And yet, abortion providers are compelled in several states to read to their clients a state-endorsed statement featuring false claims about the abortion process and its effects. And this was upheld by the (captured) US Supreme Court.
At the same time a similar law in California was ruled unconstitutional which required Crisis Pregnancy Centers (religious centers that routinely pretend to be abortion providers to pressure pregnant moms to carry to term) to reveal they were not abortion providers and that there are abortion providers nearby.
Break the skin of civilization and you find the ape, roaring and red-handed. -- Robert E. Howard
When you chose not to participate in a society that respects the underclasses, you can't really complain when you learn too late you are far outmatched by the ravenous tiger.
Keep on the news. More evidence is uncovered every day.
Though the whole stop the process that will remove our guy from office thing totally makes it antagonistic to the current transfer of power. Ergo, a coup d'etat.
8. There are no real rules about posting 9. There are no real rules about moderation -- enjoy your ban
I'm pretty sure the 4Chan policies were made ad-hoc with no attention to consistency in format, hence MLP posts are highly restricted and Furry porn is restricted by time. The channels generally are a casual place that don't take too seriously the moderation process.
It's one of those seedy dives that has a sign:
No spitting! We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason! No anal sex in the common area until after 10pm!
I think the plan was to capture the courts and appoint Trump-obedient zombies to all the benches. That way Trump could sue over anything and be awarded whatever he wanted.
Their credulity of their leader and his allied media services is showing to be dysfunctional and has rendered them low-functional in US society (mind you, that's a high bar), but most recently and most importantly a danger to themselves and others.
But I am not a psychiatrist or psychologist, and I cannot asses them from here. Nor could one without a one-to-one interview.
Well, this is true once you criminalize speech. I was thinking of defrauding service customers or selling them contraband, but once we decide (say) preaching Islam is illegal, that's no longer free speech too.
Are you referring to PRISM and XKeyscore started by George W. Bush?
Or are you referring to the Stingray IMSI-Catchers secretly used by law enforcement nationwide until discovered, fought in court and sometimes used illegally anyway by police because no one is stopping them?
The only privacy you care about Anonymous is your own. Not mine. Not the people of the US. Certainly not fringe minorities.
So why aren't you linking us to video where Kodos pulls of his human suit on the house floor?
We're in an era where Dear Leader has 30,000 false or misleading statements to his name, catalogued in multiple databases, so we have every reason to be skeptical...
...of him and of you. I'm beginning you question whether you were actually there. Are you figuring we're the enemy so it's okay to feed us false information?
Obama demonstrated race doesn't define policy, given he continued a bunch of Bush policies, including the disposition matrix, lettin law enforcement and national security departments go full espionage (abd not counter-espionage) and letting the wiretap program become a full mass surveilance program.
Harris believed the justice system works and needs fine-tuning when it's corrupt through and through. Getting her into power, even with a friendly congress is not going to push the radical mass reform agenda the US needs to survive.
The onion thing is news to me. My first inclination is to assume it's a rumor intended to justify dismissing her story. And going to the revolution only to get a face full of pepper spray sounds completely plausible.
Are there any sources with solid evidence of the onion?
I'm pretty sure most telecommunications TOSes have a clause forbidding the use of the service to commit crime (such as fraud). In which case they can by contract ban you over what you say.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Compelled speech
And yet, abortion providers are compelled in several states to read to their clients a state-endorsed statement featuring false claims about the abortion process and its effects. And this was upheld by the (captured) US Supreme Court.
At the same time a similar law in California was ruled unconstitutional which required Crisis Pregnancy Centers (religious centers that routinely pretend to be abortion providers to pressure pregnant moms to carry to term) to reveal they were not abortion providers and that there are abortion providers nearby.
Double standards.
On the post: As Predicted: Parler Is Banning Users It Doesn't Like
What is asserted without evidence...
...can be dismissed without evidence.
You may have to get specific about details about Parler are false or misleading, and then determine the statement was willfully meant to deceive.
Otherwise, why should anyone care what you think or feel?
On the post: As Predicted: Parler Is Banning Users It Doesn't Like
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Break the skin of civilization and you find the ape, roaring and red-handed. -- Robert E. Howard
When you chose not to participate in a society that respects the underclasses, you can't really complain when you learn too late you are far outmatched by the ravenous tiger.
On the post: As Predicted: Parler Is Banning Users It Doesn't Like
"How the hell was this a coup?"
Keep on the news. More evidence is uncovered every day.
Though the whole stop the process that will remove our guy from office thing totally makes it antagonistic to the current transfer of power. Ergo, a coup d'etat.
On the post: As Predicted: Parler Is Banning Users It Doesn't Like
Re: Re: Perverts
From the Rules of the Internet
8. There are no real rules about posting
9. There are no real rules about moderation -- enjoy your ban
I'm pretty sure the 4Chan policies were made ad-hoc with no attention to consistency in format, hence MLP posts are highly restricted and Furry porn is restricted by time. The channels generally are a casual place that don't take too seriously the moderation process.
It's one of those seedy dives that has a sign:
No spitting!
We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason!
No anal sex in the common area until after 10pm!
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
"what exactly would Donald sue over?"
I think the plan was to capture the courts and appoint Trump-obedient zombies to all the benches. That way Trump could sue over anything and be awarded whatever he wanted.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
The Worst People Problem
They’re always angry and always on the hunt for ways that they can manipulate, and that means often turning on the platform. -- Hank Green
This seems to align with my Hierarchy of Chumps hypothesis regarding the Trump GOP (and maybe the pre-Trump GOP).
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Mental illness
Their credulity of their leader and his allied media services is showing to be dysfunctional and has rendered them low-functional in US society (mind you, that's a high bar), but most recently and most importantly a danger to themselves and others.
But I am not a psychiatrist or psychologist, and I cannot asses them from here. Nor could one without a one-to-one interview.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Re: "They can't ban you for what you say."
Well, this is true once you criminalize speech. I was thinking of defrauding service customers or selling them contraband, but once we decide (say) preaching Islam is illegal, that's no longer free speech too.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
"America surveillance draconian,anti-privacy"
Are you referring to PRISM and XKeyscore started by George W. Bush?
Or are you referring to the Stingray IMSI-Catchers secretly used by law enforcement nationwide until discovered, fought in court and sometimes used illegally anyway by police because no one is stopping them?
The only privacy you care about Anonymous is your own. Not mine. Not the people of the US. Certainly not fringe minorities.
Go back to school, dude.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
"The very reason why this is such a sh*t platform"
Dude, you totally don't need to post here.
You are free to find safer spaces in which to post your screeds.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Alleged evidence on YouTube
Yeah, that was reported here. What's it supposed to prove?
(I didn't watch the ten-minute video. I just looked to see what it was about. So what's the deal?)
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
I've made this joke before but it's sooo good.
Like ninjas, it's when you don't see the Antifa signaling gear that you know we're there.
I'm pretty sure Antifa are like Islamic Terrorists and Soviet Communists: Every neighbor, every suspicious friend, every person you don't know is one.
Even you can be Antifa yourself and not know it!
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
"I was there, you weren't."
So why aren't you linking us to video where Kodos pulls of his human suit on the house floor?
We're in an era where Dear Leader has 30,000 false or misleading statements to his name, catalogued in multiple databases, so we have every reason to be skeptical...
...of him and of you. I'm beginning you question whether you were actually there. Are you figuring we're the enemy so it's okay to feed us false information?
Either present evidence or STFU.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
"Since you're a condescending asshole, left-wing, nutjob..."
Ah the withdraw symptoms must be riding you hard. Maybe you should check into rehab.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Since you're a condescending asshole, left-wing, nutjob...
On the post: Identifying Insurrectionists Is Going To Be Easy -- Thanks To Social Media And All The Other Online Trails People Leave
A black woman for black woman's sake?
Obama demonstrated race doesn't define policy, given he continued a bunch of Bush policies, including the disposition matrix, lettin law enforcement and national security departments go full espionage (abd not counter-espionage) and letting the wiretap program become a full mass surveilance program.
Harris believed the justice system works and needs fine-tuning when it's corrupt through and through. Getting her into power, even with a friendly congress is not going to push the radical mass reform agenda the US needs to survive.
On the post: Identifying Insurrectionists Is Going To Be Easy -- Thanks To Social Media And All The Other Online Trails People Leave
Onion
The onion thing is news to me. My first inclination is to assume it's a rumor intended to justify dismissing her story. And going to the revolution only to get a face full of pepper spray sounds completely plausible.
Are there any sources with solid evidence of the onion?
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
"They can't ban you for what you say."
I'm pretty sure most telecommunications TOSes have a clause forbidding the use of the service to commit crime (such as fraud). In which case they can by contract ban you over what you say.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Like we are never there.
like IPU, we the Antifa Gay Ninja Corps is simultaneously rainbow and invisible.💨
Next >>