by the community.
You're just a trolling douchebag. Jump on Parler, already.
On the post: White House Offers To Allow Renaming Confederate Bases... In Exchange For Getting Rid Of Section 230
Re: Well that's such a terrible deal.
I spent 8 years stationed at Fort Bliss, Texas. It was anything but.... :P
On the post: White House Offers To Allow Renaming Confederate Bases... In Exchange For Getting Rid Of Section 230
Re: Dorsey has recently stated that Twitter is NOT a publisher,
It's painfully obvious you have no concept of the difference between Moderation, Discretion and Censorship.
Oh, how convenient, here's a primer:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200521/10454244546/moderation-v-discretion-v-censorship- theyre-not-same.shtml
FTFY
On the post: White House Offers To Allow Renaming Confederate Bases... In Exchange For Getting Rid Of Section 230
Re:
full of spam links and.....shit? It was shit that you were going to type next, right??
On the post: White House Offers To Allow Renaming Confederate Bases... In Exchange For Getting Rid Of Section 230
Insanity check
This whole thing (trading the signing of the NDAA for repealing Section 230) is just 12 types of stupid in an 8 stupid bag.
On the post: Twitch's No Good, Very Bad Time Continues: Part 2
Tim had to post TWICE within 24 hours...
That's it. Twitch just isn't worth the time.
I'm out....
On the post: Upload Filters And The Internet Architecture: What's There To Like?
Re: Dumb it down to a third grade level so nasch can understand.
Duly noted.
On the post: Upload Filters And The Internet Architecture: What's There To Like?
Re: Re: Re:
Wow. Context really eludes you, doesn't it. Your vacuous trolling know no bounds. But hey, you do you. :)
On the post: Upload Filters And The Internet Architecture: What's There To Like?
Re:
I named only 2 platforms, not the entire internet.
FTFY
On the post: Upload Filters And The Internet Architecture: What's There To Like?
Content moderation? Say it ain't so...
The idea is that these filters are interoperable amongst platforms, which, prima facie, is good for openness and inclusiveness. But, allowing the design choices of filters to be made by a handful of companies turns them into de facto standards bodies. This provides neither inclusivity nor openness.Just like Facebook and Twitter picking and choosing who is allowed to post opinions online provides neither inclusivity nor openness.
Got it.
On the post: Mississippi City Trying To Turn Residents' Doorbell Cameras Into Law Enforcement Surveillance Network
Not to mention...
Homeowner must sign a waiver. I'm pretty sure, as TechDirt has pointed out in previous Ring posts, that the police department will keep a careful list of homeowners who "politely decline" to sign a waiver.
AOC can add that to her list of people we should go after...... :)
On the post: To Prevent Free, Frictionless Access To Human Knowledge, Publishers Want Librarians To Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Waiting for the takedown
Patiently waiting on Mike's followup article where Sci-Hub is sued by someone for DCMA takedown action.....
On the post: Cable TV Execs Move Past Denial Stage, Now Fully Expect A 'Cord Cutting' Bloodbath
Bloodbath to come...
Gotta agree with Anonymous Coward on this one. (Although I use a Kindle for books)
Just chilling on the couch, with a big bowl of popcorn, watching the cable companies implode.... LOL
Next >>