I think V2V/V2I still make sense because of the extra bandwidth that can be used:
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.
—Tanenbaum, Andrew S. (1989). Computer Networks. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. p. 57. ISBN 0-13-166836-6.
There's a lot of band-width in a station wagon.
-Gruenberger, Fred (1971). Computing: A Second Course. San Francisco: Canfield Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-0063834057. Retrieved 24 January 2017.
the DNS system was a replacement for the hosts files witch FidoNet still uses.
the Internet Engineering Task Force knew there was going to be to issues, but because the internet was small and there were not any bad actors in the 1980s.
if we go back to the host files setup say hello to the yellow pages phone directory
my feeling, the next generation of the DNS system will be built upon a Distributed hash table
the problem with blockchain storage and transferring:
7 billion people
256 characters for a domain name
2 bytes per character for Unicode
(7,000,000,000x256)x2 byte = 3.58400 terabytes of storage and the blockchain has to be transferred within 2 minutes window or the node is out of sync with the network
25.08800 zettabytes of data to transfer globally to 7 billion people
Realistically, it would have been near-impossible to get millions of people to start their own web pages
"A: There are historical precedents for this question:
Is everyone going to want to run their own personal computer?
Is everyone going to want to run their own (cell) phone (number)?
The answer used to be no, until it became obvious that the answer was yes.
Currently not everyone wants to run their own website, partially because it's not clear why, and partially because there's no one-click-install for the IndieWeb. We're solving both of those problems.
For now, those who want to run their own sites can, and those who don't want to don't have to.
There will be network effects (e.g. with peer-to-peer federated indieweb comments) as more people do so in the future. But the great thing is that if you are publishing on your own site, you are getting an immediate benefit out of it now (extra control and flexibility), and are still syndicating to existing social network silos like Twitter and Facebook." - https://indieweb.org/FAQ#Is_everyone_going_to_want_to_run_their_own_website
"For years, Viacom continuously and secretly uploaded its content to YouTube, even while publicly complaining about its presence there. It hired no fewer than 18 different marketing agencies to upload its content to the site. It deliberately "roughed up" the videos to make them look stolen or leaked. It opened YouTube accounts using phony email addresses. It even sent employees to Kinko's to upload clips from computers that couldn't be traced to Viacom. And in an effort to promote its own shows, as a matter of company policy Viacom routinely left up clips from shows that had been uploaded to YouTube by ordinary users. Executives as high up as the president of Comedy Central and the head of MTV Networks felt "very strongly" that clips from shows like The Daily Show and The Colbert Report should remain on YouTube. Viacom's efforts to disguise its promotional use of YouTube worked so well that even its own employees could not keep track of everything it was posting or leaving up on the site. As a result, on countless occasions Viacom demanded the removal of clips that it had uploaded to YouTube, only to return later to sheepishly ask for their reinstatement. In fact, some of the very clips that Viacom is suing us over were actually uploaded by Viacom itself. — Zahavah Levine, Chief Counsel, YouTube"
On the post: Techdirt Sues ICE After It Insists It Has No Records Of The 1 Million Domains It Claims To Have Seized
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Forget 'Breaking Up' Internet Companies, Senator Josh Hawley Says They Should All Die Because They're Too Popular
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Everything can become addictive to the right person, that why we have so many Addiction recovery groups
On the post: Section 230 Keeps The Internet Open For Innovation
Re:
IP = intellectual property?
or IP = internet protocol?
95% of all IP address on the Internet are dynamically reassigned every 24 hours.
is a burner Ip like a burner Cell phone?
On the post: Nintendo Slays The Threat From Modded Nintendo Games For The Commodore 64
Hang on should the original be out of copyright by now if the laws had not been f*ck with
On the post: Austrian Government Wants To Outlaw Online Anonymity
misread Austria as Australia
Why do I misread Austria as Australia?
On the post: The Next Step In The Podcast Wars: Two Companies Looking To Be The Netflix Of Podcasts Start Fighting
I'm seeing glitches in the Matrix. we have been down this path before
see Concentration_of_media_ownership
1920s Commercial radio
1970s cable tv
2000s: youtube blip.tv multi-channel networks
Neo, you're our only hope.....
On the post: Mercedes Goes To Court To Get Background Use Of Public Murals In Promotional Pics Deemed Fair Use
waaaaaah wheres my money?
On the post: Don't Regulate The Internet Like Every Company Is The Same
Re: Once again, break up the big tech
hang on, did we break up the AT&T Corp in the 1970s / early 1980s, and they are worser today than before the breakup
On the post: Welcome To The Prude Internet: No More Sex Talk Allowed
The internet is for porn!
The internet is for [censored] or car videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=[censored by the EU]
On the post: After Insisting That EU Copyright Directive Didn't Require Filters, France Immediately Starts Promoting Filters
Re: Re: Re:
tell that to kim dotcom
On the post: Salesforce Sued For Sex Trafficking... Because Backpage Used Salesforce's CRM
Re: Recursive Intermediate Liability
next Kevin bacon will be summoned to court
On the post: Enough MEPs Say They Mistakenly Voted For Articles 11 & 13 That The Vote Should Have Flipped; EU Parliament Says Too Bad
Re: Re:
I think V2V/V2I still make sense because of the extra bandwidth that can be used:
the current issues are the Channel access methods are unsuitable
On the post: Enough MEPs Say They Mistakenly Voted For Articles 11 & 13 That The Vote Should Have Flipped; EU Parliament Says Too Bad
Re: Re: Re: Re:
the DNS system was a replacement for the hosts files witch FidoNet still uses.
the Internet Engineering Task Force knew there was going to be to issues, but because the internet was small and there were not any bad actors in the 1980s.
if we go back to the host files setup say hello to the yellow pages phone directory
my feeling, the next generation of the DNS system will be built upon a Distributed hash table
On the post: Sites Warn EU Users Of Just How Bad Article 13 Will Be
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Only when it
How do you get authorization from 7 billion people?
On the post: Sites Warn EU Users Of Just How Bad Article 13 Will Be
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Only when it's h
then explain Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. case which lasted for 11 years and cost millions of $
On the post: News Organization Like Reuters Supporting The EU Copyright Directive Is A Shameful Support For Censorship
Re: Re:
take our deal or well sue you
On the post: Axel Voss Says Maybe YouTube Shouldn't Exist
so he want legal website dead
So he wants legal website dead like:
and he wants illegal websites to live, WTF
Can I have what he's smoking? :)
On the post: How To Actually Break Up Big Tech
Re:
the problem with blockchain storage and transferring:
(7,000,000,000x256)x2 byte = 3.58400 terabytes of storage and the blockchain has to be transferred within 2 minutes window or the node is out of sync with the network
25.08800 zettabytes of data to transfer globally to 7 billion people
On the post: How To Actually Break Up Big Tech
Re:
"A: There are historical precedents for this question:
Is everyone going to want to run their own personal computer?
Is everyone going to want to run their own (cell) phone (number)?
The answer used to be no, until it became obvious that the answer was yes.
Currently not everyone wants to run their own website, partially because it's not clear why, and partially because there's no one-click-install for the IndieWeb. We're solving both of those problems.
For now, those who want to run their own sites can, and those who don't want to don't have to.
There will be network effects (e.g. with peer-to-peer federated indieweb comments) as more people do so in the future. But the great thing is that if you are publishing on your own site, you are getting an immediate benefit out of it now (extra control and flexibility), and are still syndicating to existing social network silos like Twitter and Facebook." - https://indieweb.org/FAQ#Is_everyone_going_to_want_to_run_their_own_website
have a look at the indieweb project
On the post: Disaster In The Making: Article 13 Puts User Rights At A Disadvantage To Corporate Greed
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
and you have cases where the left-hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc._v._YouTube,_Inc.
"For years, Viacom continuously and secretly uploaded its content to YouTube, even while publicly complaining about its presence there. It hired no fewer than 18 different marketing agencies to upload its content to the site. It deliberately "roughed up" the videos to make them look stolen or leaked. It opened YouTube accounts using phony email addresses. It even sent employees to Kinko's to upload clips from computers that couldn't be traced to Viacom. And in an effort to promote its own shows, as a matter of company policy Viacom routinely left up clips from shows that had been uploaded to YouTube by ordinary users. Executives as high up as the president of Comedy Central and the head of MTV Networks felt "very strongly" that clips from shows like The Daily Show and The Colbert Report should remain on YouTube. Viacom's efforts to disguise its promotional use of YouTube worked so well that even its own employees could not keep track of everything it was posting or leaving up on the site. As a result, on countless occasions Viacom demanded the removal of clips that it had uploaded to YouTube, only to return later to sheepishly ask for their reinstatement. In fact, some of the very clips that Viacom is suing us over were actually uploaded by Viacom itself. — Zahavah Levine, Chief Counsel, YouTube"
Next >>