If the FCC were collecting 3% of fines, well that might reflect the difficulty in dealing with the players in this industry. A 0.003% collection rate amounts to complicity.
Okay, I agree that nicely justifies searching Mr. Dongerous.
What about Mr Fouche, did they need anything other than a name for him? What about the 10,000 other males that they searched, did they need anything other than the fact that they were male? What about the ten thousand unaccompanied passengers they searched, did they need any fact other than that they were unaccompanied?
You keep trying to make this about Mr Dongerous, but if you were capable of reading an article you would find out that the concern is broader principles; it's not about one person, it's about citizens as a whole and how they are treated by our government.
Take me for example: I am a: (1) U.S. citizen (2) man (3) between the ages of eighteen and fifty or sixty[-two], and (5) I travel alone. Oh, and my name starts with the word "coy." Can I expect to be searched the next time I fly from Orlando to Montana via Salt Lake International or not? That sort of seems to depend, doesn't it, on the question of whether or not a search requires all of those criteria or just one. With CBP rules, it certainly doesn't require crossing the border.
And on my phone I keep my email (Gmail); my tax returns (Google Drive); statements from my bank (bank app); and, pretty soon, a list of everything I buy (Google Pay). Not to mention all my passwords in a password wallet. Will they really be able to search it just because I happened to pass through an International Airport?
Operation Culprit: (1) U.S. citizen(2) men (3) between the ages of eighteen and fifty or sixty(4) returning from the Philippines, Thailand, or Cambodia(5) traveling alone (6) with a prior criminal history.
Do you know if they left out an "and" or an "or" there at the end? Personally I'm betting that's an "or", which basically means everyone, excepting maybe a few foreigners.
Yes, if you hurt a journalist, you will get that enhancement. But, if the politicians get their way, soon there will be no journalists anyway. See? No problem.
Re: You don't know the truth are just smearing cops because hate
If a victim in police custody were shackled naked and spread eagle facing a concrete wall, and were shot in the back of the head from a distance of 10 feet, do you suppose then you might concede a slim chance of the death as suspicious?
Nah. These scummy gangstas are just so into creative suicide.
I have no idea. Grand theft by deception. Fraudulent misrepresentation. Falsification of accreditation. Trademark infringement. (Yes, I said trademark infringement, with the University of Farmington in Maine.) Causing crimes to be committed by people who were law-abiding, depriving them of a legal benefit. A bonus for just being plain old a$$holes.
It should be good for around $250,000 per student. ICE can pay for this instead of the wall.
On the post: Grandstanding GOP Senators Continue To Mislead About Social Media Bias, Demand A 'Fairness Doctrine' For The Internet
Snowflakes
It used to be that the GOP complained about snowflakes. Now they are the snowflakes.
On the post: Former Intelligence Officials Sue The Government Over Its Unconstitutional Pre-Publication Review Process
Why didn't they fix it when they were in office?
Funny how the review process is so broken, when most of these officials were in charge of that process before they wrote a book.
On the post: Just $6,790 Of $208 Million In Robocall Fines Have Been Collected By The FCC
Pro-robocall FCC
If the FCC were collecting 3% of fines, well that might reflect the difficulty in dealing with the players in this industry. A 0.003% collection rate amounts to complicity.
On the post: EU Commissioner Gunther Oettinger Admits: Sites Need Filters To Comply With Article 13
Re: Re: A "gentle" reminder
Only if they filmed it.
On the post: EU Commissioner Gunther Oettinger Admits: Sites Need Filters To Comply With Article 13
A "gentle" reminder
The copyright maximalists will be giving that politico a horse's head in his bed.
On the post: 7th Circuit Punts On Border Smartphone Searches; Says Riley Decision Doesn't Affect Anything
Re: Re: Re: Mr. Dongerous
Okay, I agree that nicely justifies searching Mr. Dongerous.
What about Mr Fouche, did they need anything other than a name for him? What about the 10,000 other males that they searched, did they need anything other than the fact that they were male? What about the ten thousand unaccompanied passengers they searched, did they need any fact other than that they were unaccompanied?
You keep trying to make this about Mr Dongerous, but if you were capable of reading an article you would find out that the concern is broader principles; it's not about one person, it's about citizens as a whole and how they are treated by our government.
Take me for example: I am a: (1) U.S. citizen (2) man (3) between the ages of eighteen and fifty or sixty[-two], and (5) I travel alone. Oh, and my name starts with the word "coy." Can I expect to be searched the next time I fly from Orlando to Montana via Salt Lake International or not? That sort of seems to depend, doesn't it, on the question of whether or not a search requires all of those criteria or just one. With CBP rules, it certainly doesn't require crossing the border.
And on my phone I keep my email (Gmail); my tax returns (Google Drive); statements from my bank (bank app); and, pretty soon, a list of everything I buy (Google Pay). Not to mention all my passwords in a password wallet. Will they really be able to search it just because I happened to pass through an International Airport?
On the post: 7th Circuit Punts On Border Smartphone Searches; Says Riley Decision Doesn't Affect Anything
Re: Mr. Dongerous
Do you know if they left out an "and" or an "or" there at the end? Personally I'm betting that's an "or", which basically means everyone, excepting maybe a few foreigners.
On the post: Stupid Law Making Assaulting Journalists A Federal Crime Revived By Congress
What one hand gives...
Yes, if you hurt a journalist, you will get that enhancement. But, if the politicians get their way, soon there will be no journalists anyway. See? No problem.
On the post: Thomas Goolnik Again Convinces Google To Forget Our Story About Thomas Goolnik Getting Google To Forget Our Story About Thomas Goolnik
Re:
...two new stories will be written.
On the post: Sixth Circuit Affirms First Amendment Protections For Flipping Off Cops
Re: Re: Re:
There's no requirement to not hit your thumb with the hammer, either. But it hurts less if you refrain.
On the post: Sheriff Decides The Best Way To Prep Teachers For School Shootings Is To Frighten And Injure Them
Re:
I once knew a parent who used a bullwhip on his kid.
Parent: What did you learn?
Kid: That you are an abusive son of a b****.
On the post: Sheriff Decides The Best Way To Prep Teachers For School Shootings Is To Frighten And Injure Them
Re: Techdirt snowflakes miss point of TRAINING EXERCISE.
I know, right? Here they were trying to teach them to be hopeless subservients, and no one gets that.
On the post: CBP Detains 9-Year-Old US Citizen For 36 Hours, Accuses Her 14-Year-Old Brother Of Sex Trafficking
Re:
Under the circumstances, I would be very happy if it was only a case of not reining them in. But it isn't, rather we have a leader who eggs them on.
On the post: EU Commission Refuses To Explain Why It Published Medium Article Mocking The Public's Concerns Over Article 13
I'm sorry you're...
What are you saying? Hardly anyone has never heard a 5 year old apologize for calling his sister dumb by saying, "I'm sorry you're dumb sis."
This is just the same, apparently perpetrated by someone about the same age.
On the post: Washington Prison Management Software Setting People Free Too Early, Keeping Other People Locked Up Too Long
I make gooder code
I could make software using INT(RANDOM(36135)+1) and sell it to DOC. Would anyone at DOC notice?
On the post: Officer's Body Cam Fails To Capture Footage Of Woman Shooting Herself In The Head While Her Hands Were Cuffed Behind Her
Re: You don't know the truth are just smearing cops because hate
If a victim in police custody were shackled naked and spread eagle facing a concrete wall, and were shot in the back of the head from a distance of 10 feet, do you suppose then you might concede a slim chance of the death as suspicious?
Nah. These scummy gangstas are just so into creative suicide.
On the post: Court Says Lawsuit Over Fake Subpoenas Issued By Louisiana DA's Office Can Proceed
Re: Re: Nothing civil about it
And who is the Bar Association? Lawyers. And the prosecution? Lawyers.
Nobody is getting disbarred for doing this because the lawyers are as bad about policing their own as the cops and the doctors.
On the post: $900 Robot Commits Adorable Seppuku, Showing Again How In The Modern Era You Don't Own What You Buy
Business paradigm
It's the favorite paradigm of business, as exemplified by this Don Feller quote from the song Coin Machine:
On the post: CBP Still Arresting Immigrants Trying To Stay In The Country By Furthering Their Education
Re: Re: Re: accreditation
I have no idea. Grand theft by deception. Fraudulent misrepresentation. Falsification of accreditation. Trademark infringement. (Yes, I said trademark infringement, with the University of Farmington in Maine.) Causing crimes to be committed by people who were law-abiding, depriving them of a legal benefit. A bonus for just being plain old a$$holes.
It should be good for around $250,000 per student. ICE can pay for this instead of the wall.
On the post: Security Researcher Discovers Flaws In Yelp-For-MAGAs App, Developer Threatens To Report Him To The Deep State
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's named z/OS, nowadays.
Next >>