The best vpn is the one you make yourself because you know what you are doing, and there are free shell accounts all over the place if you look for them. Lots of things are like this. Knowledge is power.
Easy. She'll just have to never embarrass anybody in power. The mistake Wikileaks made was attacking Hillary Clinton. Now people that liked Clinton and won't admit she was terrible and attack them.
This will be nice. It will be interesting if they can find more of the documents showing the Podesta Group working with the Russian State to try to get US sanctions removed, or if they'll reveal the John Podesta links to Putin owned Rosatom.
Google News acts more as a bias repeater than a news tool.
For fun: go to google news in an anonymous browsing session. Be amazed as they try to beat you over the head with only one kind of news. Create an account and log in. Try to block those news sources (CNN, WaPo, NYT) and be amazed as they replaced all three of them with automated news repeating sites that carry the same exact storys. Block those. Be slightly less surprised those repeaters will be immediately replased with new ones. Be amazed that they call "think progress" a news site when it's a paid propaganda firm. My favorite thing they did though is somehow get my feedly feed without me giving them permission, and have somehow managed to give me all of the non-controversial stories from there. Like 5 percent of my feedly feed. I guess most of the stories there are too honest or researched for Google..... I mean, if you get excited thinking about Google censoring what you can see for their corporate overlords, I guess just go for it. Just remember it's for entertainment and political purposes only.
So basically the media is mad that their attempt to declare a piece of clothing racist failed? Consider how childish that is. Declaring a piece of election merchandise racist.... that's a new low for ethics in our media. No wonder trust in the media is at an all time low.
Consider that our media and our society is so broken, the author of this story felt compelled to pretend this was a problem only with conservative media at first. The first edit on this website was changing the title from one attacking Conservative exclusively. However, the first two paragraphs pretending this is only a "conservative media problem" still exist. Neat.
So, political correctness in 2019, (and your Google ranking) now depend on unethical journalists pretending everything is a "conservative media problem" in the first two paragraphs before you get to the real truth:
Liberal media copied Fox two years ago and are worse than Fox by a huge margin now.
On the bright side, you can do what this website did and do your fake clickbait anti-conservative headline first, so it shows up in Google News the way google wants it (like this website did) then quickly change it after you see it propogate to Google News (like this website did) to make it more neutral.
This movie feels like a wake-up call for the nutters that want to ban everything that doesn't fit their worldview. It's like a troll to wake people up that think social justice is more important than free speech.
Jonathan Swift is definitely turning in his grave. His works would all be attacked by the virtue signaling nutters today.
Sure, they should win. The didn't do anything legally wrong. They just published a fake document for polical reasons. They didn't know it was paid for by the DNC and completely fake at the time.
I'm ok with people getting punished when they lie to get attention. We have a serious problem with virtue signaling mental defectives these days. They cause real world financial problems with their mental problems.
Comments Sections aren't comments sections anymore. They are "idea farms". See, I've been reading the marketing section on how easy it is to build your own following with an AI Cloud "community and advocacy hub". There's literally a product you can buy now, if you are lazy. Like, if you don't want to hire your own Network Operations Center (NOC) and you want to outsource that, you can. It's going to suck, but you can. This is that same kind of thing, but you allow an AI to do it, and sign forms that say you won't sue if it messes up really bad somehow.
So yeah, you can make a fake PeTa if you want with one of these advocacy farms, but make it for anything. Like your lame candidacy for town fire whatever. And it will have fake wholesome AI bots pretending to be real people chatting up your website visitors and "forming meaningful relationships that lead to support you can use, at the push of a button".
The reason this is relevant is, I noticed something about a week ago when I finally quit social media forever.
Nobody is talking to each other anymore.
They have somehow made made things so bad now, we all just talk to the Ether, waiting for replies (like I am now, Like we all are, Like we all always are) but never directlyi at each other.
We have literally been conditioned to just shout at each other in rooms like this, basking in the attention of a number incrementing on an approval indicator rather than expecting some meaningful conversation.
(because that's more efficient and they make clicks and money faster. Man that boy that thought this up was a genius)
This entire system in place now, with AI controlled comments sections, and AI deciding who to ban and who to keep on Twitter (Oh, unless you think a human being is doing that. Handling the judgement call on hundreds of millions of... anymore. Noob. Still think PEOPLE at the IRS do your taxes? Do you child?
Most of our communication now is THEM to us. That was unheard of even say, 20 years ago. But now a good 90 percent of your TOTAL communication is between you and your interests rather than people. And they got your interests. They got that Game of Thrones. They got that hate boner waiting for you on Google News. Go justify being a hateful loser. The news media supports that now. They got those worldviews you should have this week on CNN. Whatever the wealthy 1 percenters on CNN think you should believe that week. For example, Maybe Warren Buffet has paid for the Media to say nice things about Apple again for that week. Since he had just invested a bunch of money into them, and didn't want them mentioning that they are now just a third place loser in smartphones. They got that new sexy Doctor Who spouting those Buzzfeed talking points. Because that's what the doctor does. Hang out on Earth and handle social justice issues.
Point is, that's not you talking to me. That's not us talking to each other. That's us being nodes. And at some point they won't even need us anymore. It will be most cost effective to handle us with a "pocket AI" that just decides what we spend money on to "keep the economy stable".
If that isn't already how things are. Kinds feels like it huh.
: )
This will probably be my last post here. I've suddenly decided this well is poisoned. I just spent six months following a careful plan to leave social media entirely and replace it with "actual media" where I have "friends" in "real life" again like I used to say, 20 years ago.
I figured out a good 40 percent of what I thought I "liked" was just me trying to appease imaginary judges
Example. "Actually, I kinda hate that TV show. A lot. I just felt I HAD to like it because of all the pressure from twitter". I kept watching a terrible tv show because I was conditioned to believe I was a "bad person" if I did not like that show.
This was a year ago. Then, with a few months, boom, this huge controversy when absolutely terrible content from low rent talent was exposed to have hired the same PR astroturfing firms to make their shows about "sexism" or "racism" to promote them, and that's how terrible content from people with zero talent was suddenly both in the news, and being shame-sold to me by twitter AI bots.
For some solutions blockchain reduces complexity by combining a currency for payment with a decentralized ledger. You can justify it that way. But barely. There's also potentially a cost argument, but it disappears in a puff of logic when you consider USENET, or even DNS as an alternative decentralized or hierarchical system. Both have been used for years to hold tokens by slick programmers.
Of very unethical people trying to justify the current cash cow known as "evidence free news" with more of it. The unfortunate reality is that news with no evidence is "Yellow Journalism", and the people that write it are full of shit. Better, we can tell. You aren't following anybody.
1) scare headlines in huge print, often of minor news 2) lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings 3) use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts 4) dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
1) check 2) check: (the least flattering photo contest) 3) check: typically misleading headlines and fake experts 4) check: pretending their rich sociopath 1 percenters are somehow better than the other side's.
This is easily 95 percent of all news during one of the Yellow Journalism outbreaks (fake controversies)
I'm not going to stop until I destroy theirs, and their desire to ever try it again. And that's not because I'm a shitty anything. It's because I'm normal and I like surviving.
Hmmm. I guess they probably shouldn't have talked shit about him huh. I guess it's good he has money. On the bright side, poor people can just kill themselves if they can't afford lawyers to defend themselves from hearsay and don't like their lives destroyed. Good talk.
On the post: Study Again Finds That Most VPNs Are Shady As Hell
On the post: Emma Best's New Transparency Project Targets Russian Leaks She Says Wikileaks Refuses To Touch
Re:
On the post: Emma Best's New Transparency Project Targets Russian Leaks She Says Wikileaks Refuses To Touch
On the post: Parody Washington Post Leads To Bogus Legal Threat, And A Reminder Of An Old Internet Lawsuit
On the post: Google Threatens To Shut Down Google News In Europe Over Article 11 As Publishers Whine About 'Publicity Stunt'
For fun: go to google news in an anonymous browsing session. Be amazed as they try to beat you over the head with only one kind of news. Create an account and log in. Try to block those news sources (CNN, WaPo, NYT) and be amazed as they replaced all three of them with automated news repeating sites that carry the same exact storys. Block those. Be slightly less surprised those repeaters will be immediately replased with new ones. Be amazed that they call "think progress" a news site when it's a paid propaganda firm. My favorite thing they did though is somehow get my feedly feed without me giving them permission, and have somehow managed to give me all of the non-controversial stories from there. Like 5 percent of my feedly feed. I guess most of the stories there are too honest or researched for Google..... I mean, if you get excited thinking about Google censoring what you can see for their corporate overlords, I guess just go for it. Just remember it's for entertainment and political purposes only.
On the post: Lawyer Steps Up To File Doomed Lawsuits On Behalf Of Catholic School Teens Called Racists On Social Media
On the post: The Splinters Of Our Discontent: A Review Of Network Propaganda
So, political correctness in 2019, (and your Google ranking) now depend on unethical journalists pretending everything is a "conservative media problem" in the first two paragraphs before you get to the real truth:
Liberal media copied Fox two years ago and are worse than Fox by a huge margin now.
On the bright side, you can do what this website did and do your fake clickbait anti-conservative headline first, so it shows up in Google News the way google wants it (like this website did) then quickly change it after you see it propogate to Google News (like this website did) to make it more neutral.
On the post: Producers Of Movie About Falling In Love With Nazis Using DMCA To Silence Criticism
Jonathan Swift is definitely turning in his grave. His works would all be attacked by the virtue signaling nutters today.
On the post: Buzzfeed Wins Defamation Lawsuit Filed Against It Over Publication Of The Steele Dossier
On the post: 'Fake News' Results In Real Jail Time For Ohio Woman
On the post: New Report Details Massive Mysterious Influence Campaign On Twitter
Social Media Isn't Social Media Anymore
So yeah, you can make a fake PeTa if you want with one of these advocacy farms, but make it for anything. Like your lame candidacy for town fire whatever. And it will have fake wholesome AI bots pretending to be real people chatting up your website visitors and "forming meaningful relationships that lead to support you can use, at the push of a button".
The reason this is relevant is, I noticed something about a week ago when I finally quit social media forever.
Nobody is talking to each other anymore.
They have somehow made made things so bad now, we all just talk to the Ether, waiting for replies (like I am now, Like we all are, Like we all always are) but never directlyi at each other.
We have literally been conditioned to just shout at each other in rooms like this, basking in the attention of a number incrementing on an approval indicator rather than expecting some meaningful conversation.
(because that's more efficient and they make clicks and money faster. Man that boy that thought this up was a genius)
This entire system in place now, with AI controlled comments sections, and AI deciding who to ban and who to keep on Twitter (Oh, unless you think a human being is doing that. Handling the judgement call on hundreds of millions of... anymore. Noob. Still think PEOPLE at the IRS do your taxes? Do you child?
Most of our communication now is THEM to us. That was unheard of even say, 20 years ago. But now a good 90 percent of your TOTAL communication is between you and your interests rather than people. And they got your interests. They got that Game of Thrones. They got that hate boner waiting for you on Google News. Go justify being a hateful loser. The news media supports that now. They got those worldviews you should have this week on CNN. Whatever the wealthy 1 percenters on CNN think you should believe that week. For example, Maybe Warren Buffet has paid for the Media to say nice things about Apple again for that week. Since he had just invested a bunch of money into them, and didn't want them mentioning that they are now just a third place loser in smartphones. They got that new sexy Doctor Who spouting those Buzzfeed talking points. Because that's what the doctor does. Hang out on Earth and handle social justice issues.
Point is, that's not you talking to me. That's not us talking to each other. That's us being nodes. And at some point they won't even need us anymore. It will be most cost effective to handle us with a "pocket AI" that just decides what we spend money on to "keep the economy stable".
If that isn't already how things are. Kinds feels like it huh.
: )
This will probably be my last post here. I've suddenly decided this well is poisoned. I just spent six months following a careful plan to leave social media entirely and replace it with "actual media" where I have "friends" in "real life" again like I used to say, 20 years ago.
I figured out a good 40 percent of what I thought I "liked" was just me trying to appease imaginary judges
Example. "Actually, I kinda hate that TV show. A lot. I just felt I HAD to like it because of all the pressure from twitter". I kept watching a terrible tv show because I was conditioned to believe I was a "bad person" if I did not like that show.
This was a year ago. Then, with a few months, boom, this huge controversy when absolutely terrible content from low rent talent was exposed to have hired the same PR astroturfing firms to make their shows about "sexism" or "racism" to promote them, and that's how terrible content from people with zero talent was suddenly both in the news, and being shame-sold to me by twitter AI bots.
Again, a year ago...
On the post: Breitbart Snowflakes Threaten To Sue People Who Have Asked Advertisers To Stop Advertising On Breitbart
Fun Fact
On the post: Why A Blockchain-based DRM Has Always Been A Terrible Idea
It's not hard to understand
On the post: Google Says Our Article On The Difficulty Of Good Content Moderation Is... Dangerous
So basically...
Enjoy your new Ministry of Truth, Google Edition
On the post: Axios Ridiculously Calls For Newsrooms To Ban Journalists From Having Opinions Online
There seem to be a lot...
On the post: UK Government Screws Head On Straight, Bans Use Of Term 'Fake News' By Gov't Officials
Re: Just call it was it was originally called.
2) lavish use of pictures, or imaginary drawings
3) use of faked interviews, misleading headlines, pseudoscience, and a parade of false learning from so-called experts
4) dramatic sympathy with the "underdog" against the system.
1) check
2) check: (the least flattering photo contest)
3) check: typically misleading headlines and fake experts
4) check: pretending their rich sociopath 1 percenters are somehow better than the other side's.
This is easily 95 percent of all news during one of the Yellow Journalism outbreaks (fake controversies)
On the post: UK Government Screws Head On Straight, Bans Use Of Term 'Fake News' By Gov't Officials
Just call it was it was originally called.
On the post: Shitty Man Shows How Shitty Men Can Shit On Free Speech By Suing Over The Shitty Media Men List
Re: Re: Counterpoint (since there isn't one)
On the post: Shitty Man Shows How Shitty Men Can Shit On Free Speech By Suing Over The Shitty Media Men List
If somebody is actively trying to destroy my life
On the post: Shitty Man Shows How Shitty Men Can Shit On Free Speech By Suing Over The Shitty Media Men List
Re: Re: Counterpoint (since there isn't one)
Next >>