If the underage child created a facebook account without his parents' permission, then the child most likely falsified information to create the account.
If they assert that the child had his privacy violated or was even somehow endangered because FB allowed him to post personal photos and information, is it a stretch to suggest that the parents' own negligence is the true problem?
f you're out in public, YOU are public domain. ANYONE has the right to take your picture. Publishing said picture for profit needs permission
No, permission is NOT required to publish any photo you take of any person. If I see you in public, and I take your photo, I can sell and/or publish that photo of you without your permission.
If permission were required, papparazzi's would never be able to sell any photos, you would never see photos of celebrities in clubs in magazines, etc. If I take your picture legally (i.e. not tresspassing or taking a photo of you in a place where you have a reasonable right to privacy, such as using a public restroom) I can do whatever I like with my photo...including making a profit from it.
This is the second time in two days you've indicated that you cannot waive your fair use rights in some way (license, contract). I did some searching but couldn't find anything to substantiate (or specifically refute) this. Can you cite a source for this assertion?
The waiver of your constitutional right of freedom of speech cannot be usurped by a legal paragraph printed on the back of a ticket. Buying a ticket to an event does not equal signing a non-disclosure act. And it certainly would not cover arbitrary forced control and censorship of your personal photos and accounts based on non-published criteria.
As long as what you post is not maliciously false with the intent to cause damage to the Burning Man trademark they cannot force you to give up certain rights.
Imagine if that was the case, then every business you walk into would post a little page on their front windows stating that you waive all rights to sue them for any reason upon entering, and you transfer copyright of any experiences you publish related to them in any format so they can force anything negative about them to be removed.
Fortunately that is not the case and business cannot force you to waive basic rights through the act of patronage.
Of course, if that were to come to pass, I can see people wearing t-shirts declaring that by allowing them entrance to a store, the store is waiving all rights to prosecute them for shoplifting. :)
Physical bodies are not sent through time, but consciousness is. Deja Vu is the only effect is causes when a consciousness temporarily piggybacks on another. Obviously prior to its implementation it has little effect other than for historical research, but post time travel it is used extensively in criminal prosecution. It was amazingly adaptable as all the required laws and regulations immediately passed as it allowed us to foresee the effects.
So it cannot be published in the US. Via the magic of International Trade someone can get on the Net, order the book from a country that will allow it to be published there and then have it shipped to them here.
Who said anything about black people? You know there are Hispanic gangs and multiracial gangs? You are the only one going off on a tangent about "black people".
On the post: New Lawsuit Against Facebook From People Who Just Don't Like Facebook
Re:
On the post: New Lawsuit Against Facebook From People Who Just Don't Like Facebook
My Thoughts
If they assert that the child had his privacy violated or was even somehow endangered because FB allowed him to post personal photos and information, is it a stretch to suggest that the parents' own negligence is the true problem?
On the post: Burning Man's Copyright Grab
Re: Re:
No, permission is NOT required to publish any photo you take of any person. If I see you in public, and I take your photo, I can sell and/or publish that photo of you without your permission.
If permission were required, papparazzi's would never be able to sell any photos, you would never see photos of celebrities in clubs in magazines, etc. If I take your picture legally (i.e. not tresspassing or taking a photo of you in a place where you have a reasonable right to privacy, such as using a public restroom) I can do whatever I like with my photo...including making a profit from it.
On the post: Burning Man's Copyright Grab
Re:
On the post: Southeastern Conference Wants To 'Control Memories' Of Sporting Events; Limits Reporters & Fans
I think the SEC Should be Prepared
On the post: If Robert Johnson Died In 1938... Why Is His Music Still Covered By Copyright?
Time Travel
On the post: District Court Bans 'Catcher In The Rye' Sequel; Since When Did The US Ban Books?
In the End, those who want it will have it
Who loses here? US publishers and US retailers.
On the post: Do School Administrators Not Realize Students Have Access To The Internet?
Re: Re:
Next >>