And that's why Imaginary Property is theft. The copyright "owners" can decide that you aren't using it right and cut you off - even if you paid for it.
I can see why the 2nd comment by OP was muted, but why the first one?
Once you start multi-posting, the community generally sees this as spamming the board. Blue Balls (The OP) know this, but will often post two or more times to "Make his point" and people are generally quick to downvote his nonsense.
Because if you make 50 posts of utter nonsense who cares that one of them might have a valid point?
Blue Balls can't offer proof of "Common Law" or a million other things. How can he "Prove" Goggle produces child porn when he can't tie his shoes without assistance?
He's more than welcome to pick a screen name and register IMHO. I'm fairly sure that most of his posting problems are due to his attempts to remain anonymous combined with obnoxious titles, content and names slamming up against the spam filters.
Filters he claims are a horrible violation of his "rights" under Cabbage Law.
Honestly, if he'd just buck up set his own blog he'd understand the issues he bitches about better. We could see if he'd last two days without blocking my screen name.
On the post: Cable Giant Spectrum On Quest To Outlaw 'Insane' Streaming Password Sharing
Re:
And that's why Imaginary Property is theft. The copyright "owners" can decide that you aren't using it right and cut you off - even if you paid for it.
On the post: Cable Giant Spectrum On Quest To Outlaw 'Insane' Streaming Password Sharing
Not stealing shit
The Netflix TOS says you can have 1, 2 or 4 streams to different devices. Depending on your plan.
Obviously users aren't violating the Netflix TOS as long as they stay within those limits. (And Netflix will notice and block you if you go over.)
So this is all about big media monopolies crying because they want Netflix to change their ways and pay more money.
On the post: Content Moderation At Scale Especially Doesn't Work When You Hide All The Rules
Re: Re: Just because you're paranoid...
I can see why the 2nd comment by OP was muted, but why the first one?
Once you start multi-posting, the community generally sees this as spamming the board. Blue Balls (The OP) know this, but will often post two or more times to "Make his point" and people are generally quick to downvote his nonsense.
Because if you make 50 posts of utter nonsense who cares that one of them might have a valid point?
On the post: Content Moderation At Scale Especially Doesn't Work When You Hide All The Rules
Re: Is Troll for real?
I dare you to give us the link to Your supper better website..
Double dare you. Show us how a real champion of free peaches handles trolling.
Bet you would block me.
On the post: The FBI Tried To Get A Secure Phone Company To Create A Backdoor In Its Encrypted Network
Re: Re: TEN SENIOR FOLKS FIRED
So.... You are saying that Trump has fired ALL his appointees? The "Best People" all got fired by Cadet Bonespures??
On the post: Content Moderation At Scale Especially Doesn't Work When You Hide All The Rules
Brigade
The thing going on with these is "Brigading." Where an small army (large minority?) of asshats all get together and submit (fake) complaints.
The algorithm automatically trips since 10, 20, or 50 flags have been tripped.
Blue Balls tries to do this at TD, but withought backing the effort fails mo matter how many posts they make.
On Twitch, this takes down the targets and causes serious problems.
But who is to blame - Twitch, or the "Brigade" of Trolls?
On the post: Should The Media Voluntarily Embrace A 'Right To Be Forgotten'?
Re: Of course it's complicated
I don't think it's a tough call at all for such a story to be memory-holed from a newspaper's website
I think that wouldn't be holding the cops accountable. Sounds like a bad idea.
On the post: Chuck Yeager Sues Airbus For Mentioning That Chuck Yeager Broke The Sound Barrier
Re: "1st Amendment rights".
But they do have the Right of copyright? How does that work, exactly?
On the post: Should The Media Voluntarily Embrace A 'Right To Be Forgotten'?
Re: Sure. It'll be necessary
So you are pro-censorship via mandatory "Right" to be forgotten laws?
Or you'd voluntarily take down articles from your website no matter who asked?
On the post: Tech Companies Are Leading The Fight Against Child Porn While The FBI And DOJ Complain About Encryption Helping Child Abusers
Re:
If you can offer proof
Blue Balls can't offer proof of "Common Law" or a million other things. How can he "Prove" Goggle produces child porn when he can't tie his shoes without assistance?
On the post: California Senate Passes Statewide Ban On Facial Recognition Tech Use By Law Enforcement
Re: DNA
And your point is?
On the post: Court Shoots Down Cop's Assertion That Driving Without Breaking Any Laws Is 'Suspicious'
Re: Re: Re:
He's more than welcome to pick a screen name and register IMHO. I'm fairly sure that most of his posting problems are due to his attempts to remain anonymous combined with obnoxious titles, content and names slamming up against the spam filters.
Filters he claims are a horrible violation of his "rights" under Cabbage Law.
Honestly, if he'd just buck up set his own blog he'd understand the issues he bitches about better. We could see if he'd last two days without blocking my screen name.
On the post: Buried Whistleblower Report Apparently Involves President Trump's Conversations With A Foreign Leader
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OH MY Troll
Just remember "Deep State" rhymes with "Pizza Gate." It's all about the massive child slave ring run out of that pizza joint, eh?
On the post: Court Shoots Down Cop's Assertion That Driving Without Breaking Any Laws Is 'Suspicious'
Re:
What's with Blue Balls not doing his insane names?
On the post: House Joins The Senate In Moving Forward On Plan To Massively Increase Copyright Trolling
Re: Re: Re: Corporate Rights
i didn't think "Make Copyright Great Again" was in any way subtle...
On the post: Something Has Spooked AT&T Enough To Warrant Bringing Their Top Lobbyist Out Of Retirement
If you don't like the stories here I'm sure the ones you put out on your blog are much more interesting?
On the post: House Joins The Senate In Moving Forward On Plan To Massively Increase Copyright Trolling
Corporate Rights
Hey Corporations have the Right to protect their Imaginary Property. And they are going to spend whatever it takes to make Copyright Great Again.
On the post: Buried Whistleblower Report Apparently Involves President Trump's Conversations With A Foreign Leader
Re:
I wonder if he's swapping Maine for Greenland.
More likely he tried to sell Puerto Rico in exchange for getting yet another lawsuit tossed out of the Russian courts.
"I really hate those foreigners in Puerto Rico. Lets say you can have them all, and I can build Trump Tower Moscow. Deal?"
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/06/trump-foreign-business-interests/
On the post: Something Has Spooked AT&T Enough To Warrant Bringing Their Top Lobbyist Out Of Retirement
Corporate Welfare
Anything that can trigger a massive lobbying effort must be good for consumers. Can't wait to see what has them scared.
On the post: Buried Whistleblower Report Apparently Involves President Trump's Conversations With A Foreign Leader
Re: Well that's reassuring
At this point who wouldn't believe Cadet Bonespurs may have made a "really great deal" with his good friends Russia or North Korea?
He's constantly going on about how great those dictators are. Almost like he doesn't like democracy.
Next >>