It's really telling that these Anon Cowards are all family of each other. (I suspect something involving moms and bears)
Trying to turn a flippant throwaway remark into something really big. Ignoring the fact that these posts aren't on Lowery, but on responses on Lowery.
Trying to derail the discussion, doing everything in their power NOT to respond to the points.
You Lowery-lovers are lower than low. Trolls are a step up from you.
Re: Re: Re: The reluctance to adapt is a kind of embarrassing nostalgia that glosses over the many sins of the old ways, and it argues for a kind of pity fuck from the market.
It's particularly telling that despite him being everywhere in this thread, he fails to answer your question.
Says the people that have often called "us" freetards, pirates, thieves and other such words.
Boohoo, do these words hurt you, shill? Cry me a river, anonymous coward!
Most of us have tried to get an open debate about this stuff with people such as yourself, and every time the 'discussion' devolves into a "you just want stuff for free, stupid freetard" accusations from your side of the aisle. Look into the history of the comments on this site, there have been many attempts at open discussions.
And also on other blogs, such as the RIAA blogs, where our comments immediately get deleted.
So, for a lot of us, we've given up the debate, and will call you for what you are, a trolling shill.
As long as your side keeps equating file sharing with theft, am I not interested in any kind of debate.
Violence on TV is just fine, but 7 seconds of a naked butt is too much for the FCC?
I'd hate to be married to one of these puritanical weirdos. "Sorry honey, no sex, ever, because you'd be naked for about 7 seconds, and I'd be prone to use crude language."
Inman is a sadist? Whut? He's like Monsanto? What kind of drugs are they smoking? I want none of those!
Clearly these people should remain OFF the internet for good, for their own sake. They don't understand A) humour, and B) how the internet works.
Also to Tara and Charles: The 'mother' in the infamous The Oatmeal comic is not Charles' mom, it's FunnyJunks CEO's mom. Get the facts straight, before you go off the deep end!
NAZI's? You bandy this word around, but I don't think you know what it means.
Go read a few history books, that is, if you can read. And if you can't, I'd suggest you learn to and then read those history books.
There is a place for people like you, it's a psychiatric institution.
On the post: Some Facts & Insights Into The Whole Discussion Of 'Ethics' And Music Business Models
Re:
Trying to turn a flippant throwaway remark into something really big. Ignoring the fact that these posts aren't on Lowery, but on responses on Lowery.
Trying to derail the discussion, doing everything in their power NOT to respond to the points.
You Lowery-lovers are lower than low. Trolls are a step up from you.
On the post: Some Facts & Insights Into The Whole Discussion Of 'Ethics' And Music Business Models
Re: Re: Re: The reluctance to adapt is a kind of embarrassing nostalgia that glosses over the many sins of the old ways, and it argues for a kind of pity fuck from the market.
On the post: Some Facts & Insights Into The Whole Discussion Of 'Ethics' And Music Business Models
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Some Facts & Insights Into The Whole Discussion Of 'Ethics' And Music Business Models
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not enough evidence...
On the post: Miami Heat Owner Sues Blogger & Google Over 'Unflattering' Photo
In this case, he looks like a grandfather sticking out his tongue to his grand kids. That was my first thought when I saw the photo.
On the post: Miami Heat Owner Sues Blogger & Google Over 'Unflattering' Photo
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
Explain how Google exploits artists. And please give proof for your assertions.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
Boohoo, do these words hurt you, shill? Cry me a river, anonymous coward!
Most of us have tried to get an open debate about this stuff with people such as yourself, and every time the 'discussion' devolves into a "you just want stuff for free, stupid freetard" accusations from your side of the aisle. Look into the history of the comments on this site, there have been many attempts at open discussions.
And also on other blogs, such as the RIAA blogs, where our comments immediately get deleted.
So, for a lot of us, we've given up the debate, and will call you for what you are, a trolling shill.
As long as your side keeps equating file sharing with theft, am I not interested in any kind of debate.
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re:
On the post: Supreme Court Overrules Fine For Naked Butt On TV; Punts On 1st Amendment Question
Re: Re:
On the post: Supreme Court Overrules Fine For Naked Butt On TV; Punts On 1st Amendment Question
Weird people, those Americans
I'd hate to be married to one of these puritanical weirdos. "Sorry honey, no sex, ever, because you'd be naked for about 7 seconds, and I'd be prone to use crude language."
On the post: Charles Carreon Keeps Digging: Promises To Subpoena Twitter & Ars Technica To Track Down Parody Account
Re:
Calm
and
Carreon
On the post: Charles Carreon Keeps Digging: Promises To Subpoena Twitter & Ars Technica To Track Down Parody Account
Re: Re: Re:
Clearly these people should remain OFF the internet for good, for their own sake. They don't understand A) humour, and B) how the internet works.
Also to Tara and Charles: The 'mother' in the infamous The Oatmeal comic is not Charles' mom, it's FunnyJunks CEO's mom. Get the facts straight, before you go off the deep end!
On the post: Carreon's Full Filing Reveals He Donated To Oatmeal Campaign Himself, Plus Other Assorted Nuttiness
Re: Re:
Locked him up in concentration camps?
You two need to get your head examined.
On the post: Carreon's Full Filing Reveals He Donated To Oatmeal Campaign Himself, Plus Other Assorted Nuttiness
Re: Re: Re:
Go read a few history books, that is, if you can read. And if you can't, I'd suggest you learn to and then read those history books.
There is a place for people like you, it's a psychiatric institution.
On the post: Matthew Inman To Charles Carreon: Take Time Off, Stop Saying Crazy Sh*t To Journalists, Calm Down
Re: Re: Re: Just curious...
On the post: Monsanto May Be Forced To Repay Brazilian GM Soybean Royalties Worth Billions Of Dollars
Re: It's a good start.
On the post: Matthew Inman To Charles Carreon: Take Time Off, Stop Saying Crazy Sh*t To Journalists, Calm Down
you heard it here first, folks
On the post: Carreon's Full Filing Reveals He Donated To Oatmeal Campaign Himself, Plus Other Assorted Nuttiness
Re:
reward: Eternal internet fame.
Seriously, Tara. Your husband is fighting with windmills here, like a true Don Quixote.
On the post: Charles Carreon Sues Matthew Inman... And The Charities He's Raising Money For
Re: Is this what he thought???
Black hats actually have a clue what they are running, scriptkiddies only have scripts (or in the case of the LOIC, not even a script but a website)
Scriptkiddies are like bugs buzzing around your face, very annoying, and can cause trouble when there's a lot of them.
Black hats are like the tse-tse fly. You won't notice them until it's too late.
Next >>