And it's Google. So all of this is suspect. I mean, they changed their story on why they attacked Tulsi Gabbard three times. That's why they are getting sued, and will probably lose.
I think after the 15th time this story pops up, saying something isn't happening you can see with your own eyes, you have to kinda start asking newer, funner questions.
I've been doing it off and on for years. Every once in a while, someone will purchase rights to one of my stories. It's not a lot of money, but it's just the right to do a version of it. I keep my story, and I keep them up free (when I'm doing it). It's not me writing a screenplay. If I can't keep the story up, free, with no ads, on my site (I made that mistake once) I won't give up anything. It's literally how the stories are found. I had one story where I saw big dollar signs and a chance for more work, and I gave them everything, and it took years to get it back when they did nothing with it. And they literally let a timebomb clause run the whole way out rather than just being cool about it. Never again. Also, never trust an anthology series. I've had three now make big promises and they just dry up and blow away after a season.
They did all this work to try to take on and destroy youtube, but youtube is doing all the work themselves. Youtube might just be gone by this time next year. It's already nothing like it was even two years ago. It's becoming a sewer full of worthless network news trash.
It's about censoring conservative viewpoints before an election because they are doubling down on being unethical because they haven't learned anything.
And very unethical people are determined to make sure the poor people don't have a say. Censorship in the US is typically about shutting up those annoying poor people mad at the empire.
They just watched America's Elite try to do a Russian strawman argument against the entire country for three years, and it all end up being a proven hoax. Now they get to watch Google attack the best candidate for being too popular, and the media defend Google like they are just a bad dog and that happens sometimes. If I was any other country, I'd be worried sick.
Is that outside of a handful of good shows that somehow get a free pass, most shows have been diminished or outright ruined with pointless politics. The worst are the shows that went all in on russian conspiracy theory plots that look ridiculous now in light of that all being a hoax. I used to watch about 9 or 10 weekly shows, a few daily shows, and maybe 2 or 3 anime in a given season. Now that's all flipped. As television got worse, Anime got amazing.
Now that Mueller has been eviscerated on CSPAN and we know for a proven fact it was all a hoax, it's good to look back with gentler eyes and just laugh at how theatrical the delusional folks were.
Yes, it's a bummer Google wasn't as smart as they thought
And they got caught manipulating people. And they'll probably get broken up again. And it's their own fault.
While this apology for unethical Internet companies is great and all, it really should come from them. Or we should break them up for what they've done.
You can apply the same logic to find the K Street PR firms that Boeing and Warren Buffet hired to get hate stories on Elon Musk pushed to tech sites.
You can use a VPN service to see how Google presents 15 different versions of Google News biased 15 different bizarre ways depending on what country you are in, instead of just telling the truth. You can watch for patterns in the bias to notice "enhanced news" as I like to call it. You can also see full fake campaigns being used to direct folks to websites that have only existed a day or two. You can see all of this because Google won't mess with their own Trends. So you can see terms and conventions being thrown around by the Media at times that claim to be ancient but have existed for days, not years. You can literally observe the man behind the curtain.
Start using their logic to look where they don't want you to look.
America still got to see what unethical pieces of shit Amazon's Blog (formerly the Washington Post) are. That's what's really important. We saw wapo misrespresent and attack a kid and make themselves look like the racist, race-baiting shitrag they are.
Is building the kind of Police State where we can easily rig elections, and control the will of the people, like the UK has. They just have to slowly sneak the cameras onto us since we pretend we care about privacy.
On the post: The FBI Can't Get Into The Dayton Shooter's Phone. So What?
So they should call Google
Since Google seems to find new iPhone exploits every other day.
On the post: Ex-Googler Recently Held Up As A 'Whistleblower' And 'Proof' Of Anti-Conservative Bias At Google, Actually Supported Richard Spencer, Racist Skinheads
Well they had to smear the guy
And it's Google. So all of this is suspect. I mean, they changed their story on why they attacked Tulsi Gabbard three times. That's why they are getting sued, and will probably lose.
On the post: Daily Deal: The Lean Six Sigma Project Manager Certification Bundle
I Honestly Can't Believe I'm Saying This
It's good Microsoft bought Github. They will defend open source here.
Now I'm going to go projectile vomit until it's just dry heaving.
On the post: White House Once Again Circulating A Draft Executive Order On Social Media Bias
Oh, this story again.
I think after the 15th time this story pops up, saying something isn't happening you can see with your own eyes, you have to kinda start asking newer, funner questions.
On the post: Elsevier Says It's Infringing To Link To Sci-Hub; Hypocrite Elsevier Links To Sci-Hub All The Time
Re: Re: I write little scifi stories on a site
Why did you?
On the post: Elsevier Says It's Infringing To Link To Sci-Hub; Hypocrite Elsevier Links To Sci-Hub All The Time
Re: Re: I write little scifi stories on a site
Said the anonymous coward.
lol
It's like you are a clown.
On the post: Elsevier Says It's Infringing To Link To Sci-Hub; Hypocrite Elsevier Links To Sci-Hub All The Time
I write little scifi stories on a site
I've been doing it off and on for years. Every once in a while, someone will purchase rights to one of my stories. It's not a lot of money, but it's just the right to do a version of it. I keep my story, and I keep them up free (when I'm doing it). It's not me writing a screenplay. If I can't keep the story up, free, with no ads, on my site (I made that mistake once) I won't give up anything. It's literally how the stories are found. I had one story where I saw big dollar signs and a chance for more work, and I gave them everything, and it took years to get it back when they did nothing with it. And they literally let a timebomb clause run the whole way out rather than just being cool about it. Never again. Also, never trust an anthology series. I've had three now make big promises and they just dry up and blow away after a season.
On the post: AT&T Hopes A Confusing Rebranding Will Help Its Muddled Video Plans Make Sense
The Irony Here
They did all this work to try to take on and destroy youtube, but youtube is doing all the work themselves. Youtube might just be gone by this time next year. It's already nothing like it was even two years ago. It's becoming a sewer full of worthless network news trash.
On the post: Gizmodo: Why Can't YouTube Do 'Good' Content Moderation? Answer: Because It's Fucking Impossible
Pretending Pre-Election Censorship is Moderation
I think the main reason they can't do moderation is they aren't. They are blatantly censoring content to appease hateful morons.
On the post: Using Restorative Justice To Deal With Internet Trolls And Jackasses
You are pretending it's about content moderation
It's about censoring conservative viewpoints before an election because they are doubling down on being unethical because they haven't learned anything.
On the post: UK Lobbyist's Long-Running Astroturf Efforts Shows Facebook Will Never Be Able To Stop Fake News, Ban All Conservatives
Ah, The Empire Loves Censorship
Now send out the lapdogs to call it justice.
On the post: Why Is Our First Reaction To Mass Shootings To Talk About Censorship?
Well, um, we have an election coming up
And very unethical people are determined to make sure the poor people don't have a say. Censorship in the US is typically about shutting up those annoying poor people mad at the empire.
On the post: Philippines Lawmaker Introduces 'Fake News' Bill That Would Allow The National Police To Literally Police Speech
Can you blame any of them?
They just watched America's Elite try to do a Russian strawman argument against the entire country for three years, and it all end up being a proven hoax. Now they get to watch Google attack the best candidate for being too popular, and the media defend Google like they are just a bad dog and that happens sometimes. If I was any other country, I'd be worried sick.
On the post: Enough With The Myth That Big Tech Is 'Censoring' Conservatives AND That The Law Requires Them To Be Neutral
It's Adorable
When the gatekeepers show up to tell you something isn't happening that you can see with your own eyes.
On the post: Cord Cutting Is Setting Records In 2019
The bigger problem...
Is that outside of a handful of good shows that somehow get a free pass, most shows have been diminished or outright ruined with pointless politics. The worst are the shows that went all in on russian conspiracy theory plots that look ridiculous now in light of that all being a hoax. I used to watch about 9 or 10 weekly shows, a few daily shows, and maybe 2 or 3 anime in a given season. Now that's all flipped. As television got worse, Anime got amazing.
On the post: Court Dismisses Democrats' Nutty Lawsuit Against Russia, Wikileaks And Trump Associates
It was good theater at least
Now that Mueller has been eviscerated on CSPAN and we know for a proven fact it was all a hoax, it's good to look back with gentler eyes and just laugh at how theatrical the delusional folks were.
On the post: Josh Hawley Wants To Appoint Himself Product Manager For The Internet
Yes, it's a bummer Google wasn't as smart as they thought
And they got caught manipulating people. And they'll probably get broken up again. And it's their own fault.
While this apology for unethical Internet companies is great and all, it really should come from them. Or we should break them up for what they've done.
On the post: Once More With Feeling: 'Anonymized' Data Is Not Really Anonymous
You can do the same thing back to them
You can apply the same logic to find the K Street PR firms that Boeing and Warren Buffet hired to get hate stories on Elon Musk pushed to tech sites.
You can use a VPN service to see how Google presents 15 different versions of Google News biased 15 different bizarre ways depending on what country you are in, instead of just telling the truth. You can watch for patterns in the bias to notice "enhanced news" as I like to call it. You can also see full fake campaigns being used to direct folks to websites that have only existed a day or two. You can see all of this because Google won't mess with their own Trends. So you can see terms and conventions being thrown around by the Media at times that claim to be ancient but have existed for days, not years. You can literally observe the man behind the curtain.
Start using their logic to look where they don't want you to look.
On the post: As Expected: Covington HS Teen's Lawsuit Against The Washington Post Is Dismissed
The Important Thing Is
America still got to see what unethical pieces of shit Amazon's Blog (formerly the Washington Post) are. That's what's really important. We saw wapo misrespresent and attack a kid and make themselves look like the racist, race-baiting shitrag they are.
On the post: Amazon's Free Doorbell Cameras Only Cost Law Enforcement Agencies Their Dignity And Autonomy
The Important Thing
Is building the kind of Police State where we can easily rig elections, and control the will of the people, like the UK has. They just have to slowly sneak the cameras onto us since we pretend we care about privacy.
Next >>