People want to secure their houses, but we still need to be able to enter with battering rams (possibly attached to APCs) and throw in flashbang grenades and storm in with heavy weapons pointed at you and your loved ones. Is that so hard to understand? Think of the children! I mean hypothetical children, not your personal, actual children.
I was curious, as a lot of the pharma demands (i don't recall about anything else right now) were pre-deployed a couple years ago. It sort of surprised me a bit then.
Not that Assange has not been railroaded ten ways from Sunday, but this sort insistence on legalistic-only definitions of "rapist" (or whatever) is seriously problematic. I wouldn't claim Assange did anything. I also find the accusations more than suspect. But for sake of argument, if someone did what they say Assange did, regardless of legal definitions somewhere, and regardless of a conviction with respect to some legal definition of rape in use somewhere, the actions described are damn well rapey behavior.
I don't find the OP remotely necessary, but i find reactions just as interesting as the OP. Particularly as the same pattern is visible in rather more well-documented cases.
Your point the third hits on a perennial problem: Massive overclassification and for extended periods, because someone said so. (And then there are the work product games, and deliberative materials games.)
Classification isn't required to be evidence-based, really.
I wonder how many of Madoff's victims have ceased to be. Not exactly a speedy process there. Unlike civil forfeiture, where the government gets what it wants immediately. (And seems to fall into a black hole frequently enough when people do file claims on their belongings.)
That isn't what this is about at all. Sure, some people operate that way, but that isn't what is being discussed, and the post author here makes disclaimers of this very nature.
What is of concern here isn't merely something violent or overly sexualized. These videos are purposefully weird and disturbing mindfuck. And quite frankly, they have been well-known for a very long time. And I doubt there is a way to usefully contextualize or explain these videos to most very young children. There is a huge mass of these videos, they are not random, and they would have easily been filtered from what goes into YouTube Kids if YouTube had been paying the slightest bit of attention whatsoever. I hardly think it is some kind of overreach to call it to the attention of YouTube. Am i screaming about how horribleawful it is and demanding laws, and blood from YouTube? Uhhh, no.
On the post: Is Trump's AT&T Merger Roadblock A Return To Sensible Antitrust, Or Just More Cronyism?
Re:
On the post: Monkey Selfie Photographer Says He's Now Going To Sue Wikipedia
Re: Work for hire.
On the post: Monkey Selfie Photographer Says He's Now Going To Sue Wikipedia
Re: Re: Photo booths
On the post: Monkey Selfie Photographer Says He's Now Going To Sue Wikipedia
On the post: Latest DOJ WTFness: Encryption Is Like A Locked House That Won't Let Its Owners Back Inside
On the post: With The US Out, Canada Gets Copyright Out Of TPP And Moves Closer To Agreement
Re: Re:
I was curious, as a lot of the pharma demands (i don't recall about anything else right now) were pre-deployed a couple years ago. It sort of surprised me a bit then.
On the post: Rozcomnadzor's Corruption Scandal Doesn't Prevent The Russian Government From Empowering It To Ignore Due Process
Re: Rozcomnadzor
On the post: Investigation Shows Chicago PD Has Zero Interest In Holding Its Officers Accountable
Re: That's The Chicago Way
On the post: UK Gov't Destroys Key Emails From Julian Assange Case, Shrugs About It
Re: Re: "public records"
On the post: UK Gov't Destroys Key Emails From Julian Assange Case, Shrugs About It
Re: Re: The correct name/title is...
I don't find the OP remotely necessary, but i find reactions just as interesting as the OP. Particularly as the same pattern is visible in rather more well-documented cases.
On the post: Is Trump's AT&T Merger Roadblock A Return To Sensible Antitrust, Or Just More Cronyism?
Re: Error
The other problem is they all seem to want to push further into the land of hyper-mega-ultra too-big-to-fail.
On the post: First Ever En Banc FISA Court Review Gives Plaintiffs Standing To Challenge Surveillance Program Secrecy
Re: Hidden Government ?
Classification isn't required to be evidence-based, really.
On the post: With The US Out, Canada Gets Copyright Out Of TPP And Moves Closer To Agreement
On the post: DOJ Still Demanding Identity Of Twitter Users Because Someone They Shouldn't Have Arrested Tweeted A Smiley Emoji
Re:
On the post: DOJ: Civil Asset Forfeiture Is A Good Thing That Only Harms All Those Criminals We Never Arrest
On the post: Sen. Feinstein Looking To Revive Anti-Encryption Bill In The Wake Of Texas Church Shooting
or something...
uh, We'll make sure of it!
On the post: Algorithmic Videos Are Making YouTube Unsuitable For Young Children, And Google's 'Revenue Architecture' Is To Blame
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
What is of concern here isn't merely something violent or overly sexualized. These videos are purposefully weird and disturbing mindfuck. And quite frankly, they have been well-known for a very long time. And I doubt there is a way to usefully contextualize or explain these videos to most very young children. There is a huge mass of these videos, they are not random, and they would have easily been filtered from what goes into YouTube Kids if YouTube had been paying the slightest bit of attention whatsoever. I hardly think it is some kind of overreach to call it to the attention of YouTube. Am i screaming about how horribleawful it is and demanding laws, and blood from YouTube? Uhhh, no.
On the post: Algorithmic Videos Are Making YouTube Unsuitable For Young Children, And Google's 'Revenue Architecture' Is To Blame
Re: Re: So!!
It's astonishing how hard this is for some people to understand or do, for some reason.
On the post: Algorithmic Videos Are Making YouTube Unsuitable For Young Children, And Google's 'Revenue Architecture' Is To Blame
Re: Lame liberal excuses.
On the post: Wikipedia Warns That SESTA Could Destroy Wikipedia
Re: Re: Re: Re: opens up smaller sites [ to a ] myriad of new lawsuits
Next >>