Mmmm ... and give Democracy back to the people by outlawing political lobbying, your vote should be yours, not yours until some big corporation 'buys' whoever you voted for.
Hey, at least you got a reply =)
I'm still waiting for him trying to justify twisting the terminology to suit his needs.
But yes, i agree that he is a bit like Darryl, he wont reply to any of the hard questions.
If it diverts an income stream from a rights holder it is theft.
I think you'll find that if you look up the legal definition of theft, and then the legal definition of copyright infringement you'll notice a few things.
Like ... they're two different things.
- "Hang on" you say
- "Calling things by their proper names ? surely this must be witchcraft!" you say
As it turns out ... no, it is not.
It's the intellectually honest thing to do, to actually use the right terms.
You don't point at the saltshaker and ask yer wife to pass you the hammer do you ?
More to the point though, Vivaelamor never said copyright infringement was not a crime, she merely pointed out that that crime is not THEFT, and mixing up the terminology is just plain bad.
Those are the best kind of trolls imo =), when they can't even be arsed to read your reply and respond to it people tend to dismiss anything they say after that.
But aye, maybe Mike should create a new usercategory named "Trollslayer" =)
Hang in there sister, we must be strong and fight stupidity wherever it creeps out.
Tbh DH ...
This is awesome, i mean Darryl is obviously a few fries short of a happymeal.
If he's the one chosen to argument for 'the other side' here ... it's gunna be a very very short argument once someone explains to him (real slow like and none of dem scary big words) that he lost the argument.
Just think how many people are now out on the streets that would otherwise have been passive news consumers in their own homes.
Sure, by cutting communications they might have made it a tiny bit harder for the really motivated people to organize big protests, but as it is now they have people on the streets that would never have gone if they could get news and reports in the safety of their own homes.
"That is what the data retention law is about, THEY HAVE TO RETAIN THAT DATA, in plain text, human readable form,
So if you have an account with that ISP, that ISP will have to provide the IP you used at the time, your Name and your Address.
No VPN is going to stop that from occuring."
You seem like you don't fully grasp how a VPN works, think of it as surfing via a proxy server, all the logs from the ISP will show you connected to the VPN - not the target webpage/service/ftp/newsserver/tracker/whatever.
So in plaintext, the ISP will hand over the logs, but the logs will be useless since they will only show you connected to the VPN.
And before you even start, a VPN is a service, not an ISP, so the law does not apply to a VPN.
The logs would not be encrypted to start with, but all the traffic IN the logs would be to the VPN instead of the destination website.
They can fully comply with the law and hand over the useless logs.
So yes, That will work.
We should all be grateful Mike, this is a user who has taken it upon himself to provide us with cheap laughs.
Granted the humor might be unintentional, but a laugh is a laugh.
In my personal experience Ernie Ball wont last as long, but in Ernie Balls defense though i have to admit that there has been a fair amount of guitarplaying at parties so i might not have been entirely sober when most of those strings broke =).
What you missed here mike is that they're bringing up the debate on the SWIFT agreement again, this - valid or not - is bringing up the sharing of banking data with the US.
Potentially this could wreck a lot of information sharing between the EU and the US.
Most countries see it as an act of war when you kidnap and torture their citizens.
So uuh ... srsly, what the hell are we complaining about really ? due to OUR actions they can justify a war against us, yet we blame THEM.
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's play set theory
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's play set theory
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Let's play set theory
I'm still waiting for him trying to justify twisting the terminology to suit his needs.
But yes, i agree that he is a bit like Darryl, he wont reply to any of the hard questions.
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: missing for how long ???
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Let's play set theory
I think you'll find that if you look up the legal definition of theft, and then the legal definition of copyright infringement you'll notice a few things.
Like ... they're two different things.
- "Hang on" you say
- "Calling things by their proper names ? surely this must be witchcraft!" you say
As it turns out ... no, it is not.
It's the intellectually honest thing to do, to actually use the right terms.
You don't point at the saltshaker and ask yer wife to pass you the hammer do you ?
More to the point though, Vivaelamor never said copyright infringement was not a crime, she merely pointed out that that crime is not THEFT, and mixing up the terminology is just plain bad.
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: So what is it ?? Is your education system THAT bad !!
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: Re: Re: missing for how long ???
But aye, maybe Mike should create a new usercategory named "Trollslayer" =)
Hang in there sister, we must be strong and fight stupidity wherever it creeps out.
On the post: Vivaelamor's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
Re: Re: missing for how long ???
This is awesome, i mean Darryl is obviously a few fries short of a happymeal.
If he's the one chosen to argument for 'the other side' here ... it's gunna be a very very short argument once someone explains to him (real slow like and none of dem scary big words) that he lost the argument.
On the post: The Impact Of Egypt Cutting Itself Off From The Internet
Cutting net might have been a big mistake.
Sure, by cutting communications they might have made it a tiny bit harder for the really motivated people to organize big protests, but as it is now they have people on the streets that would never have gone if they could get news and reports in the safety of their own homes.
On the post: If The MPAA Takes Down A Dozen Torrent Sites, And No One Notices, Did They Really Exist?
On the post: Does Your ISP Care About Protecting Your Privacy?
Typo spotted
( http://www.bahnhof.se/ )
On the post: Swedish ISP Will Automatically Encrypt All Traffic To Protect Privacy Under New Data Retention Laws
Re: Re: Re: Gun analogy
So if you have an account with that ISP, that ISP will have to provide the IP you used at the time, your Name and your Address.
No VPN is going to stop that from occuring."
You seem like you don't fully grasp how a VPN works, think of it as surfing via a proxy server, all the logs from the ISP will show you connected to the VPN - not the target webpage/service/ftp/newsserver/tracker/whatever.
So in plaintext, the ISP will hand over the logs, but the logs will be useless since they will only show you connected to the VPN.
And before you even start, a VPN is a service, not an ISP, so the law does not apply to a VPN.
On the post: Swedish ISP Will Automatically Encrypt All Traffic To Protect Privacy Under New Data Retention Laws
Re: From the "yea, that'all work Dept.
They can fully comply with the law and hand over the useless logs.
So yes, That will work.
On the post: Swedish ISP Will Automatically Encrypt All Traffic To Protect Privacy Under New Data Retention Laws
Re:
They have serverfarms in several cities, the one in Stockholm is housed in a cold war era nuclear bunker(http://www.bahnhof.net/).
On the post: Band Tries To Take 'Open Source' Lessons To The Music World
Re: Re: Re:
Granted the humor might be unintentional, but a laugh is a laugh.
On the post: Jim D'Addario Defends His Support Of COICA & Domain Seizures
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Jim D'Addario Defends His Support Of COICA & Domain Seizures
Re: Re:
As much as i like their product, they will no longer have my support.
To the point where i will knowingly use an inferior product.
On the post: The Companies Who Support Censoring The Internet
Re:
Dear Sir. Kindly explain to me HOW THE FUCK a pair of Nikes get stolen over the web.
That is all.
On the post: EU MPs Investigating US Info Snooping To See If It Violates EU Privacy Laws
Potentially this could wreck a lot of information sharing between the EU and the US.
On the post: Wikileaks Reveals That The US Won't Comply With Treaty Obligations Concerning Investigations Into CIA Rendition
Food for thought...
So uuh ... srsly, what the hell are we complaining about really ? due to OUR actions they can justify a war against us, yet we blame THEM.
Next >>