Trump and Hillary both got ~26% of available votes. That is, they both got about 50% of the popular vote, but which was only about 40% of eligible voters.
So while it's true that Trump couldn't get 50% of the vote, nobody (including Hiillary) did either. Both of them, with the entire establishment media behind them could barely manage a quarter.
What legitimacy does any POTUS have with barely a quarter of eligible voters? I would argue that that is 75% of the country not supporting them. And now apply this to past and future POTUSes.
"This is the day-to-day bread and water of judges,” said Mr. Borenstein, adding that it is not unusual for police to eschew judicial review.
How is that not a flagrant violation of the 4th amendment, which reads:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
In other words, no Judge issue Warrant, on probable cause of a specific crime means no fucking search is constitutional.
The detail that techdirt keeps leaving out is that Hogan is suing them for posting, and refusing to take down a sex tape of Hogan. Yet they accused the celebrity icloud nudes were not OK.
Neither were actually newsworthy and Gawker isn't a journalistic organization. It's a gossip rag.
On the post: The FTC's Settlement With Equifax Is Such A Joke, The FTC Is Now Begging You Not To Ask For A Cash Settlement
Re: Lets do some math...
On the post: The FTC's Settlement With Equifax Is Such A Joke, The FTC Is Now Begging You Not To Ask For A Cash Settlement
147M x 125USD = $18,375,000,000.00
The settlement pool should be 18,375,000,000.00 USD, because that's how math works. If that puts Equifax out of business, then so be it.
On the post: DHS Steps Up Demands For Visa Applicants' Social Media Account Info
'Constitution free zone'
There's a reason the potential for violence is enshrined in the bill of rights as a legal option.
On the post: Massachusetts State Police Promise Higher Standard For No-Knock Warrants; Immediately Break It
4th amendment
How is that not a flagrant violation of the 4th amendment, which reads:
In other words, no Judge issue Warrant, on probable cause of a specific crime means no fucking search is constitutional.
On the post: Almost Every Word Of John McCain's Response To Chelsea Manning's Sentence Commutation Is Flat Out Wrong
On the post: Software Company Shows How Not To Handle Negative Review
'Bricking'
On the post: Arrested Backpage Execs Ask Kamala Harris To Drop Bogus Case She Herself Has Admitted She Has No Authority To Bring
On the post: Yes, A Billionaire Looking To Destroy A Media Organization Through Lawsuits Is A Big Deal Even If You Don't Like The Media Organization
Details
Neither were actually newsworthy and Gawker isn't a journalistic organization. It's a gossip rag.
Next >>