Re: Re: What's "clear"? You ask WHY several times, give NO facts
Snowden wasn't a whistleblower, because he didn't reveal anything that wasn't already well known. He released confidential operational details of publicly-acknowledged programs rather than anything indicating activities we didn't akready know about.
Your medical records are a good analogy. They are confidential, so we know they exist, but not what they contain. Snowden's claim to be a whistle-blower is based on the idea that no-one knew you had medical records. It is simply not true.
He was a paid spy for Russia, though; that's pretty solidly proven at this point. Treason for cash, not whistleblowing.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Am I sick/dying? No? Why would I care then?
Space lizards? Nope. The reptilians are from Earth. And obviously the whole 'birther' thing was just to distract people from realising he wasn't born, he hatched. Classic coverup ;)
It appears to ban all kinds of things they didn't mean to include, like face recognition of suspects by humans which involves in any respect, however small, technological assistance.
It does seem a bit odd to prevent police arresting a suspect they recognise unless they were only told he's wanted by a human, rather than via a computer system.
At least they haven't gone the way US states usually go with this kind of thing, and banned the possession of confusing faces.
Does anyone have a definition of 'net neutrality' that is both meaningful and doesn't contradict the actuality of how the internet works?
There doesn't seem to be any understanding of the relevant technologies. The internet isn't neutral, never has been neutral, and cannot be made neutral. It is literally impossible to prevent people having different connectivity or hosting capability.
Traditionally, these apparently bonkers trademark infringement cases were actually used to garner free publicity for both parties. It's a rebuttable presumption that it's going on here.
On the post: Georgia Court Streams Ridiculous 'Kraken' Lawsuit Hearing On YouTube; Then Tells People They Can't Repost Recordings
Re: Maybe they WANTED the Kraken lawsuit Streisanded?
Word's already taken...
https://londondesigncollective.com/guides/wet-sanding-vs-dry-sanding-whats-the-difference/
On the post: Florida State Police Raid Home Of COVID Whistleblower, Point Guns At Her & Her Family, Seize All Her Computer Equipment
Re: Re: What's "clear"? You ask WHY several times, give NO facts
Snowden wasn't a whistleblower, because he didn't reveal anything that wasn't already well known. He released confidential operational details of publicly-acknowledged programs rather than anything indicating activities we didn't akready know about.
Your medical records are a good analogy. They are confidential, so we know they exist, but not what they contain. Snowden's claim to be a whistle-blower is based on the idea that no-one knew you had medical records. It is simply not true.
He was a paid spy for Russia, though; that's pretty solidly proven at this point. Treason for cash, not whistleblowing.
On the post: Florida State Police Raid Home Of COVID Whistleblower, Point Guns At Her & Her Family, Seize All Her Computer Equipment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 'Am I sick/dying? No? Why would I care then?
Space lizards? Nope. The reptilians are from Earth. And obviously the whole 'birther' thing was just to distract people from realising he wasn't born, he hatched. Classic coverup ;)
On the post: Massachusetts Poised To Become The Next State To (Temporarily) Ban Facial Recognition Tech
They've drafted this wrongly
It appears to ban all kinds of things they didn't mean to include, like face recognition of suspects by humans which involves in any respect, however small, technological assistance.
It does seem a bit odd to prevent police arresting a suspect they recognise unless they were only told he's wanted by a human, rather than via a computer system.
At least they haven't gone the way US states usually go with this kind of thing, and banned the possession of confusing faces.
On the post: AT&T, HBO Put Another Bullet In Antiquated Theatrical Release Windows
Re: Re:
Only the Arr rated ones.
On the post: More Evidence FCC Claims That Killing Net Neutrality Would Boost Broadband Investment Were Bullshit
Does anyone have a definition of 'net neutrality' that is both meaningful and doesn't contradict the actuality of how the internet works?
There doesn't seem to be any understanding of the relevant technologies. The internet isn't neutral, never has been neutral, and cannot be made neutral. It is literally impossible to prevent people having different connectivity or hosting capability.
On the post: Ubisoft Bows To Monster Energy To Rename An Upcoming Game Horribly
Traditionally, these apparently bonkers trademark infringement cases were actually used to garner free publicity for both parties. It's a rebuttable presumption that it's going on here.
Next up, Fenwick's objects to the new name.
Next >>