Re: Re: Special Agent Ross is a Nazi, pure and simple.
So if I understand this correctly:
Special agent Ross comes (with?) The Devil's Coachman (to) TDCs house and then beats the crap out of TDC just because TDC owns his own gay that drags TDCs ass to concentration camp where TDC's beaten again (at this point I really don't know by whom).
Why would he go with Ross to his own house to get beaten if his own gay does that for him in a luxury of a concentration camp? Not rational at all...
"But you probably knew that, right? I mean, you wouldn't lie and manipulate would you? No, not Mike. He's such a stand up guy. LMAO! What a joke. You couldn't be honest if your life depended on it."
What do you wnat to achieve with this part?
Your message got across just as nice without all that troll drivel...
Of course you don't (know what he's commenting on AND read every comment/post). You believe you are right. But you also think you know you are right. It's a difference - one is theism and other is gnosticism.
When people believe (or have enough incentive to ignore reality), knowing clashing with beliefs becomes an obstacle. The simple solution is delusion. But by being selective with facts makes assumptions using these facts... well, not true. :)
And if we're using the word obvious... let me have a go at it:
- it's obvious that you post these comment emotionally (and by this I mean that either you're involved with issues at hand emotionally or you're just being an attention-whorish troll)
- it's obvious that you mostly take one side - and it's the opposite of Mike, always (citation needed?)
- it's obvious that you troll (i.e. using logical fallacies and baiting people to react emotionally)
- it's obvious that you don't contribute to the debate
- it's obvious you're a hypocrite (citation needed? really? you make fun of Mike all the time and when served with most plausable assumption - jokes with truth bits in it sting a bit more than jokes made with lies - you call him out on it.)
But hey - we need a norm minimum to know where we stand. :P
Radical people will interpret radical notions from any sentence.
"Do you want extra bacon with that?" would be offensive in muslim world.
"No, I don't believe in Atheism. I just hold no beliefs in any imaginary beings." is offensive to a lot religious people.
"I'm sorry sir. I cannot give you a 2 seat ticket for a price of 1." could be offensive in America - in Europe you're just fat.
So yes - it IS just a question; if we're talking semantics. How you understand and perceive this question is another matter; perception is different for everyone.
Could you explain this oxymoron freetard? Am I a retard because I want and get information for free? Or because I copy and give it away (i.e. share) for free?
I found some explanations on Urban Dictionary and if you'll take the time and follow the link - which definitions do you agree with and which do you not?
I don't think Mike has opponents :) In my view, common sense and valuing arguments proximity to truth is his only "crime".
Let me elaborate - when people resort to dirty tactics like this (agent provocateur) it's ussualy bacause their arguments have no or little standing in reality and as we all know - what better way to hide the truth than discrediting its speaker. It's how a lot of our written history got falsified (and you can't do sh*t about it). But this manipulation got a lot more difficult in the Internet age - finding sockpuppets is a lot easier since you're just connecting identities, not revealing them.
Now this is an unrefutable answer. Too bad "D.C. area" just likes to post the same debunked questions again and again and doesn't care for answers.
It's how U.S. media transformed from "fact reporting" to "balanced opinions" - who needs truth if most of people you reach believe a convenient lie. Your people aren't stupid enough? Scare 'em stupid! Proclaim war against invisible enemies and voila - your own people will start behaving like sheep. It's simple and tested - testing shit abroad and implementing it at home like real Chicago Boys. ;)
These sorts of psychotic comments about murdering the so-called "corrupt" and Judge Howell and beastiality only reveal to lawmakers the character and mental state of opponents to reasonable copyright measures. Thanks Mike for hosting a forum where true substance of the opposition can be put on full display.
You, sir (ma'am?), disgust me. Taking an AC comment (anonymous, probably written by the same shill-machine you in/directly work for) and putting yourself on the same anonymous pedestal just to drop a few of fallacies here? And doing it anonymously? Disgusting...
Analogy: Lawyers like Evan Stone only reveal to voters the character and mental state of proponents to unreasonable copyright measures. Thanks Mike for hosting a forum where true substance of the copyright proposition can be put on full display.
Or you can do what I do, which is run a Tor exit node on a foreign server paid for with anonymous funds.
Irony much? You wouldn't recommend running a TOR exit node, but you do run it, in a big Onion way. You are TOR-ing your tor exit node. Why? Do you have anything to hide?
"adding something to the conversation" sometimes happens, when you act childish and lash at apologists. Not always (since it's a troll technique) but usually integrity of a poster is higher, when they aren't afraid when all of their posts connects them to one identity. You know - a profile. Well, there are exceptions - out_of_the_blue could be one...
:)
On the post: Slovenian Ambassador Apologizes For Signing ACTA [Updated]
Re: Re: Re: Recall
On the post: Slovenian Ambassador Apologizes For Signing ACTA [Updated]
Re: Re:
http://metinalista.si/why-i-signed-acta/
On the post: ICE Admits That It Just Wants To 'Put People In Jail' With Operation In Our Sites
Re:
How is profit irrational? ;)
On the post: ICE Admits That It Just Wants To 'Put People In Jail' With Operation In Our Sites
Re: Re: Special Agent Ross is a Nazi, pure and simple.
Special agent Ross comes (with?) The Devil's Coachman (to) TDCs house and then beats the crap out of TDC just because TDC owns his own gay that drags TDCs ass to concentration camp where TDC's beaten again (at this point I really don't know by whom).
Why would he go with Ross to his own house to get beaten if his own gay does that for him in a luxury of a concentration camp? Not rational at all...
On the post: ICE Admits That It Just Wants To 'Put People In Jail' With Operation In Our Sites
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What do you wnat to achieve with this part?
Your message got across just as nice without all that troll drivel...
On the post: ICE Admits That It Just Wants To 'Put People In Jail' With Operation In Our Sites
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
When people believe (or have enough incentive to ignore reality), knowing clashing with beliefs becomes an obstacle. The simple solution is delusion. But by being selective with facts makes assumptions using these facts... well, not true. :)
And if we're using the word obvious... let me have a go at it:
- it's obvious that you post these comment emotionally (and by this I mean that either you're involved with issues at hand emotionally or you're just being an attention-whorish troll)
- it's obvious that you mostly take one side - and it's the opposite of Mike, always (citation needed?)
- it's obvious that you troll (i.e. using logical fallacies and baiting people to react emotionally)
- it's obvious that you don't contribute to the debate
- it's obvious you're a hypocrite (citation needed? really? you make fun of Mike all the time and when served with most plausable assumption - jokes with truth bits in it sting a bit more than jokes made with lies - you call him out on it.)
But hey - we need a norm minimum to know where we stand. :P
On the post: US Marshals Service Asks Us To Remove A Comment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Do you want extra bacon with that?" would be offensive in muslim world.
"No, I don't believe in Atheism. I just hold no beliefs in any imaginary beings." is offensive to a lot religious people.
"I'm sorry sir. I cannot give you a 2 seat ticket for a price of 1." could be offensive in America - in Europe you're just fat.
So yes - it IS just a question; if we're talking semantics. How you understand and perceive this question is another matter; perception is different for everyone.
On the post: Internet Troll Jailed In The UK For Being A Jerk Online
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Internet Troll Jailed In The UK For Being A Jerk Online
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re: Re:
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re: Re: Re: PaulT, prim schoolmarm.
I found some explanations on Urban Dictionary and if you'll take the time and follow the link - which definitions do you agree with and which do you not?
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Let me elaborate - when people resort to dirty tactics like this (agent provocateur) it's ussualy bacause their arguments have no or little standing in reality and as we all know - what better way to hide the truth than discrediting its speaker. It's how a lot of our written history got falsified (and you can't do sh*t about it). But this manipulation got a lot more difficult in the Internet age - finding sockpuppets is a lot easier since you're just connecting identities, not revealing them.
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's how U.S. media transformed from "fact reporting" to "balanced opinions" - who needs truth if most of people you reach believe a convenient lie. Your people aren't stupid enough? Scare 'em stupid! Proclaim war against invisible enemies and voila - your own people will start behaving like sheep. It's simple and tested - testing shit abroad and implementing it at home like real Chicago Boys. ;)
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re: Re: Re:
You, sir (ma'am?), disgust me. Taking an AC comment (anonymous, probably written by the same shill-machine you in/directly work for) and putting yourself on the same anonymous pedestal just to drop a few of fallacies here? And doing it anonymously? Disgusting...
Analogy:
Lawyers like Evan Stone only reveal to voters the character and mental state of proponents to unreasonable copyright measures. Thanks Mike for hosting a forum where true substance of the copyright proposition can be put on full display.
On the post: Former RIAA Lobbyist, Now Judge, Says Lowest Possible Statutory Damages For Single Case Of Infringement Is $3,430
Re:
On the post: Wasn't The Real Security Problem The Initial Leak Of State Dept. Cables Rather Than The Latest Leak Of Those Same Cables?
Re: Independent minds needed
In US you can label yourself as independant and it has no meaning at all - like a hermit crab in the ocean labeling itself dry. Please...
On the post: If ACTA Is Approved In The US, It May Open The Door For The President To Regularly Ignore Congress On International Agreements
Re:
On the post: Appeals Court: Arresting Guy For Filming Cops Was A Clear Violation Of Both 1st & 4th Amendments
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: ICE Screws Up, Seizes Tor Exit Node; Vows Not to Learn From Its Mistake
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Irony much? You wouldn't recommend running a TOR exit node, but you do run it, in a big Onion way. You are TOR-ing your tor exit node. Why? Do you have anything to hide?
"adding something to the conversation" sometimes happens, when you act childish and lash at apologists. Not always (since it's a troll technique) but usually integrity of a poster is higher, when they aren't afraid when all of their posts connects them to one identity. You know - a profile. Well, there are exceptions - out_of_the_blue could be one...
:)
Next >>