Do you honestly think that apart from expressing jubilation that all you assholes have migrated to your own 'special people club,' that any 'leftists' are going to give anything remotely resembling a shit that you're gone?
If anything, “leftists” would celebrate the voluntary departure of all the bigots and assholes, then go right back to bitching about Biden and the Dems being a bunch of centrist dipshits.
The same thing has happened with other high-profile “conservative Twitter” wannabes: Lots of big-name right-wingers all threatened to leave Twitter for [x], but stayed on Twitter anyway because even they knew they had a bigger potential audience there (and they didn’t want to lose their account names).
Like I said, I’d give T.S a year at best before it crashes and burns. By the time it does, it will be filled only with hardcore Trump supporters; even Trump himself will have likely abandoned it out of boredom because he didn’t get enough attention.
I give Trump Social—hey, why hide what this really is?—six months to (at best) a year before it implodes and disappears, and it won’t have anything to do with all the tech issues. It’ll have to do with the service being a legit echo chamber of conservative/alt-right assholes trying in vain to interact with Trump himself (who has nothing but contempt for everyone who isn’t metaphorically kissing his ass). They’ll all eventually get tired of paying for the privilege of posting to T.S when (A) Trump doesn’t interact with anybody and (B) they can’t “own the libs” to their metaphorical faces. Once they see that it’s “Parler but with Trump branding and a pay-to-use fee”, they’ll lose interest and go back to Parler or whatever.
Hell, Gargron confirmed that T.S can’t federate with other Mastodon/Masto-like instances. Not that I was looking forward to hearing about T.S shitting up the Fediverse, but the fact that T.S users can’t reach out to and interact with other conservative Fediverse instances is hilarious.
sometimes to protect a tolerant society, you have to be intolerant of those who are intolerant, because by tolerating them you eventually destroy what is worth tolerating
Or to put it another way: Refuse to kick bigots out of your community and they’ll eventually make your community nothing but bigots.
Why would a reviewer that cannot create his own commercial quality video material be allowed to benefit from commercial quality movie clips?
Because that’s how culture works, you wannabe book-burner—we build on what came before, whether it’s to make entirely new works or critique/criticize existing works. The video I pointed you is a critique of existing cultural works that, upon its publication, became a new cultural work in and of itself by virtue of the commentary about Jackie Chan and the action scenes in his films.
If they can only create text content, they should get benefits of the text content
Under your Copyreich beliefs, they wouldn’t even be able to do that because quoting Jackie Chan for even a few words would be forbidden. And that’s not even getting into how you think the word processor used to type and arrange that text shouldn’t even allow someone to type that text into the word processor.
Some of the scenes in movies could cost 2 million bucks to create, but this reviewer fails to follow copyright and thus gets the material for free?
That’s life, bitch. Get used to it.
Why did the first guy need to pay 2 million bucks for the material, when 2nd person got it for free?
If you are seriously asking this question as if you don’t already know the answer, I legally have to inform you that you’re brain damaged and you should seek legitimate medical attention immediately.
If software developers cannot even create their own software, at some point they will lose respect of their peers when they only managed to implement someone else's projects, and did nothing on their own.
I’m sorry that you hate open source software and the open source ethos of open collaboration in development, but that’s your problem. Only you can solve it.
If software developers do not keep starting new projects when they're bored then they should find some other way to create their own copyrghted works.
So you’re saying a software developer has to develop an entirely new application dedicated to making one single copyrighted work every time said developer wants to make a new copyrighted work?
I haven't received any emails from users of meshpage or builder tool.
By your own admission, there aren’t any users who can send you emails because Meshpage has no active users. And even if it did, why the fuck would they want to email a humanity-hating asshole like you?
Duplicating the movie experience isn't valuable. Whatever the reviewer can contribute is valuable.
That video isn’t trying to duplicate the experience of watching Jackie Chan’s movies—it’s trying to enrich and improve that experience by explaining the filmmaking processes storytelling elements of the action scenes in those movies. That might be possible to do in a text-only format, or even in video format without using any clips from his films, but the experience would not be anywhere near the same.
That video is a critique of both action scenes in Jackie Chan films and action scenes in modern Hollywood action movies. I’m sorry that you think such things shouldn’t exist—or should only be relegated to a dry, text-only format—but your Copyreich beliefs don’t run this world.
Bold of you to assume you’re a skilled enough coder to make any kind of AI, let alone an AI that would want to work with a shithead like you, but go off if you must.
They are creating new works by using the builder tool and connecting graph nodes to build more and more complex copyrighted works in gaming area.
And yet, you can’t show off a single game made by a third party that was made with Meshpage.
any publish operations are outside the scope of builder tool and thus responsibility of the users themselves
If your builder tool can’t prevent people from infringing copyright inside the actual tool—and it can’t, since it didn’t stop you—under your explicitly expressed Copyreich beliefs, you’re equally as responsible for that infringement and deserve to be jailed, fined well beyond your means, and possibly even executed by the government. You’d have to follow your own laws, after all—and you already slipped up once.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Ah, so it’s another case of the “I have been silenced” fallacy.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
If anything, “leftists” would celebrate the voluntary departure of all the bigots and assholes, then go right back to bitching about Biden and the Dems being a bunch of centrist dipshits.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Who has Twitter prevented from speaking their mind outside of Twitter, and what speech caused that to happen? Be very fucking specific.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Also:
What speech qualifies for that label, Koby? Be exhaustively specific.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Only to bigots, assholes, and people with no experience in moderation.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
100% agreed, given the fact that the pay-to-use scheme was only recently revealed (so far as I know).
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
The same thing has happened with other high-profile “conservative Twitter” wannabes: Lots of big-name right-wingers all threatened to leave Twitter for [x], but stayed on Twitter anyway because even they knew they had a bigger potential audience there (and they didn’t want to lose their account names).
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
I don’t. That’s your belief.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
Like I said, I’d give T.S a year at best before it crashes and burns. By the time it does, it will be filled only with hardcore Trump supporters; even Trump himself will have likely abandoned it out of boredom because he didn’t get enough attention.
On the post: Nintendo Is Beginning To Look Like The Disney Of The Video Game Industry
Still can’t play as the title character in a Zelda game, though. Now there’s an evolution I’d like to see.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
It’s called “a job”, dipshit.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Yes. Yes, it is.
On the post: Trump's Truth Social Bakes Section 230 Directly Into Its Terms, So Apparently Trump Now Likes Section 230
I give Trump Social—hey, why hide what this really is?—six months to (at best) a year before it implodes and disappears, and it won’t have anything to do with all the tech issues. It’ll have to do with the service being a legit echo chamber of conservative/alt-right assholes trying in vain to interact with Trump himself (who has nothing but contempt for everyone who isn’t metaphorically kissing his ass). They’ll all eventually get tired of paying for the privilege of posting to T.S when (A) Trump doesn’t interact with anybody and (B) they can’t “own the libs” to their metaphorical faces. Once they see that it’s “Parler but with Trump branding and a pay-to-use fee”, they’ll lose interest and go back to Parler or whatever.
Hell, Gargron confirmed that T.S can’t federate with other Mastodon/Masto-like instances. Not that I was looking forward to hearing about T.S shitting up the Fediverse, but the fact that T.S users can’t reach out to and interact with other conservative Fediverse instances is hilarious.
On the post: How Our Convoluted Copyright Regime Explains Why Spotify Chose Joe Rogan Over Neil Young
Or to put it another way: Refuse to kick bigots out of your community and they’ll eventually make your community nothing but bigots.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Because that’s how culture works, you wannabe book-burner—we build on what came before, whether it’s to make entirely new works or critique/criticize existing works. The video I pointed you is a critique of existing cultural works that, upon its publication, became a new cultural work in and of itself by virtue of the commentary about Jackie Chan and the action scenes in his films.
Under your Copyreich beliefs, they wouldn’t even be able to do that because quoting Jackie Chan for even a few words would be forbidden. And that’s not even getting into how you think the word processor used to type and arrange that text shouldn’t even allow someone to type that text into the word processor.
That’s life, bitch. Get used to it.
If you are seriously asking this question as if you don’t already know the answer, I legally have to inform you that you’re brain damaged and you should seek legitimate medical attention immediately.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
I’m sorry that you hate open source software and the open source ethos of open collaboration in development, but that’s your problem. Only you can solve it.
So you’re saying a software developer has to develop an entirely new application dedicated to making one single copyrighted work every time said developer wants to make a new copyrighted work?
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
By your own admission, there aren’t any users who can send you emails because Meshpage has no active users. And even if it did, why the fuck would they want to email a humanity-hating asshole like you?
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
That video isn’t trying to duplicate the experience of watching Jackie Chan’s movies—it’s trying to enrich and improve that experience by explaining the filmmaking processes storytelling elements of the action scenes in those movies. That might be possible to do in a text-only format, or even in video format without using any clips from his films, but the experience would not be anywhere near the same.
That video is a critique of both action scenes in Jackie Chan films and action scenes in modern Hollywood action movies. I’m sorry that you think such things shouldn’t exist—or should only be relegated to a dry, text-only format—but your Copyreich beliefs don’t run this world.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
Bold of you to assume you’re a skilled enough coder to make any kind of AI, let alone an AI that would want to work with a shithead like you, but go off if you must.
On the post: Danish Court Confirms Insane 'Little Mermaid' Copyright Ruling Against Newspaper Over Cartoon
And yet, you can’t show off a single game made by a third party that was made with Meshpage.
If your builder tool can’t prevent people from infringing copyright inside the actual tool—and it can’t, since it didn’t stop you—under your explicitly expressed Copyreich beliefs, you’re equally as responsible for that infringement and deserve to be jailed, fined well beyond your means, and possibly even executed by the government. You’d have to follow your own laws, after all—and you already slipped up once.
Next >>