Here's my idea how to eat the cake and keep it too:
Move the spam comments to a quarantine "post", where they don't do harm to anyone's visual orifices, but are indexed by google, thus detected as spam and demoted in response.
I don't like FB, but at least I can leave it alone, and it leaves me alone. I start to passionately hate G+ because all the crap google gives me on my gmail and yt account about "upgrading" it to g+.
You should proceed, because by not doing so you're committing The fallacy fallacy.
Btw: 3 airplanes hijacked, one of them is destroyed before teh terrorism events. Coincidentally 3 buildings are destroyed, two with flimsy explanation, one (building 7) with even weaker one.
I find the official explanation to be true is possible the same way winning the lottery 10 times in a row is possible. Mathematically it is "possible", but quite improbable.
So we can expect another conveniently timed 9/11 style attack to justify the NSA's existence and provide a convenient casus beli to attack Iran/Syria. Strictly not engineered by the USA ofc, pinky swear!
Bigger bombs, flying in UAVs undetected by magnetometers. The bomb maker is still alive, not like the first responders. And there is huge malevolence in here.
If they're angels, as Mr. Baker suppose, then they (the NSA, FBI, TSA and the other alphabet soup agencies) have no reason to hide, classify things, right?
It should be thrown out solely based on the process of negotiation.
If someone comes up to me and say "I negotiated this 500 page deal in your name, you have 2 hours to read it and say Yes/No" I'd instantly say "NO". Because fuck you, that's why.
First, 8,000 euro fine for quoting another blogger. In real money, that works out to an almost $11,000 fine Is this supposed to mean that you do not consider € "real money" ?
Second, how on earth can a french institute fine a foreigner with no presence in France?
Now, let's say, Uncle Sam want to shovel down a truckload of crap down your throat. You of course don't want to eat shit, so refuse, rebel, protest. Now, Uncle Sam is getting good money to do his job, so he tells you first to close your eye, because it'll be a Surprise! First problem: you don't trust Uncle Sam to do this in the first place. Second problem: you still smell crap that leaks from the truck.
This agreement would fail, transparency or not, because of it's content.
So, if say I write a program that claim ownership of every piece of WB's content and issue an automated takedown notice to every content provider it can find, it's ok? Good.
On the post: Hidden Within The TPP: The RIAA's Secret Plan To Screw Musicians Out Of Their Rights
Re: Re:
On the post: The Joy Of Watching Comment Spammers Scramble To Try To Delete Links After Google Demoted Them
Re: Re: Please to edumicate me.
Move the spam comments to a quarantine "post", where they don't do harm to anyone's visual orifices, but are indexed by google, thus detected as spam and demoted in response.
On the post: Tone Deaf NSA Officials Tell Reporter It's Time To Reform The First Amendment
Re: Re: Re: Good thing...
A strategy of "trust us, the world is an unsafe place" won't resonate now the way it did in the immediate wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Wanna bet that this will be corrected by another Sept. 11 attack?
On the post: Facebook Is Tracking When You Write Something... And Then Decide To Delete It Rather Than Post It
Re: Re: Re: Why?
I start to passionately hate G+ because all the crap google gives me on my gmail and yt account about "upgrading" it to g+.
It's fuckin' annoying.
On the post: CEO Of 21st Century Fox Thinks People Aren't Really Asking For A La Carte TV Channels
Re: Mike doesn't get the point: those who pay $5 for a latte don't care about a few bucks.
I think the saying "less is more" is quite accurate in your case.
On the post: UK Court Rules That Software Functionality Is Not Subject To Copyright
Re: Bah!
Reverse engineering a software doesn't necessary mean you have to install it, meaning you don't have to agree to the EULA.
Problem?
On the post: Feinstein And Rogers Try To Scare Americans With Ooga Booga Terrorism Threats
Re: Response to: Thom on Dec 2nd, 2013 @ 1:43pm
Btw: 3 airplanes hijacked, one of them is destroyed before teh terrorism events. Coincidentally 3 buildings are destroyed, two with flimsy explanation, one (building 7) with even weaker one.
I find the official explanation to be true is possible the same way winning the lottery 10 times in a row is possible. Mathematically it is "possible", but quite improbable.
On the post: Feinstein And Rogers Try To Scare Americans With Ooga Booga Terrorism Threats
Re: Re: Re:
So we can expect another conveniently timed 9/11 style attack to justify the NSA's existence and provide a convenient casus beli to attack Iran/Syria. Strictly not engineered by the USA ofc, pinky swear!
On the post: Feinstein And Rogers Try To Scare Americans With Ooga Booga Terrorism Threats
There are new bombs
There FTFY
On the post: NSA Gave Employees Ridiculous 'Talking Points' To Spread Among Friends And Family Over The Holidays
Re: Re:
I especially like the phrase: "authorized to share the following points", like it were some kind of secret knowledge instead of unabashed propaganda.
On the post: NSA Spied On Porn Habits Of 'Radicalizers,' Planned To Use Details To Embarrass Them
Re:
THEN we can discuss the NSA's discretion.
On the post: US TPP Negotiators Accused Of Bullying; Refusing To Budge On Ridiculous IP And Corporate Sovereignty Demands
Re:
If someone comes up to me and say "I negotiated this 500 page deal in your name, you have 2 hours to read it and say Yes/No" I'd instantly say "NO". Because fuck you, that's why.
On the post: Insanity Rules In East Texas: Jury Finds Newegg Infringes On Ridiculous Encryption Patent
Re: Re: Re: Crazy, but expected
On the post: Keith Alexander Offered To Resign, But White House Said No Because It Didn't Want Snowden To Win
Re: Instead of offering to resign
On the post: French Stock Market Regulator Hits US Blogger With $10K Fine For Publishing Opinion On French Bank's Leverage Ratio
Is this supposed to mean that you do not consider € "real money" ?
Second, how on earth can a french institute fine a foreigner with no presence in France?
On the post: LG Smart TV Caught Collecting Data On Files Stored On Connected USB Drives
Re: Re: Re: Forcing you to accept TOS to use a product should be illegal
"I'm altering the deal. Pray that I do not alter it further."
On the post: Bloomberg Points Out That White House's Near Total Lack Of Transparency May Doom TPP
Lack of transparency is not the problem
Now, let's say, Uncle Sam want to shovel down a truckload of crap down your throat.
You of course don't want to eat shit, so refuse, rebel, protest.
Now, Uncle Sam is getting good money to do his job, so he tells you first to close your eye, because it'll be a Surprise!
First problem: you don't trust Uncle Sam to do this in the first place.
Second problem: you still smell crap that leaks from the truck.
This agreement would fail, transparency or not, because of it's content.
On the post: Warner Bros. Admits To Issuing Bogus Takedowns; Gloats To Court How There's Nothing Anyone Can Do About That
Re: Done by a computer
On the post: DailyDirt: Towards Safer Nuclear Energy
Re: How safe is the spent fuel?
On the post: Congress May Not Be So Eager To Simply Hand Over Its Own Authority To The Obama Administration To Approve TPP
Re:
Next >>