First Amendment. The court order is compelling speech, in the form of computer code, against the "speaker's" will in violation of the 1st Amendment. Fifth Amendment. Apple is not being afforded due process of law by being subjected to this order. Fourth Amendment. Arguably, the court order functions as a "seizure" of Apple's property in that the intellectual property of Apple is, in effect, being stolen by compelling Apple to write additional code. It is a public taking without just compensation. The court order requires Apple to write the code necessary to achieve the ends the FBI seeks. This is a public taking without just compensation.
As an Indiana constituent, and on behalf of cockroaches everywhere, I find it an insult to cockroaches that you would compare them to Indiana legislators!
I think what the judge here is saying is that those involved in these conversations are trying to create a "virtual booth" by speaking in hushed tones, covering their mouths and moving away from others when they speak etc.
On the post: No, A Judge Did Not Just Order Apple To Break Encryption On San Bernardino Shooter's iPhone, But To Create A New Backdoor
Re: Re:
On the post: Tesla Fan 'Incivility' Forces Indiana To Back Off Direct Sales Ban... For Now
Insult to cockroaches
On the post: Judge Wants To Know More About FBI's Secret Recordings Of Conversations Near Courthouse Steps
Re: I'm not sure this is wrong.
Next >>