You are allowed to make copies for backup, as well as the computer making whatever copies it does in the normal course of operation (for example, copying the code into RAM isn't a copyright violation). Maybe that is what you have in mind.
Normally, I would request permission as a precondition for holding the meeting at all, but in my jurisdiction, it is perfectly legal to secretly record a meeting you yourself take part in, even if the other participants object.
Zoom automatically notifies all participants that the meeting is being recorded, so you would need to use a separate screen recorder to record it secretly. Make sure you know the applicable laws in the jurisdictions of all participants before doing such a thing.
If I pay for one single payment of a fee for a lawful software (usually when physical), then I deserve to get property rights over it
Well that's the thing about copyright. You absolutely have physical property rights over any object you bought (such as a book or CD-ROM), but you only have a license to the copyrighted material on or in it, because that isn't a physical object. That's why sellers can get away with putting these conditions on the sale.
Re: It is really dumb that it isn't one with copyright law.
The fact that copyright alone and 1201 are treated separately and that the copyright's original limitations and exemptions (fair use) is not being applied to 1201 shows that it is really a joke.
In theory, they are. "Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title." Whether that actually takes place in enforcement is a different question.
Because it would be extremely irresponsible -- especially following a similar ejection six months ago -- to continue to scrape the web in contravention of two governments' orders to cease collection and destroy locally-sourced content.
And we know Clearview would never do anything irresponsible.
But they could be ordered to cease publishing the photos, which is the real intent.
If that were the real intent, they would have no interest in demanding the identity of the poster. Clearly their real intent is to find out who this person is (and then, my guess, is to turn over the identity to Sheth so he can take further action).
But it's not surprising that some software doesn't correctly handle significant changes in CPU architecture. Yes, it's a bug, but it's does make sense that such a bug occurred.
"I would tell you that the number one issue that goes into decision-making on the part of an officer is the behavior of the individual that they're dealing with. Period."
So as long as implicit bias / outright racism isn't the top factor in decision making, it's A-OK?
Some version of the ideas mentioned by Koby could address that or the initial screen could just make the user select "Mobile or Desktop?" and then "Opaque or XXX Ranking?"
Assuming James Burkhardt is correct, you would have to do this every single time you visit. I think pretty much everyone would get sick of that by the second time, perhaps earlier. And they would want to know why every web site they use is suddenly worse.
On the post: Does Copyright Give Companies The Right To Search Your Home And Computer?
Re: Re: Re: Hopefully Certain Terms Are Not Legal
You are allowed to make copies for backup, as well as the computer making whatever copies it does in the normal course of operation (for example, copying the code into RAM isn't a copyright violation). Maybe that is what you have in mind.
On the post: Does Copyright Give Companies The Right To Search Your Home And Computer?
Re: Re: Re:
That would probably be ruled unconscionable.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/unconscionability
On the post: Does Copyright Give Companies The Right To Search Your Home And Computer?
Re:
You can always alter the contract. They can then either accept your alterations or decline. It's worth a try.
On the post: Lawsuit Claims A Zoom Call Was Unlawful Imprisonment
Re:
Zoom automatically notifies all participants that the meeting is being recorded, so you would need to use a separate screen recorder to record it secretly. Make sure you know the applicable laws in the jurisdictions of all participants before doing such a thing.
https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/360000486746-Modifying-recording-notifications
On the post: Does Copyright Give Companies The Right To Search Your Home And Computer?
Re:
That's what the audit is for.
On the post: Does Copyright Give Companies The Right To Search Your Home And Computer?
Re: Hopefully Certain Terms Are Not Legal
Well that's the thing about copyright. You absolutely have physical property rights over any object you bought (such as a book or CD-ROM), but you only have a license to the copyrighted material on or in it, because that isn't a physical object. That's why sellers can get away with putting these conditions on the sale.
On the post: Jury Correctly Recognizes That Print-On-Demand Website Isn't A 'Counterfeiting' Business Engaged In Infringement
Re:
People who enjoyed Atari games long ago?
On the post: Metal Gear Solid 2 And 3 Taken Off Digital Storefronts Over Licensing For Historical Videos
Re:
But it wasn't necessary, as explained in the article. I will grant you that relying on fair use can be risky though.
On the post: It's Time To End The Anti-Circumvention Exemption Circus
Re:
Where does it say that?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201
On the post: It's Time To End The Anti-Circumvention Exemption Circus
Re: It is really dumb that it isn't one with copyright law.
In theory, they are. "Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title." Whether that actually takes place in enforcement is a different question.
On the post: Clearview Officially Kicked Out Of Australia For Violation Country's Privacy Laws
Irresponsible
And we know Clearview would never do anything irresponsible.
On the post: The Curious Case Of Billionaire Brian Sheth, An Anonymous Tweeter, Copyright Law, Twitter, And Some Company That Barely Seems To Exist
Re: Re: the twist
You're not limited to just one!
On the post: The Curious Case Of Billionaire Brian Sheth, An Anonymous Tweeter, Copyright Law, Twitter, And Some Company That Barely Seems To Exist
Re: Re:
If that were the real intent, they would have no interest in demanding the identity of the poster. Clearly their real intent is to find out who this person is (and then, my guess, is to turn over the identity to Sheth so he can take further action).
On the post: DRM Breaking Games Again, This Time Due To New Intel Chip Architecture
Re:
How do you square that with pirates getting a higher level of service, and paying customers getting screwed by DRM?
On the post: DRM Breaking Games Again, This Time Due To New Intel Chip Architecture
Re: No, it doesn't make technical sense
But it's not surprising that some software doesn't correctly handle significant changes in CPU architecture. Yes, it's a bug, but it's does make sense that such a bug occurred.
On the post: ATF Goes On Tour To Teach Journalists That Cops Are Usually Right When They Kill Someone
So?
So as long as implicit bias / outright racism isn't the top factor in decision making, it's A-OK?
On the post: Chinese Internet Companies Are Censoring People Who Write Or Speak Tibetan Or Uyghur, Lending A Hand To China's Cultural Genocides
Propaganda
Surprised there aren't any CCP propaganda comments on this story yet.
On the post: Infrastructure Bill Is Great For Broadband, But Still Ignores The Real Problem (Monopolies & Corruption)
Re:
You would be better understood if you explained some of those acronyms.
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re:
How confident are you that a judge would not consider that code to be part of the "platform"?
On the post: The Latest Version Of Congress's Anti-Algorithm Bill Is Based On Two Separate Debunked Myths & A Misunderstanding Of How Things Work
Re: Re: Re: What about Section 3?
Assuming James Burkhardt is correct, you would have to do this every single time you visit. I think pretty much everyone would get sick of that by the second time, perhaps earlier. And they would want to know why every web site they use is suddenly worse.
Next >>