Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?
The FBI is a governmental agency tasked with the duty of upholding the law and serving the public.
And a pretty piss-poor job they've been doing, at that. Unless you consider siding with corporate and media interests over the people "serving the public." Oh, wait - judging by your history, you do.
Anonymous is a bunch of hackers who engage in criminal behavior.
And the FBI would never stoop to criminal behavior. They would never manufacture evidence. They would never lie in court. They would never wiretap without warrant.
Who do you think has more to lose from getting caught lying?
Given the FBI's storied history of lying through their proverbial teeth and not giving and apparent rat's ass about how it affects their public image, I would have to say that Anonymous would.
If she were to throw in Evelyn Evelyn as an opening act, I'd gladly give $30,000 (in the alternate reality that I could afford it, that is... le sigh).
On the post: Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database
Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?
And the FBI would never stoop to criminal behavior. They would never manufacture evidence. They would never lie in court. They would never wiretap without warrant.
Given the FBI's storied history of lying through their proverbial teeth and not giving and apparent rat's ass about how it affects their public image, I would have to say that Anonymous would.
On the post: Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database
Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?
On the post: Far Beyond Filtering: Is The GOP Looking To Shut Down Porn Producers?
Re: Re:
On the post: French Publishers Want In On German Plan To Force Everyone To Pay To Link To News
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Big Banks Finally Punishing Employees For Fraud... Like The Call Center Guy Who Used A Fake Dime 50 Years Ago
Re:
On the post: 2012 Democrats: Remember That Civil Liberties Thing From 2008? Um, Nevermind
Re: Re: Principled politician?
On the post: Hall & Oates Convince Super PAC Named After Them To Shut Down
Re:
On the post: Apple's Argument: Samsung Could Have Made Its Phone Large, Thick, Bumpy, Sharp-Edged & Hexagonal
Re: Re: I don't see the problem with Apple's arguments
On the post: Jimmy Wales Confident That UK Gov't Won't Ignore 200,000+ Signatures Against O'Dwyer Extradition
Re: White House Petition
On the post: The Oatmeal v. Funnyjunk: How The Court Of Public Opinion Beats The Court Of Baseless Legal Threats
Re: Re: Re: Funnyjunk isn't entirely wrong
On the post: No Record Label, But Amanda Palmer Raises Over $100k In Just Six Hours On Kickstarter
Re: Home Concert/Dinner with AFP Backers
On the post: Is Getting Sued For Patent Infringement The Equivalent Of Frat Hazing For A Growing Tech Company?
He used that as an example, instead of a car analogy? Oh, how the mighty have fallen...
On the post: Did DOJ Provoke Anonymous On Purpose?
Re: Re: Riddle me this
On the post: More People Waking Up To The Troubling Implications Of The Gov't Taking $500 Million From Google
Re: Re:
Whoopsie. Did your partisan cover get blown?
On the post: Kevin Smith Explains Why He Had To Waste $9,316 On Movie Ads That He Didn't Want Or Need
Re: Kevin Smith is so awesome...
Clerks 2
On the post: This Post Is Not About Steve Jobs
Re: Re: Re: Re: CmdrTaco
On the post: Can Health And Human Services Copyright New Smoking Package Warnings?
Re:
On the post: Official Geolocation Privacy Bill Introduced: Say No To Unauthorized GPS Tracking
Re:
On the post: Are There More Hacks & Breaches This Year... Or Is It Just Shark Attack Week?
On the post: Mexican Senator Drafts Resolution Asking Government To Reject ACTA
1. Big Media lets it be known that if this passes, they will refuse to buy any more cocaine from Mexico.
2. Mexican drug cartels pressure the government to approve ACTA.
3. ACTA passes.
4. ???
5. PROFIT!
Next >>