if you were a person unable to get the vaccine and are worried then stay home. again, not my problem. this is a virus that has a 99.8 survival rate and those who died are almost all elderly and those with underlying health problems. a vaccine us completely unnecessary to control it. you're probably stupid enough to believe that children need the vaccine. you people are all collectivists. just believe faucci the moron and wear your face diapers.
nice strawman. the vaccine was unnecessary to end the pandemic. the solution was very simple. the vulnerable protect themselves and everyone else live their lives and get the virus. the fact is that this virus is only dangerous to a very small demographic. the lockdown, face diapers and everything else was just a power grab by the tyrants.
you're confused. you are responsible for your own health, not me. my vaccination status is irrelevant to your health. the vaccines either work or they don't. if they don't then you're all fools. if they do they you have nothing to worry about.
i made no statement or assertion about the merits of speeding up the development of vaccines. i simply said that the public can and should be able to make their own decisions about what is true. i know it's a new concept for you but this is called liberty.
very true. it is almost always the case that "misinformation" is speech that someone dislikes and not speech that is untrue. there are countless recent examples of censorship based on "misinformation" only to later be allowed. the idea of censoring people's speech about covid information because the speech is "misinformation" is ridiculous. someone making a false statement about covid harms no one. if you're not adult enough to discern what is true and what is not then that is your problem. is seems clear that the concept of personal responsibility does not exist anymore.
and as good libturd that loves taxes you're free to give extra taxes each year. but as the hypocrite that you are you won't do that. you just expect everyone to pay for your shit. and i was 100% correct -- gov does nothing well. no gov anywhere.
apparently you're unaware of skylink. there is a free market solution that will provide fast broadband to rural areas. your problem is that you think government is always the solution to every problem. you ignore history. government does nothing well and the less government we have the better off we all are. and no i don't believe everyone should live in cities. on the contrary i think cities are horrible, festering shit holes run by leftists. and btw i live in a rural area so your asinine assumptions are of course all wrong. my point about personal responsibility was lost on you. the point was that your decisions have consequences and when you don't get the desired result (no internet) it does not mean that you have the right to steal my money to fix it.
and that is no justification for big government. hear me: i don't want to pay for this shit and i should not be forced to do so. the free market may not have provided internet for those people but tough shit. if you don't like it then move. those people chose to live in those locations and your actions have consequences. others poor choices should not force me to pay higher taxes and endure a bigger government. if you want to pay for it then send the gov extra money. don't steal my money to pay for your bad choices.
no, you're the one without understanding. as a good leftist you assume that only government can accomplish anything good. you need your mommy government to do everything for you. actually the free market will accomplish what the public wants & needs at the fair market price. you don't understand that more and bigger government always means less freedom and liberty. like all leftists you think the ends justify the means, but they never do.
government has no business funding broadband. this is simply not the function of government. stealing my money so you can have free internet is beyond a bad idea.
Re: Re: Re: Isn't that hard at all, or beating a dead horse
do my exercise and plan a road trip from seattle to chicago. in doing so you'll find that getting a fast charge station is not possible at very many locations. and even 30 minutes is unacceptable. anything more than 10 minutes is unacceptable. but seriously try the planning exercise and you'll see how foolish an EV really is.
Re: Isn't that hard at all, or beating a dead horse
time to charge is the big problem. waiting hours for a charge is just unacceptable. the next big problem is range -- EVs just don't go nearly far enough on a charge.
you may believe that the switch is necessary, but it is not practical. evs are really only good for an around town commuter and vehicle to go shopping with, etc. try to go on any kind of a road trip and you'll find it isn't possible. here's an exercise to prove my point. pretend you own a nissan leaf and you want to drive from seattle to chicago. tell me how long it will take in an ev vs. a gasoline car. once you do this math you'll see my point. evs are way to restrictive to be usable for all uses. there is no way i'm waiting more than about 10 minutes to fill my tank, either a battery tank or gas tank.
Re: Re: If you can't win an honest game rig it until you do.
conservative means believing in very limited, small government. there is not a single democrat or liberal alive today that believes that. by definition, today, liberals want & love big government & high taxes. you simply cannot believe that and be a conservative because there is an inverse relationship between the size of government and your freedom/liberty. we cannot be a free people with big government.
i agree with both of you that the isps do not treat customers fairly. i'm a comcast customer and i know their pricing models and customer treatment is horrible. they get no sympathy from me. and i disagree with any and all subsidies to any industry or business -- ever. it should be ended immediately, but that does not justify stealing my money to pay for someone else's broadband service.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re:
if you were a person unable to get the vaccine and are worried then stay home. again, not my problem. this is a virus that has a 99.8 survival rate and those who died are almost all elderly and those with underlying health problems. a vaccine us completely unnecessary to control it. you're probably stupid enough to believe that children need the vaccine. you people are all collectivists. just believe faucci the moron and wear your face diapers.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re:
nice strawman. the vaccine was unnecessary to end the pandemic. the solution was very simple. the vulnerable protect themselves and everyone else live their lives and get the virus. the fact is that this virus is only dangerous to a very small demographic. the lockdown, face diapers and everything else was just a power grab by the tyrants.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re: Re: Re: Re: Government censorship
we're all personally responsible for discerning the truth and finding the facts. we don't need censorship to "help us".
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re:
you're confused. you are responsible for your own health, not me. my vaccination status is irrelevant to your health. the vaccines either work or they don't. if they don't then you're all fools. if they do they you have nothing to worry about.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re: Re: Government censorship
i made no statement or assertion about the merits of speeding up the development of vaccines. i simply said that the public can and should be able to make their own decisions about what is true. i know it's a new concept for you but this is called liberty.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re: Re: Re: Government censorship
give one objective example of false information that would absolutely harm me. just one. i'm waiting.
On the post: Senator Klobuchar Proposes An Unconstitutional Law That Would Kill Legions Of People If Trump Were Still President
Re: Government censorship
On the post: Ohio Republicans Forced To Back Off Unpopular Ban On Community Broadband
and as good libturd that loves taxes you're free to give extra taxes each year. but as the hypocrite that you are you won't do that. you just expect everyone to pay for your shit. and i was 100% correct -- gov does nothing well. no gov anywhere.
On the post: Ohio Republicans Forced To Back Off Unpopular Ban On Community Broadband
apparently you're unaware of skylink. there is a free market solution that will provide fast broadband to rural areas. your problem is that you think government is always the solution to every problem. you ignore history. government does nothing well and the less government we have the better off we all are. and no i don't believe everyone should live in cities. on the contrary i think cities are horrible, festering shit holes run by leftists. and btw i live in a rural area so your asinine assumptions are of course all wrong. my point about personal responsibility was lost on you. the point was that your decisions have consequences and when you don't get the desired result (no internet) it does not mean that you have the right to steal my money to fix it.
On the post: Ohio Republicans Forced To Back Off Unpopular Ban On Community Broadband
and that is no justification for big government. hear me: i don't want to pay for this shit and i should not be forced to do so. the free market may not have provided internet for those people but tough shit. if you don't like it then move. those people chose to live in those locations and your actions have consequences. others poor choices should not force me to pay higher taxes and endure a bigger government. if you want to pay for it then send the gov extra money. don't steal my money to pay for your bad choices.
On the post: Ohio Republicans Forced To Back Off Unpopular Ban On Community Broadband
no, you're the one without understanding. as a good leftist you assume that only government can accomplish anything good. you need your mommy government to do everything for you. actually the free market will accomplish what the public wants & needs at the fair market price. you don't understand that more and bigger government always means less freedom and liberty. like all leftists you think the ends justify the means, but they never do.
On the post: Ohio Republicans Forced To Back Off Unpopular Ban On Community Broadband
government has no business funding broadband. this is simply not the function of government. stealing my money so you can have free internet is beyond a bad idea.
On the post: Changing Section 230 Won't Make The Internet A Kinder, Gentler Place
so the author is so pussified that he can't handle offensive content? time to grow a pair.
On the post: Most Used Electric Car Buyers Have No Way To Confirm Vehicle Battery Health
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Isn't that hard at all, or beating a dead ho
even as a second car an EV is unacceptable. why anyone would deliberately buy a car with such constraints is beyond me.
On the post: Most Used Electric Car Buyers Have No Way To Confirm Vehicle Battery Health
Re: Re: Re: Isn't that hard at all, or beating a dead horse
do my exercise and plan a road trip from seattle to chicago. in doing so you'll find that getting a fast charge station is not possible at very many locations. and even 30 minutes is unacceptable. anything more than 10 minutes is unacceptable. but seriously try the planning exercise and you'll see how foolish an EV really is.
On the post: Most Used Electric Car Buyers Have No Way To Confirm Vehicle Battery Health
Re: Isn't that hard at all, or beating a dead horse
time to charge is the big problem. waiting hours for a charge is just unacceptable. the next big problem is range -- EVs just don't go nearly far enough on a charge.
On the post: Most Used Electric Car Buyers Have No Way To Confirm Vehicle Battery Health
Re: Electromobility isn't that easy after all.
you may believe that the switch is necessary, but it is not practical. evs are really only good for an around town commuter and vehicle to go shopping with, etc. try to go on any kind of a road trip and you'll find it isn't possible. here's an exercise to prove my point. pretend you own a nissan leaf and you want to drive from seattle to chicago. tell me how long it will take in an ev vs. a gasoline car. once you do this math you'll see my point. evs are way to restrictive to be usable for all uses. there is no way i'm waiting more than about 10 minutes to fill my tank, either a battery tank or gas tank.
On the post: EFF Tells Court Defendants Must Be Allowed To Examine The DNA Software Used To Convict Them
Re:
On the post: Arizona County's Voting Machines Rendered Unusable By OAN-Financed Vote Auditors
Re: Re: If you can't win an honest game rig it until you do.
On the post: Big Telecom Sues New York State For Trying To Bring Cheap Broadband To Poor People
Re: Re: Re: Re:
i agree with both of you that the isps do not treat customers fairly. i'm a comcast customer and i know their pricing models and customer treatment is horrible. they get no sympathy from me. and i disagree with any and all subsidies to any industry or business -- ever. it should be ended immediately, but that does not justify stealing my money to pay for someone else's broadband service.
Next >>